OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs TIBCO iProcess Suite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
991 views|783 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
TIBCO Logo
457 views|320 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText 360 for SharePoint and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Samy Abushanab
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams.""It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time.""The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great.""We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes.""OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents.""The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search.""This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository.""In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pros →

"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."

More TIBCO iProcess Suite Pros →

Cons
"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier.""The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use.""An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved.""They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them.""OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format.""I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit.""If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option.""They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Cons →

"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."

More TIBCO iProcess Suite Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."
  • "On-premises version is expensive"
  • "SharePoint uses a subscription model."
  • "There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."
  • "OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."
  • "The solution has a very complex pricing model."
  • "Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."
  • "It has a reasonable price."
  • More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price could definitely be lower."
  • More TIBCO iProcess Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams.
    Top Answer:OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers subscription-based licensing. It has a reasonable price. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.
    Top Answer:The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use. They could enhance the integration with Power BI and make it seamless, similar to Teams.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    991
    Comparisons
    783
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    505
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    457
    Comparisons
    320
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
    iProcess Suite
    Learn More
    Overview
    With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.
    TIBCO iProcess Suite is a proven and comprehensive suite of business process management (BPM) software that enables organizations to streamline the internal and external processes and tasks that span and make up their business.
    Sample Customers
    iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
    Delta Air Lines, Detroit Water and Sewerage, DVLA, E-Plus, FedEx, Geisinger Health System, ING Turkey, Kempen & Co., KPN, LCL, Merck, Merial
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Government12%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Computer Software Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Construction Company7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise74%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise81%
    Buyer's Guide
    OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 40th in Business Process Management (BPM). OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, IBM BPM, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms and Camunda, whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with Apache Airflow, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and Camunda. See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.