Microsoft Project Server vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Planisware comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
2,175 views|1,038 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
593 views|498 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Planisware Logo
1,896 views|981 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, and Planisware based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Broadcom, ServiceNow and others in Project Portfolio Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Project Portfolio Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The stability of the 2019 version is quite good.""The technical support for Microsoft Project Server and the support is very good. Microsoft support is working very well.""The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the tool's reporting is very good.""It can scale well.""Technical support is good.""The most useful feature of Microsoft Project Server is you can select a function to see the baseline.""I found the portfolio management valuable.""Deliverables List: Most useful to enable meaningful status reporting at an enterprise level."

More Microsoft Project Server Pros →

"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable.""Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective.""The solution's tech support is good.""The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy.""I like Primavera's planning capabilities."

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Pros →

"Overall, our company has all disintegrated systems, and with Planisware, we are getting a very integrated view of my portfolio reporting, cost and load, and everything else.""We have a variety of different modules, but it is mainly used for costs, risks, and resources.""The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution.""The solution is performance-oriented and easily customized accordingly to many areas, such as performance KPI.""It stands out by automating the intricate mechanics of project execution, eliminating the need for highly technical individuals to manage and reconfigure models.""There are two things in particular that I enjoy. The first is the portfolio planning section. Another advantage is that it is highly customizable."

More Planisware Pros →

Cons
"Permission management needs improvement.""The solution needs to be much more stable.""We are on the on-prem version. The cloud, however, gives more regular updates that we can take advantage of.""The product's UI is not very user-friendly.""It would be useful if the solution allowed us to share files or project schedules. You may get that with the cloud version. However, it's not available on the on-premises versions.""The user interface looks quite old and needs to be improved.""It may be considered expensive.""Collaboration within the tool is lacking when you compare it to online or cloud-based tools."

More Microsoft Project Server Cons →

"The scalability has room for improvement.""The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve.""The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement.""Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features.""They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Cons →

"The solution's user experience and user interface need improvement because they are not that great and intuitive.""Its stability should be improved. Its stability is the main issue, but we sometimes also have issues with calculations.""The learning curve is steep and there could be more avenues for opening up learning materials to a broader audience, enabling individuals to gain practical experience with the tool.""They do not have anything that can assist customers with multi-year roadmap planning.""The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution.""More integration is needed with other kinds of products for better collaboration."

More Planisware Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think they need more flexibility with licensing, because there are preconceived ideas that don't allow as much flexibility with the various licenses."
  • "The licensing was procured before my involvement."
  • "It has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter."
  • "It is on the expensive side."
  • "There is a licensing cost."
  • "There is an annual license required for this solution."
  • "I cannot comment on the price as I was not responsible for purchasing the solution."
  • "I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it."
  • More Microsoft Project Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is highly priced compared to one of its competitors."
  • "Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is an expensive solution. There is an upfront cost to purchase the solution and then there are annual fees to use the solution."
  • "The solution itself is cost-effective."
  • "My company has made an annual payment towards the costs of the solution. Price-wise, the solution is okay."
  • More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution could be less expensive and the cost of scaling is expensive too."
  • "There are training and certification costs."
  • "The solution is expensive and support is an extra cost. There are three license types to choose from, and we only pay for support and cloud services depending on our needs."
  • "It comes with a high cost."
  • More Planisware Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
    769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is very expensive. It is a part of my enterprise database. I am paying a subscription for it. It doesn't… more »
    Top Answer:Microsoft is going to integrate the Co-Pilot features into Microsoft Project. The AI feature is an additional feature… more »
    Top Answer:Here is a comparison of the main differences between Oracle Primavera Unifier and SAP Portfolio and Project Management… more »
    Top Answer:Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective.
    Top Answer:My company has made an annual payment towards the costs of the solution. Price-wise, the solution is okay.
    Top Answer:One area for potential improvement in the system lies in accessibility for individuals who are not part of a subscribing… more »
    Top Answer:The use case involves a highly sophisticated project and portfolio management tool. While it comes with a hefty price… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,175
    Comparisons
    1,038
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    356
    Rating
    7.6
    Views
    593
    Comparisons
    498
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    426
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    1,896
    Comparisons
    981
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    947
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Project Server
    Primavera Portfolio Management, OPPM, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management
    Learn More
    Planisware
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately.
    Oracle's Primavera Portfolio Management is the leading portfolio management software solution, providing unmatched flexibility and infrastructure for enterprise portfolio management. With its unique functionality, real-world enterprise scalability, and unlimited configurability, Primavera Portfolio Management is ideal for managing just about any type of portfolio from ideation through execution.
    Resource and cost scheduling, time tracking, risk and document management in a collaborative environment. Software solution that supports the end-to-end governance of company portfolios, from finance and resource planning, to the life cycle management of products.
    Sample Customers
    Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations
    Yarra Valley Water, John Wayne Airport, Hatch Mott Macdonald, Austrian Power Grid AG, EDF France, Chiyoda Corporation, Croatian Waters, Selex ES, Chicago Park District
    Apotex, Alstom Transport, HP, Stryker, Rexam, Jotun, Gelita, Kraton Performance Polymers, Abbvie, Rio Tinto Alcan, Maruho, Teva, SK Chemicals
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government11%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider71%
    Pharma/Biotech Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Energy/Utilities Company12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise78%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise80%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Buyer's Guide
    Project Portfolio Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Broadcom, ServiceNow and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: April 2024.
    769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.