OpenText Project and Portfolio Management and Microsoft Project Server compete in project and portfolio management. OpenText PPM seems to have an edge with advanced workflow and integration abilities, while Microsoft Project Server is strong in scheduling and user-friendly features.
Features: OpenText PPM includes comprehensive resource management, demand management, and advanced workflow capabilities. Microsoft Project Server offers project scheduling, collaboration tools, and integration with Microsoft Office Suite.
Room for Improvement: OpenText PPM needs better reporting, improved UI, and enhanced cloud integration. Microsoft Project Server could benefit from improved cross-system integration, enhanced collaboration features, and more flexible resource management.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText PPM is provided as both on-premises and SaaS, but deployment ease is mixed. Microsoft Project Server is flexible in deployment options but has inconsistent technical support.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText PPM is considered costly, especially for small businesses, yet offers good value. Microsoft Project Server is typically more expensive but viewed favorably for its subscription model and comprehensive feature set. ROI for both solutions varies by user.
Microsoft Project provides significant return on investment through time savings, enhanced visibility, real-time reporting, and risk mitigation for projects.
Their support tends to decline when not supporting cloud solutions.
It's challenging to navigate, often making it necessary to search for solutions externally.
Communication with two people, one was knowledgeable while the other was learning.
The desktop version does not have scalability.
Microsoft Project Server is fully scalable and is widely used in many industries.
I have never had to reach out to their support because the product works as expected.
While it is generally stable, there is still some room for improvement.
Exporting data from Microsoft Project, especially Gantt charts, is overly complex and not user-friendly.
Microsoft has become increasingly expensive, and there seems to be a push towards cloud solutions which can be challenging for some.
The lack of collaboration capabilities on the desktop version, unlike the cloud version, is a limitation.
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation.
Microsoft Project Server is on the expensive side due to high licensing costs.
Considering the infrastructure commitments to SharePoint and SQL, the implementation costs are low if already set up.
Microsoft's products are expensive for individuals.
It is not overly expensive and provides a fair value for the features offered.
The dashboards are amazing for data crunching and provide a project focus with upcoming predictions, including burn-up and burn-down charts.
The Gantt chart is also a very powerful tool for a visual presentation of sequences, critical paths, and execution processes, which simplifies comprehension for users.
This setup allows for comprehensive reporting and management across multiple projects and portfolios.
The workflow is amazing and highly effective in streamlining processes.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Project Server | 5.1% |
| OpenText Project and Portfolio Management | 2.4% |
| Other | 92.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 25 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 33 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
Microsoft Project Server facilitates project portfolio management and everyday collaboration, enhancing decision-making processes. Its integration with SharePoint offers a flexible solution for enterprise project management, catering to complex project needs seamlessly.
Microsoft Project Server empowers project teams and managers with enhanced communication and comprehensive project visibility. It supports dynamic resource allocation, financial tracking, and risk assessment. A cloud-ready platform, it simplifies deployment and scalability, suitable for diverse project environments and needs robust integration with leading productivity tools and services.
What are the key features of Microsoft Project Server?Industries such as construction, IT services, and pharmaceuticals leverage Microsoft Project Server for managing large-scale projects with precision. Its adaptability to different industry standards ensures specific project requirements are met while maintaining operational control and regulatory compliance.
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides user-friendly interfaces with seamless integration into tools like Jira. It enhances real-time visibility, resource planning, demand management, and workflow automation for more effective project tracking aligned with business goals.
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management offers extensive customization and reporting capabilities. It integrates effortlessly with platforms like Jira and Microsoft Project, offering real-time data visibility for improved decision-making. While its strengths in resource planning, demand management, and financial oversight stand out, users highlight the need for improved chargeback integration, enriched reporting capabilities, and more efficient license management. The platform aids in managing project delivery, investment, resource management, and financial forecasts, with modules for time tracking and reporting management ensuring transparency and governance.
What are the key features of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is widely used across industries for resource and demand management, handling project delivery, capacity, and financial forecasts. Entities incorporate diverse modules like time and defect tracking to ensure governance and tailor the platform to meet project management requirements, collaborating closely with developers for effective testing and implementation.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
