OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Planisware comparison

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Read 13 Planisware reviews

1,474 Views
737 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 13, 2025

Planisware and OpenText Project and Portfolio Management compete in the project management category. OpenText is perceived as superior due to its comprehensive features, suggesting it justifies a higher cost.

Features: Planisware enhances integration capabilities and resource management, offering tools for complex project tracking and collaboration. It includes project scheduling, resource and cost management, and centralized document storage. OpenText provides exceptional reporting insights, strategic planning, dynamic portlets and reports, and seamless integration with tools like Jira and Microsoft Project.

Room for Improvement: Planisware needs a more intuitive user interface and could benefit from extensive offline documentation. It requires additional training for users to become proficient in its advanced modules. OpenText could improve integration capabilities further and streamline its customization options. Its financial management capabilities could be simplified for ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planisware offers a flexible deployment model compatible with various infrastructure types and responsive customer service. OpenText provides an extensive suite of cloud-based services with outstanding proactive customer support, making it ideal for enterprises aiming at minimal downtime.

Pricing and ROI: Planisware involves upfront costs but promises efficient ROI through streamlined processes and centralized management. OpenText demands a higher setup cost but delivers significant ROI via its enhanced feature set, positioning it as a value-rich choice over the long term.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Planisware Report (Updated: April 2025).

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Planisware

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planisware

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is 1.8%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planisware is 10.6%, up from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

Mahmoud NourElDin

ITSM Consultant at Vodafone

Saves significant time on demand management and helps accelerate delivery

The ease of customization of the tool means I can support multiple departments in our company. Our users find it easy to use the service and the forms. And the Project Management module is one of the best modules that they work on. It is very important that the platform gives us a single place where we can measure progress toward goals, as we have weekly meetings with the CTO. We present these consolidated overviews and dashboards to him so that he has an overview of all the projects and can see the status of all the problems that we have and we are working on.

Read full review

John Andrew Kossey

Planisware configuration consultant at Comcast Business

Capably brings single source of truth to enterprise project portfolio management; provides consequential, flexible data display with effective visualization; integrated use of Agile, Kanban

Historically, some releases--even with extensive delays from initial announcement--had minor, yet troubling glitches. Planisware Enterprise has been addressing this shortcoming with more frequent releases that include helpful improvements. 7.0.0 release was January 2021; 7.0.1 March 2021; 7.0.2 July 2021; 7.0.3 December 2021; 7.0.4 March 2022. 7.1 became available in September 2023. Documentation has become much more thorough and clearly illustrated. Release notes for 7.0.4 has 133 pages. In my experience, small irritations I reported in E7 have been fixed in several days. SaaS provisions that Planisware provides in relation to security are superior to what smaller organizations can afford. Planisware SaaS no longer relies upon third-party providers. Faster data response time is a user benefit. Availability of Planisware software as a service (SaaS) contributes to operational stability; your team still needs to keep the configuration responsive to evolving business needs. Each customer has responsibility for continuing to grow "know why" as well as "know how." Investing in local capabilities on your customer side is vital--both for technical configuration and functional administrators. Over-dependence on the vendor can be needlessly expensive. Discussions with fellow Planisware customers conclude that commitment to achieving and sustaining product proficiency across versions is a key best practice. At-cost Planisware certification courses can provide training for a corporate customer's advanced users (those responsible for maintaining L1 level changes). One function I have requested for P6 and continuing through E7 is a comprehensive, detailed listing of attributes across modules--somewhat similar to attribute display in OPX2 versions (pre-P5). Some few attributes (e.g., Z-order) are difficult to document completely. Pull-down list of hundreds of attributes is insufficient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is its workflow."

"Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) has a very strong workflow engine."

"There are so many different pieces of functionality, and we use almost every single piece from deployment to demand, project, resource, and time management."

"I like the automated calculations, especially on the resource side. When project managers enter their resource requirements into their staffing profiles, they are automatically translated into labor forecast calculations. PPM automates a significant portion of the forecast calculations. Timesheets are also built-in. We automatically process time sheets and bill them accordingly."

"I like the ease of customization from an admin perspective. I'm really excited about some of the things that are coming in version 10.0.3 as far as what admins are able to do."

"Recent Program Management lifecycle, Program Management aggregation views due to interactive UI (selection of risks, issues, and changes in Program Overview) and “flash look & feel" of this functional chunk, which is different in comparison to other parts of HPE PPM."

"Micro Focus PPM is flexible and easy to use. It's simple to customize and configure workflows."

"Overall, they have a very strong workflow management capability. That's a very strong feature because then you can model any process easily. Whether it is a demand management process, a pipeline management process, or your project delivery methodology, it is much easier because of their workflow management capability."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management pros

"We have a variety of different modules, but it is mainly used for costs, risks, and resources."

"It stands out by automating the intricate mechanics of project execution, eliminating the need for highly technical individuals to manage and reconfigure models."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"It has an inbuilt BI tool, which can be compared to Power BI or Tableau."

"Planisware offers integration with multiple tools and provides a good level of customization."

"The solution is performance-oriented and easily customized accordingly to many areas, such as performance KPI."

"There are two things in particular that I enjoy. The first is the portfolio planning section. Another advantage is that it is highly customizable."

"Planisware has introduced Agile concepts, making it capable of Agile management similar to Jira and other Agile tools."

More Planisware pros

Cons

"The user interface is very, very old and is missing some functions, such as, for example, re-do, follow, and share functions. The UI is not good."

"I would also like to see improvement in PPM's reporting and alerts. PPM has reporting capabilities, including HTML reports and portlets. But a majority of clients will build their own reporting platforms, or they will use external reporting platforms like Tableau and QlikView."

"Portfolio scenarios: This is a very powerful feature. However, it’s limited to analyses."

"We had a couple of issues with stability or performance degradation about a year ago, around the time of the initial rollout. Since then, we've only had two unexpected outages that were quickly resolved."

"Micro Focus PPM should be less dependent on coding. It could also benefit from some updates to the software architecture. These have been on the roadmap for years now, but they haven't been released."

"Reporting; need to be able to provide fancy reporting out of PPM, way it is done in OBIEE etc."

"OpenText Project and Portfolio Management should move their database from Oracle."

"The user experience of the product needs to be improved"

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management cons

"The learning curve is steep and there could be more avenues for opening up learning materials to a broader audience, enabling individuals to gain practical experience with the tool."

"The UI and UX of Planisware are not that advanced."

"More integration is needed with other kinds of products for better collaboration."

"The solution's user experience and user interface need improvement because they are not that great and intuitive."

"They do not have anything that can assist customers with multi-year roadmap planning."

"I have experienced some issues, and that’s okay. It tends to be stable when the server's processing power and memory are adequate."

"Its stability should be improved. Its stability is the main issue, but we sometimes also have issues with calculations."

More Planisware cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Support and license management are two hurdles for us. Every time we purchase new licenses, it has taken us half a year to implement those."

"HPE PPM SaaS model is comprehensive, however, the base fee component has customer resistance to its recurring setup,"

"We have an annual license, and it is fairly priced in comparison to that of other solutions."

"Now, we also received an increase in the support license prices, without any advanced notice. At this point, switching to unify all our licensing under HPE and customer support has been poor."

"It is SaaS without a base fee."

"There is an additional cost for product support"

"A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized company. The license is based on the number of users."

"There are training and certification costs."

"The solution is expensive and support is an extra cost. There are three license types to choose from, and we only pay for support and cloud services depending on our needs."

"The solution could be less expensive and the cost of scaling is expensive too."

"It comes with a high cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

25%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

18%

Energy/Utilities Company

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?

Hi, @Cheryl Joseph Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management solution could be a good candidate, see my review on this product, or if you may need more information to drop me a message. You can...

What do you like most about Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

Micro Focus PPM is flexible and easy to use. It's simple to customize and configure workflows.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

The price of this solution is reasonable. It is not overly expensive and provides a fair value for the features offered.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Planisware?

I don't have any specific details, however, it might be expensive.

What needs improvement with Planisware?

I haven't had the time to work with any other TPM tools, so I can't compare it to other tools just yet.

What is your primary use case for Planisware?

We actually use it for project planning and estimating the cost for the projects, in resource management, and as a timecard application. Users can log their time using the timesheet.

Smartsheet vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Comparisons

Compared 54% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 46% of the time

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Competitors

Jira vs Planisware

Compared 16% of the time

Smartsheet vs Planisware

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Project vs Planisware

Compared 10% of the time

Asana vs Planisware

Compared 10% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planisware

Compared 9% of the time

More Planisware Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Download OpenText Project and Portfolio Management product report

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management report

Download Planisware product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM), HPE Project and Portfolio Management PPM

No data available

Overview

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides user-friendly interfaces with seamless integration into tools like Jira. It enhances real-time visibility, resource planning, demand management, and workflow automation for more effective project tracking aligned with business goals.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management offers extensive customization and reporting capabilities. It integrates effortlessly with platforms like Jira and Microsoft Project, offering real-time data visibility for improved decision-making. While its strengths in resource planning, demand management, and financial oversight stand out, users highlight the need for improved chargeback integration, enriched reporting capabilities, and more efficient license management. The platform aids in managing project delivery, investment, resource management, and financial forecasts, with modules for time tracking and reporting management ensuring transparency and governance.

What are the key features of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

Real-Time Visibility: Offers trusted data for immediate insights.
Resource Planning: Assists in managing team allocation effectively.
Demand Management: Supports balanced project prioritization.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines processes to improve efficiency.
Scenario Comparison: Evaluates different project plans for best outcomes.
Financial Oversight: Monitors budgets and financial predictions.

What benefits can organizations expect from OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

Enhanced Decision-Making: Utilizes real-time data for better choices.
Improved Integration: Seamless sync with common project tools.
Increased Transparency: Comprehensive reporting capabilities.
Efficient Resource Management: Optimizes resource allocation and utilization.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is widely used across industries for resource and demand management, handling project delivery, capacity, and financial forecasts. Entities incorporate diverse modules like time and defect tracking to ensure governance and tailor the platform to meet project management requirements, collaborating closely with developers for effective testing and implementation.

OpenText

Resource and cost scheduling, time tracking, risk and document management in a collaborative environment. Software solution that supports the end-to-end governance of company portfolios, from finance and resource planning, to the life cycle management of products.

Sample Customers

Bank Simpanan Nasional, Smart Communications, Aareon AG

Apotex, Alstom Transport, HP, Stryker, Rexam, Jotun, Gelita, Kraton Performance Polymers, Abbvie, Rio Tinto Alcan, Maruho, Teva, SK Chemicals

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Planisware