Planisware and OpenText Project and Portfolio Management are powerful project management tools competing in the project management category. Planisware seems to have the upper hand in resource and cost management, favored by R&D and pharmaceuticals, while OpenText PPM is seen as cost-effective for large-scale implementations due to its comprehensive project management experience.
Features: Planisware is known for its robust resource and cost management, offering flexibility across project modules, time slicing, and strategic roadmaps. OpenText PPM offers robust workflow and integration capabilities, delivering real-time visibility and extensive financial management, along with seamless integrations with tools like Microsoft Project.
Room for Improvement: Planisware users highlight challenges in reporting, usability for non-subscribers, and agile feature integration. Enhancements in technical support availability are also suggested. OpenText PPM could improve user experience, portfolio planning, and resource allocation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planisware provides flexible deployment options across hybrid, private, and public clouds but has mixed reviews on customer support, being seen as costly and reactive by some. OpenText PPM is primarily offered on-premises, with users finding licensing and support challenging, especially involving third parties.
Pricing and ROI: Both solutions are considered expensive, with Planisware viewed as more costly, particularly regarding implementation and support. ROI is considered dependent on system stability and proactive user engagement. OpenText PPM is seen as transparent in pricing and affordable for larger organizations, even though smaller entities may find the costs high.
It is primarily used for the pharma vertical and related fields, and since we were running a full ERP digital transformation project in the life sciences domain, it suited that requirement very well.
Sometimes I feel that the ROI is not optimal because we are totally dependent on Planisware's system stability.
The support was good, but there's more space for collaboration that we can do internally through Planisware, which was not the case.
We experienced a couple of issues, and they responded and resolved the issues and bugs promptly.
The scalability of Planisware is good, as when you want to implement changes, you need to manage the process with your collaborators.
We experienced crashes in the upcoming year, but these mostly occurred on weekends, which minimized the impact on our users.
While it is generally stable, there is still some room for improvement.
They have made significant improvements, but still, there is a long way to go in terms of their flexibility, adaptability, and usability.
Sometimes the ROI is affected because we are totally dependent on Planisware's system stability.
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation.
The integrations to Agile are essential; we had to do a full build to accomplish that.
We have experienced crashes in Planisware and system slowdowns.
The reports should be improved because all companies now need reporting, and with tools such as Grafana or Tableau, Planisware needs to add interfaces for data lakes since all companies require this.
It is not overly expensive and provides a fair value for the features offered.
The workflow is amazing and highly effective in streamlining processes.
The tools communicate with other tools, making it effective, and when we have a new resource, we can add it and send it to the resource management team, who can view it in Planisware.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Planisware | 7.7% |
| OpenText Project and Portfolio Management | 3.1% |
| Other | 89.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides user-friendly interfaces with seamless integration into tools like Jira. It enhances real-time visibility, resource planning, demand management, and workflow automation for more effective project tracking aligned with business goals.
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management offers extensive customization and reporting capabilities. It integrates effortlessly with platforms like Jira and Microsoft Project, offering real-time data visibility for improved decision-making. While its strengths in resource planning, demand management, and financial oversight stand out, users highlight the need for improved chargeback integration, enriched reporting capabilities, and more efficient license management. The platform aids in managing project delivery, investment, resource management, and financial forecasts, with modules for time tracking and reporting management ensuring transparency and governance.
What are the key features of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is widely used across industries for resource and demand management, handling project delivery, capacity, and financial forecasts. Entities incorporate diverse modules like time and defect tracking to ensure governance and tailor the platform to meet project management requirements, collaborating closely with developers for effective testing and implementation.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
