OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Planisware comparison

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Read 13 Planisware reviews

1,429 Views
663 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 18, 2025

Planisware and OpenText Project and Portfolio Management compete in the project management software category. OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is generally seen as having an overall edge due to its comprehensive features.

Features: Planisware offers extensive configurability, excels in scenario planning, and provides robust resource management. OpenText Project and Portfolio Management focuses on strong document management, facilitates collaboration, and offers impressive integration capabilities for handling complex projects.

Room for Improvement: Planisware could improve its user interface for better usability, reduce deployment complexity, and provide more offline documentation. OpenText could enhance its reporting features, streamline its workflow configuration, and improve its agility in responding to feature enhancement requests.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planisware features a flexible deployment model but faces challenges with deployment time and complexity, though customer support is rated positively. OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides straightforward deployment with both cloud and on-premise options, combined with accessible and effective customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Planisware is known for a higher initial setup cost, which can be justified by its configurability and ROI for large organizations. OpenText Project and Portfolio Management presents competitive pricing with a quicker payback period, appealing to those prioritizing cost-effectiveness and rapid ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Planisware Report (Updated: June 2025).

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Planisware

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planisware

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is 1.9%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planisware is 10.5%, up from 7.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Useful for resource and financial management but needs to change Oracle database

The solution helps with tech management. It has a work plan similar to Microsoft Project for tracking progress anywhere. It can synchronize with Microsoft Projects for updating and rebooting tasks. They can also assign tasks to team members who can update progress using timesheets without a sheet. It includes a Project dashboard for managing multiple projects simultaneously and program management for overseeing groups of projects. It offers various data metrics. It has project entities for controlling risks, issues, and protections. It can calculate costs based on resource tasks and compare actual and planned costs. The tool has features for scenario comparison, allowing us to optimize scenarios based on various factors. Additionally, we can manually optimize by managing resource availability, creating staffing profiles, and making payments to optimize in any situation.

Read full review

Avinash Padmanabhan

Planisware Consultant | Delivery Lead at Schlumberger

Enhanced project and resource management with Agile integration

Primarily, Planisware is used for project, program, and portfolio management purposes. Projects can be scheduled, and budgeting, tracking, resource management, efforts, forecast, and scheduling can be executed using the Planisware application It offers capabilities to manage the complete project…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Resource management: The resource management module is very complete and covers most of the time all needs of customers."

"The portfolio management and the resource management are the key features."

"I like the automated calculations, especially on the resource side. When project managers enter their resource requirements into their staffing profiles, they are automatically translated into labor forecast calculations. PPM automates a significant portion of the forecast calculations. Timesheets are also built-in. We automatically process time sheets and bill them accordingly."

"Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) has a very strong workflow engine."

"The data provided by PPM is trusted and is available almost immediately; without trusted data there is very less scope of any tool to be successful."

"The solution helps with tech management. It has a work plan similar to Microsoft Project for tracking progress anywhere. It can synchronize with Microsoft Projects for updating and rebooting tasks. They can also assign tasks to team members who can update progress using timesheets without a sheet."

"There are so many different pieces of functionality, and we use almost every single piece from deployment to demand, project, resource, and time management."

"Micro Focus PPM is flexible and easy to use. It's simple to customize and configure workflows."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management pros

"Planisware offers integration with multiple tools and provides a good level of customization."

"We have a variety of different modules, but it is mainly used for costs, risks, and resources."

"There are two things in particular that I enjoy. The first is the portfolio planning section. Another advantage is that it is highly customizable."

"The solution is performance-oriented and easily customized accordingly to many areas, such as performance KPI."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"It stands out by automating the intricate mechanics of project execution, eliminating the need for highly technical individuals to manage and reconfigure models."

"It has an inbuilt BI tool, which can be compared to Power BI or Tableau."

"Planisware has introduced Agile concepts, making it capable of Agile management similar to Jira and other Agile tools."

More Planisware pros

Cons

"I was not involved in the initial setup. I know that the project involved a lot of consulting that took a long time."

"Portfolio scenarios: This is a very powerful feature. However, it’s limited to analyses."

"I would also like to see improvement in PPM's reporting and alerts. PPM has reporting capabilities, including HTML reports and portlets. But a majority of clients will build their own reporting platforms, or they will use external reporting platforms like Tableau and QlikView."

"They can make its UI better. Currently, the UI is a bit clunky."

"The solution can sometimes be a little inflexible and a bit caustic."

"We had a couple of issues with stability or performance degradation about a year ago, around the time of the initial rollout. Since then, we've only had two unexpected outages that were quickly resolved."

"Micro Focus PPM should be less dependent on coding. It could also benefit from some updates to the software architecture. These have been on the roadmap for years now, but they haven't been released."

"We constantly put in requests for some of the things we need. One of those is being able to export just our standard request type to PDF."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management cons

"The learning curve is steep and there could be more avenues for opening up learning materials to a broader audience, enabling individuals to gain practical experience with the tool."

"More integration is needed with other kinds of products for better collaboration."

"The UI and UX of Planisware are not that advanced."

"I have experienced some issues, and that’s okay. It tends to be stable when the server's processing power and memory are adequate."

"Its stability should be improved. Its stability is the main issue, but we sometimes also have issues with calculations."

"The biggest con for Planisware is that if you are not a Planisware partner, you don't have access to their functions, making it difficult for beginners and new team members."

"They do not have anything that can assist customers with multi-year roadmap planning."

More Planisware cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is SaaS without a base fee."

"We have an annual license, and it is fairly priced in comparison to that of other solutions."

"Support and license management are two hurdles for us. Every time we purchase new licenses, it has taken us half a year to implement those."

"Now, we also received an increase in the support license prices, without any advanced notice. At this point, switching to unify all our licensing under HPE and customer support has been poor."

"HPE PPM SaaS model is comprehensive, however, the base fee component has customer resistance to its recurring setup,"

"There is an additional cost for product support"

"A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized company. The license is based on the number of users."

"The solution could be less expensive and the cost of scaling is expensive too."

"It comes with a high cost."

"There are training and certification costs."

"The solution is expensive and support is an extra cost. There are three license types to choose from, and we only pay for support and cloud services depending on our needs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

25%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

10%

University

Manufacturing Company

17%

Energy/Utilities Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?

Hi, @Cheryl Joseph Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management solution could be a good candidate, see my review on this product, or if you may need more information to drop me a message. You can...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

The price of this solution is reasonable. It is not overly expensive and provides a fair value for the features offered.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation. Additionally, strategic portfolio management and investment management s...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Planisware?

I don't have any specific details, however, it might be expensive.

What needs improvement with Planisware?

I haven't had the time to work with any other TPM tools, so I can't compare it to other tools just yet.

What is your primary use case for Planisware?

We actually use it for project planning and estimating the cost for the projects, in resource management, and as a timecard application. Users can log their time using the timesheet.

Smartsheet vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Comparisons

Compared 38% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 33% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 30% of the time

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Competitors

Jira vs Planisware

Compared 15% of the time

Smartsheet vs Planisware

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Project vs Planisware

Compared 9% of the time

Asana vs Planisware

Compared 9% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planisware

Compared 8% of the time

More Planisware Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

May 2025

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management report

Download OpenText Project and Portfolio Management product report

Download Planisware product report

May 2025

Also Known As

Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM), HPE Project and Portfolio Management PPM

No data available

Overview

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides user-friendly interfaces with seamless integration into tools like Jira. It enhances real-time visibility, resource planning, demand management, and workflow automation for more effective project tracking aligned with business goals.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management offers extensive customization and reporting capabilities. It integrates effortlessly with platforms like Jira and Microsoft Project, offering real-time data visibility for improved decision-making. While its strengths in resource planning, demand management, and financial oversight stand out, users highlight the need for improved chargeback integration, enriched reporting capabilities, and more efficient license management. The platform aids in managing project delivery, investment, resource management, and financial forecasts, with modules for time tracking and reporting management ensuring transparency and governance.

What are the key features of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

Real-Time Visibility: Offers trusted data for immediate insights.
Resource Planning: Assists in managing team allocation effectively.
Demand Management: Supports balanced project prioritization.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines processes to improve efficiency.
Scenario Comparison: Evaluates different project plans for best outcomes.
Financial Oversight: Monitors budgets and financial predictions.

What benefits can organizations expect from OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

Enhanced Decision-Making: Utilizes real-time data for better choices.
Improved Integration: Seamless sync with common project tools.
Increased Transparency: Comprehensive reporting capabilities.
Efficient Resource Management: Optimizes resource allocation and utilization.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is widely used across industries for resource and demand management, handling project delivery, capacity, and financial forecasts. Entities incorporate diverse modules like time and defect tracking to ensure governance and tailor the platform to meet project management requirements, collaborating closely with developers for effective testing and implementation.

OpenText

Resource and cost scheduling, time tracking, risk and document management in a collaborative environment. Software solution that supports the end-to-end governance of company portfolios, from finance and resource planning, to the life cycle management of products.

Sample Customers

Bank Simpanan Nasional, Smart Communications, Aareon AG

Apotex, Alstom Transport, HP, Stryker, Rexam, Jotun, Gelita, Kraton Performance Polymers, Abbvie, Rio Tinto Alcan, Maruho, Teva, SK Chemicals