We performed a comparison between Microsoft Dynamics AX and NetSuite OneWorld based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's most valuable features are its day-to-day operations, Power BI-driven workspaces, and homepage."
"In terms of features, GP offers a wide range of strong capabilities, particularly in the financial module."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics AX is customization."
"There's a moderate amount of scalability available."
"The stability is very good."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Dynamics AX are field services and the vendor collaboration portal. Both of the features are very good."
"The most valuable feature for us is the manufacturing module. It addresses our product costing for tuna canning."
"This solution's most valuable feature is its workflow for purchase orders and inventory."
"Lowers costs, produces higher efficiencies, while maintaining a leaner staff and produces advanced financials."
"Inventory management in NetSuite OneWorld is one of the best in the industry, so this feature is what I like most about the solution."
"Allows us to use it the way we need to instead of changing our needs and processes to fit the product."
"The ability to customize it to create custom fields that are reportable, and then to be able to write script behind it to automate other processes that might otherwise be manual is great."
"NetSuite OneWorld is a single instance that allows you to do different business functions, such as reporting, order-to-cash, design-build, and procure-to-pay. This feature is what's most valuable in the solution."
"The executive dashboards have satisfied the founders and leadership with up to the minute information. This allows them to make high level decisions."
"NetSuite OneWorld, the consolidation feature has been incredibly valuable. However, I cannot speak to the full range of features and functionalities offered by OneWorld as I am not familiar with all of them. I have utilized OneWorld primarily in the biotech industry, with a focus on operating expenses and financial reporting, such as capital contributions and foreign currency adjustments. I am confident, however, that OneWorld offers a robust module for reporting and consolidating revenue, though I have not had the opportunity to directly utilize this aspect of the software."
"We've set up Jira integration and used robotic process automation (RPA) to streamline various processes, like procurement and invoicing. Some processes still require manual approval, like supplier invoices, but we're simplifying those too. We're also exploring integrating with other tools like Power BI for better data analytics and reporting. Currently, our automation focuses on general tasks, not document understanding or anything complex like that."
"The product takes some training to get up to speed on all functionality and modules in Microsoft Dynamics AX 2012 ERP system."
"There is no Arabic interface in Microsoft Business Central, which is a big weak point."
"Microsoft needs more presence in our region to help with management and maintenance."
"The product must be made accessible online."
"The integration could improve for the future."
"Change management could be better."
"There is also slowness in database backup."
"If I had to add something in the next release, it would probably be a mobile application for a sister application of Dynamics 365; not the ERP but the Dynamics 365 HR solution. It would definitely help if we could have Microsoft or a Microsoft partner introduce a mobile application for it."
"Some entities are not available for multiple subsidiaries, which requires duplication."
"NetSuite OneWorld, the consolidation feature has been incredibly valuable. However, I cannot speak to the full range of features and functionalities offered by OneWorld as I am not familiar with all of them. I have utilized OneWorld primarily in the biotech industry, with a focus on operating expenses and financial reporting, such as capital contributions and foreign currency adjustments. I am confident, however, that OneWorld offers a robust module for reporting and consolidating revenue, though I have not had the opportunity to directly utilize this aspect of the software."
"The Project Management User Interface is lacking."
"Certain analytics features are missing that I've come to expect from other systems. Additionally, there are occasional issues with data accuracy that need to be addressed. Overall, deeper analytics capabilities would greatly improve the tool's usefulness for me."
"In NetSuite OneWorld, what needs improvement is the production planning functionality."
"If you were to use standard costs, it doesn't handle standard costs well."
"The solution could improve by having more integration."
"I don’t like the SaaS models. Of course, they make the tool powerful enough to run a billion-dollar business. The tool is cheaper than SAP or Core."
Microsoft Dynamics AX is ranked 6th in ERP with 51 reviews while NetSuite OneWorld is ranked 14th in ERP with 13 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics AX is rated 7.6, while NetSuite OneWorld is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics AX writes "A stable product that offers excellent ROI and reliable technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetSuite OneWorld writes "Customizable with great integration capabilities and very good stability". Microsoft Dynamics AX is most compared with SAP ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, whereas NetSuite OneWorld is most compared with NetSuite ERP, SAP Business One, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and SAP S/4HANA. See our Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. NetSuite OneWorld report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
