We performed a comparison between Microsoft Dynamics AX and Microsoft Dynamics GP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature I've found is the UI functionality."
"A valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics AX is that it is stable."
"The installation is extremely simple, and I have had no problems with it."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics AX is customization."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics AX is that it fulfills our requirements. We haven't had any issues with performance."
"If anyone is familiar with Microsoft products then they can handle it easily."
"Dynamics AX provides a lot of functionality."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Dynamics AX are field services and the vendor collaboration portal. Both of the features are very good."
"The stability was reliable."
"The fixed assets, payroll, the data module, and user-friendliness are most valuable."
"Microsoft Dynamics AX can improve system performance and security. The security is basic and needs a lot of improvement."
"The older version of Microsoft Dynamics AX that we are using is not as scalable as the newer version."
"Microsoft Dynamics AX could be improved by having more features available. We are going to 365 now, to use all the modules, because we found that there weren't many new things we were able to develop with AX. There were a lot of things that weren't available, so we are moving and integrating other things. The customization of upgrades should also be faster. We would also like to see more security features."
"If I had to add something in the next release, it would probably be a mobile application for a sister application of Dynamics 365; not the ERP but the Dynamics 365 HR solution. It would definitely help if we could have Microsoft or a Microsoft partner introduce a mobile application for it."
"The support here in Turkey could be better. However, the international support is good."
"At times there are issues related to reporting, sometimes with the integration between two or three modules, and sometimes to the logic itself."
"There should be the capability for users to enhance the application by using a low-code or no-code product from the Microsoft family."
"They should include some modules related to solving customer problems or resolving support tickets from our customers — like a help desk for ERPs."
"This is now a legacy product, so they're phasing it out over time."
"There should also be extra redundancy when posting to modules. We use different sets of books such as CashBook and CheckBooks therefore if I select the wrong one the solution allows the transaction to just pass without warning."
Microsoft Dynamics AX is ranked 8th in ERP with 20 reviews while Microsoft Dynamics GP is ranked 24th in ERP with 2 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics AX is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Dynamics GP is rated 5.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics AX writes "Provides a lot of functionality". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics GP writes "Outdated with bad UI and poor scalability". Microsoft Dynamics AX is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle ERP Cloud, Oracle E-Business Suite and Infor M3, whereas Microsoft Dynamics GP is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, PeopleSoft, Oracle E-Business Suite and NetSuite ERP. See our Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
