MSP360 Backup vs Microsoft DPM comparison

Microsoft and MSP360 are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Microsoft is ranked #41 with an average rating of 7.8, while MSP360 is ranked #56. Microsoft holds a 0.9% mindshare in BRS, compared to MSP360’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 73% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of MSP360 users who would recommend it.

Microsoft DPM

Read 21 Microsoft DPM reviews

3,538 Views
3,184 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

MSP360 Backup

Read 15 MSP360 Backup reviews

4,516 Views
2,755 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft DPM

MSP360 Backup

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Microsoft DPM and MSP360 Backup are both active in the data protection market. MSP360 Backup is often preferred for its robust features and ease of deployment, whereas Microsoft DPM is favored in environments tightly integrated with Microsoft products.

Features: Microsoft DPM offers seamless integration with Microsoft ecosystems, efficient backup and disaster recovery specifically for Windows servers and clients, and strong data protection within these environments. MSP360 Backup stands out due to its versatile cloud integrations, cross-platform support, and flexible backup management options suitable for various platforms and storage solutions. Its dashboard offers intuitive management of backups across diverse environments.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft DPM could enhance its non-Microsoft platform support, simplify its setup process, and improve flexibility for cloud storage. It may also address the issues transient in updates affecting older versions. MSP360 Backup could benefit from expanding its integration with enterprise security solutions, optimizing its interface for more advanced configurations, and reducing its reliance on third-party cloud services for storage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MSP360 Backup provides a straightforward, cloud-based deployment process that minimizes setup complexity and ongoing maintenance. Its customer service is well-regarded for its responsive and comprehensive support. Microsoft DPM requires a more involved deployment process due to its on-premises nature, but it benefits from a cohesive support system grounded in the Microsoft environment.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft DPM typically incurs a higher initial investment due to its close integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, but it offers cost-effective long-term value for organizations heavily relying on Microsoft infrastructure. MSP360 Backup, on the other hand, features a scalable pricing model with flexible subscription options that often result in a favorable return on investment, particularly for businesses using a wide range of backup environments.

To learn more, read our detailed MSP360 Backup vs. Microsoft DPM Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup vs. Microsoft DPM

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft DPM

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

41st

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MSP360 Backup

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

56th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (44th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (33rd), MSP Backup (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Microsoft DPM is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MSP360 Backup is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft DPM	0.9%
MSP360 Backup	1.1%
Other	98.0%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Nirukshitha Gamage

Senior Manager - System Infrastructure Software Support Team at DMS Electronics (Pvt) Ltd

User finds setup straightforward but seeks wider platform support and advanced features

Microsoft DPM could implement backup capabilities for third-party systems such as Linux. They also need to consider other features such as replication to DR sites, similar to what Veeam and other products offer. Microsoft DPM didn't have that capability at that time. If they want to remain competitive in the market, they need to observe the competition and implement improvements. The backup should have compression, deduplication, and DR replication. They should also improve monitoring of the environment. Microsoft DPM didn't have these basics at that time. If they had continued development on the products, they could have reached a higher level, especially given Microsoft's significant presence and majority of servers. Microsoft DPM didn't have any support structure in the backend. If they had a support structure, we could have escalated issues. I never received any support from Microsoft DPM.

Read full review

CONRAD FORREST

President at MTS Consulting Group, Inc.

The solution provides the ability to backup all types of cloud drives, is inexpensive, and has decent support

MSP360 Backup provides the backup functionality, but we need to provide the storage component. We can use Azure, AWS, or another provider, but we need to choose the storage provider and create a bucket to store our data. The vendor is making changes to improve the functionality of the service and the separation of storage, but I would like to see more integration and a knowledge base of the tool. Currently trying to understand why the storage is separated and how to implement the storage properly is a challenge. Using the solution incurs additional charges for the device storage and backup which are not included in the service. Unlike other solutions such as Kohl which includes everything at one price. MSP360 Backup can be improved by adding inclusive pricing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I could back up all the stuff we had, even the VMs we have for Hyper V."

"Overall, I really like the product, it's very user-friendly, and I can do everything I need to do."

"The most important feature is that it's easy to use."

"The initial setup is quite straightforward."

"The solution really does great recovery."

"The solution backs up Microsoft workloads as well as anything on the market."

"The most valuable feature is the recovery."

"The most valuable feature is the total integration of the System Center solution."

More Microsoft DPM pros

"I liked the way the product worked, its flexibility on the storage and cost, and the way it was supported."

"The initial setup is very easy. It's not overly complex."

"It has allowed me to implement a cost effective, highly configurable solution."

"I would recommend the solution; it's a very trustworthy solution."

"The solution is simple to use and easy to configure."

"Block level transfers have significantly reduced the amount of time for transfers over some other solutions"

"The feature that I have found most valuable is its online backup capacity because you don't have to do an entire backup again and again, it just does whatever you type in, you type a, it goes a, you type b, it goes b. It doesn't take an entire site up again and again. So that incremental and bit by bit backup is important, it is a nice feature here."

"MSP360 is vastly cheaper than its competitors and has almost all the same features."

More MSP360 Backup pros

Cons

"Management reporting could be improved."

"To evaluate the solution's abilities and its performance under demanding conditions, it is recommended to carry out a stress test."

"Overall, I wouldn't describe the solution as user-friendly. It's not very intuitive."

"The user interface can be improved quite a bit."

"The DPM is pretty good, but when it comes to external devices, you can't back up to the external device."

"They could improve the compatibility and integration with other products and the ability to do file-to file backups of other products."

"The real hands-on experience with DPM is that it's difficult to set up unless you get it right first time, the agent processes gobble CPU and i/o, and if you're unfortunate enough for your DPM primary to go awol, you're faced with building a complete DPM network again because the secondary/ies will refuse full backups if the primary isn't there."

"Microsoft DPM could improve by adding S3 backup to S3 storage capabilities."

More Microsoft DPM cons

"Using the solution incurs additional charges for the device storage and backup which are not included in the service."

"The other issue is that I don't like the implementation of the SQL backup."

"The solution needs a better graphical user interface. It's a graphical user interface that is very old-school right now. They could give it a little more modern feel."

"Maybe implement an easier interface for basic users. For example, a set-up wizard with all the commonly used features as default."

"If I have an incident and I need to restore something very fast, I want to restore a particular virtual machine, maybe in an hour and that is not possible to do with MSP360."

"The graphics are looking a bit old and should be updated."

"The restore time could improve. When we had an issue the restore time was lengthy."

"There are some things that we don't like about it. That is why I was exploring alternatives in a hyper-scale environment. That is why I was checking IT Central Station."

More MSP360 Backup cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft DPM can be considered as an expensive solution for smaller or medium enterprises, but we have been satisfied with the price structure as it is fixed and it offers a variety of useful features"

"I think Microsoft DPM pricing is reasonable. The additional costs are related to storage and technical support."

"Microsoft DPM is a free solution. However, we pay approximately $3,000 annually for support."

"It includes a standard licensing fee. Once a year, there is a rebranding fee. The licensing costs are available on the internet for MSP360 Backup. There is a discount structure where if you have over 50 devices, you get a 50% discount. So, my cost is $2 a license per month."

"Pricing is reasonable although can be quite a large upfront cost."

"MSP360 is vastly cheaper than its competitors and has almost all the same features."

"The cost is pretty inexpensive. Around four to five dollars per device, per workstation on each server."

"I rate the price of MSP360 Backup a seven out of ten."

"The solution is expensive."

"We have a very good return on investment."

"It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup."

More MSP360 Backup pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Construction Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft DPM?

The pricing of Microsoft solutions rates in the middle range at five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft DPM?

Microsoft DPM could improve by adding S3 backup to S3 storage capabilities. AI integration is not necessary for backups as this is not a security solution.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft DPM?

We use Microsoft DPM for backup servers. ManageEngine is used to manage workstations and servers, and Operation Manager is used for monitoring.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 8% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 4% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Data Protector vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 3% of the time

Catalogic DPX vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft DPM Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 5% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 4% of the time

Backup4all vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 3% of the time

GoodSync For Business vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 3% of the time

BDRShield vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 3% of the time

More MSP360 Backup Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft DPM

June 2026

Download Microsoft DPM product report

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup

June 2026

Download MSP360 Backup product report

Also Known As

DPM, Data Protection Manager, MS DPM

Cloudberry Backup

Overview

Microsoft DPM is a comprehensive backup and recovery software that integrates seamlessly with Microsoft applications, providing efficient recovery capabilities and ensuring compatibility across workloads.

Microsoft's Data Protection Manager offers significant integration capabilities with Microsoft applications and Azure Active Directory for Single Sign-On, enhancing scalability through integration with System Center. It supports streamlined backup solutions for both physical and virtual Microsoft environments, with automated operations and a user-friendly interface. While DPM showcases robust file search capabilities, time-saving functionalities, and enhanced security measures, improvements are needed in third-party integrations, backup for external devices, and affordable cloud storage options. Enterprises might face challenges due to complex configurations and limited user-community support.

What are the key features of Microsoft DPM?

Seamless integration with Microsoft Apps: Provides straightforward integration for enhanced operational efficiency.
Efficient Recovery Capabilities: Enables quick data restoration to minimize downtime.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Facilitates Single Sign-On for easier access control.
Compatibility with System Center: Enhances scalability and management efficiency.
Automated Operations: Streamlines backup processes, reducing manual effort.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Strong file search capabilities contribute to data protection.
Time-Saving: Quick recovery processes improve operational efficiency.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies backup management for IT teams.

In industries such as consulting, local government, and data centers, Microsoft DPM plays a critical role in managing backup and recovery operations. Organizations rely on it to safeguard environments, including ERP systems and virtual machines, by supporting daily, weekly, and incremental backups, disaster recovery, and data replication across physical Windows Servers, Hyper-V Servers, SharePoint, and more.

Microsoft

MSP360 Backup offers peer-to-peer backup, client-side encryption, and seamless integration with top cloud storage providers, appealing for its ease of use, minimal setup, and robust capabilities.

MSP360 Backup is designed for disaster recovery, workstation, and server backup in cloud environments. Organizations benefit from its compatibility with storage options such as OneDrive, Google Drive, and AWS, supporting incremental backups and ensuring secure data with client-side encryption. The platform facilitates error notifications and corrections, making it a reliable choice for backing up critical information. Despite its effectiveness, users see room for improvement in interface design, bug fixes in the Linux version, and support for more cloud providers.

What are the key features of MSP360 Backup?

Peer-to-Peer Backup: Enables direct data transfer between systems without intermediary servers.
Client-Side Encryption: Protects data by encrypting it before transmission.
Block-Level Transfers: Reduces backup times by only transferring parts of changed files.
Cloud Integration: Compatible with OneDrive, Google Drive, AWS for flexible storage choices.
Incremental Backups: Streamlines configuration and minimizes storage by updating only changes.
Reliable Scheduling: Offers robust scheduling options for automated backups.

What benefits should users look for in MSP360 Backup reviews?

User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of navigation with minimal learning curve.
Efficient Error Alerts: Helps quickly identify and resolve backup errors.
Technical Support: Provides excellent customer service for troubleshooting and guidance.
Backup Flexibility: Offers varied backup methods tailored to individual organizational needs.

In industry applications, organizations employ MSP360 Backup for virtual machine, physical computer, and confidential data management. It is used extensively for offsite backups by micro enterprises and integrates well for client data management, virtual machine, and SQL backup purposes, especially useful for daily monitoring post migrations.

MSP360

Sample Customers

Medical Park, Centropol Energy, a.s., NCFE, D & H Distributing, Metalor, Colosseum, a.s., Sanitas S.A., Icebreaker

StratX

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup vs. Microsoft DPM

June 2026

Free Report: MSP360 Backup vs. Microsoft DPM

Find out what your peers are saying about MSP360 Backup vs. Microsoft DPM and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MSP360 Backup vs. Microsoft DPM report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.