Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft DPM based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Veeam Data Platform, Commvault Cloud, and Rubrik.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Microsoft DPM surpasses its competitors by offering robust data protection and seamless integration with Windows ecosystems, providing efficient backup and recovery solutions that enhance IT infrastructure and ensure data integrity across complex hybrid environments.
Microsoft Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Microsoft DPM excels in integration with Microsoft products and suits smaller, Windows-focused setups. In comparison, Veeam Data Platform appeals to diverse environments with strong virtualization support and advanced cloud capabilities. DPM offers cost-effective solutions, while Veeam delivers higher ROI with comprehensive functionalities.
Commvault Cloud offers comprehensive data protection with versatile cloud integration, appealing to those needing robust hybrid solutions. In comparison, Microsoft DPM caters to Microsoft-centric enterprises, providing seamless migration and protection for Microsoft workloads, offering cost-effective solutions for existing Microsoft infrastructure users.
Commvault Cloud generally has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft DPM, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Commvault's pricing reflects its extensive feature set, while DPM appeals to those prioritizing budget efficiency.
Commvault Cloud generally has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft DPM, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Commvault's pricing reflects its extensive feature set, while DPM appeals to those prioritizing budget efficiency.
Microsoft DPM attracts budget-conscious tech buyers due to its cost-effectiveness and strong Microsoft integration. In comparison, Rubrik offers superior automation and cloud integration, appealing to those valuing advanced features and improved customer service despite the higher investment.
Acronis Cyber Protect attracts enterprises with its security, comprehensive features, and cross-platform support. In comparison, Microsoft DPM integrates well within Microsoft-centric setups and provides cost benefits in such environments. A tech buyer might choose Acronis for flexibility, whereas Microsoft DPM suits existing Microsoft users.
Acronis Cyber Protect typically incurs a higher setup cost than Microsoft DPM, making it a more expensive initial investment, while Microsoft DPM offers a more budget-friendly option for those prioritizing lower initial expenses.
Acronis Cyber Protect typically incurs a higher setup cost than Microsoft DPM, making it a more expensive initial investment, while Microsoft DPM offers a more budget-friendly option for those prioritizing lower initial expenses.
Microsoft DPM excels in integrating with Microsoft environments, offering cost-effective protection for Microsoft applications. In comparison, Dell PowerProtect Data Manager provides versatile advanced features across virtual and cloud environments, appealing to businesses seeking comprehensive functionality despite potentially higher costs and complex deployment.
Microsoft DPM is ideal for seamless integration in Microsoft environments, focused on simplicity and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Veritas NetBackup appeals to larger, multi-platform businesses, offering flexibility and extensive support for complex environments, justifying its higher initial investment with long-term scalability.
Microsoft DPM typically involves lower setup costs compared to Veritas NetBackup, which often has a higher initial investment. This cost disparity highlights budget considerations between the two solutions.
Microsoft DPM typically involves lower setup costs compared to Veritas NetBackup, which often has a higher initial investment. This cost disparity highlights budget considerations between the two solutions.
Microsoft DPM is affordable, supporting Windows-based systems, making it ideal for Microsoft-reliant enterprises. In comparison, Cohesity DataProtect excels in diverse, multi-cloud environments, offering advanced features like ransomware protection, suitable for companies seeking comprehensive data management and higher ROI through long-term value.
Microsoft DPM offers a cost-effective setup compared to Cohesity DataProtect, which is known for its comprehensive and more expensive installation process, highlighting a clear distinction in setup investment for users considering these solutions.
Microsoft DPM offers a cost-effective setup compared to Cohesity DataProtect, which is known for its comprehensive and more expensive installation process, highlighting a clear distinction in setup investment for users considering these solutions.
Dell Avamar excels with strong deduplication, optimizing storage in bandwidth-limited environments. In comparison, Microsoft DPM’s strength lies in seamless Microsoft integration, beneficial for businesses already using Microsoft products. Avamar suits those needing efficient storage, while DPM attracts users with existing Microsoft investments.
Dell Avamar's setup costs are generally higher compared to Microsoft DPM, making DPM a more budget-friendly option for initial setup. However, Avamar offers robust features that may justify its higher setup expenses.
Dell Avamar's setup costs are generally higher compared to Microsoft DPM, making DPM a more budget-friendly option for initial setup. However, Avamar offers robust features that may justify its higher setup expenses.
Microsoft DPM integrates seamlessly with Microsoft ecosystems, suitable for those deeply invested in Windows environments. In comparison, N-able Cove Data Protection offers a cloud-centric approach with rapid recovery and flexible scalability, ideal for businesses prioritizing adaptability and cloud-based solutions.
Microsoft DPM has higher setup costs than N-able Cove Data Protection, providing comprehensive features. N-able Cove Data Protection, however, offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to businesses with cost constraints.
Microsoft DPM has higher setup costs than N-able Cove Data Protection, providing comprehensive features. N-able Cove Data Protection, however, offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to businesses with cost constraints.
Veritas Backup Exec offers broad features like multi-platform compatibility and efficient backups for Windows, Linux, and VMware. In comparison, Microsoft DPM is closely integrated with Microsoft environments, offering effective data protection for Microsoft workloads and cost-effectiveness through existing Enterprise Agreements.
Veritas Backup Exec has a lower setup cost than Microsoft DPM, making it a more budget-friendly choice, while Microsoft DPM provides more comprehensive features despite its higher setup expense.
Veritas Backup Exec has a lower setup cost than Microsoft DPM, making it a more budget-friendly choice, while Microsoft DPM provides more comprehensive features despite its higher setup expense.
Microsoft DPM excels with enterprise-level capabilities and seamless Microsoft service integration. In comparison, Synology DSM offers a feature-rich platform appealing to small to medium-sized businesses with efficient, scalable data solutions and budget-friendly costs for immediate value.
Microsoft DPM involves higher initial setup costs, while Synology DSM typically offers a more budget-friendly installation. The cost difference highlights Microsoft's enterprise focus compared to Synology's more accessible approach for smaller businesses or personal use.
Microsoft DPM involves higher initial setup costs, while Synology DSM typically offers a more budget-friendly installation. The cost difference highlights Microsoft's enterprise focus compared to Synology's more accessible approach for smaller businesses or personal use.
Arcserve UDP is ideal for those needing flexibility and virtualization platform support, offering features like deduplication and instant recovery. In comparison, Microsoft DPM suits organizations within the Microsoft ecosystem, emphasizing seamless integration and effective backup for Microsoft workloads.
Microsoft DPM offers strong integration within Windows environments and supports cloud backup with Azure. In comparison, Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup focuses on user-friendly design and efficient VM backup, appealing to those seeking simplicity and rapid deployment.
Microsoft DPM involves a higher initial setup cost, while Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup offers a more budget-friendly installation, highlighting a significant cost difference.
Microsoft DPM involves a higher initial setup cost, while Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup offers a more budget-friendly installation, highlighting a significant cost difference.
Microsoft DPM is cost-effective, offering easy deployment and integration within Microsoft frameworks. In comparison, Oracle Data Guard provides advanced features, including automatic failover and extensive disaster recovery capabilities, appealing to buyers needing robust data protection and willing to invest in comprehensive solutions.
Microsoft DPM typically offers a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, while Oracle Data Guard's setup involves higher initial costs, reflecting its focus on robust enterprise-level data protection features.
Microsoft DPM typically offers a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, while Oracle Data Guard's setup involves higher initial costs, reflecting its focus on robust enterprise-level data protection features.
