OpenText Application Quality Management and TestRail are notable tools in application quality and test case management. TestRail generally seems more favorable because its feature set justifies the cost.
Features: OpenText AQM provides comprehensive traceability, robust API capabilities, and extensive customization, ideal for large organizations. TestRail is known for its ease of use, seamless Jira integration, and effective test case management, making it suitable for smaller teams. Both are highly customizable, but TestRail's user-friendly design and integration capabilities make it adaptable for various user needs, including integration with automation tools.
Room for Improvement: OpenText AQM faces challenges with high licensing costs and complex project tracking. TestRail users suggest improvements in reporting and API integration. OpenText AQM's pricing model and platform complexity are specific areas for enhancement, while TestRail may enhance its defect management and administrative features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText AQM offers both on-premises and cloud deployment options but struggles with inconsistent customer support. TestRail favors cloud deployment with quick customer service, leading to a positive user experience. TestRail's cloud-centric approach often results in simpler deployment, while its customer service is more responsive and consistent, improving user satisfaction.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText AQM’s high price can be challenging for smaller companies, while TestRail's flexible monthly subscriptions are more accessible. OpenText AQM users find value in improved project visibility, but TestRail's pricing strategy promotes significant ROI, saving time and enhancing test management efficiency. TestRail is seen as more cost-effective for smaller teams compared to OpenText AQM.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Time-wise, it saves about fifteen to twenty percent compared to Excel, and money-wise, it's around ten percent.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
I personally escalate Leapwork issues with the Leapwork support tech team, and they are very quick to solve problems.
Sometimes, you really need to speak to a person, and arranging such calls is not easy.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
When I started automation testing in my current company, we only had 10-20 automated test cases integrated with TestRail, but we gradually increased to 100, 200, 1000, and 2000 cases.
I have never experienced any issues with its scalability.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
It has never had any issues.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
I would appreciate AI features that help design test cases based on documented requirements.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
It offers good value for money.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
The reporting capabilities and the simplicity of it make it user-friendly, as new users can easily understand the tool.
It significantly saves effort in managing test execution and managing all test cases.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Application Quality Management | 12.7% |
| TestRail | 10.5% |
| Other | 76.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 161 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.
Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
