Katalon Test Ops vs TestRail comparison

"It's more user-friendly as a solution."

"Katalon Test Ops has AI features that speed up the process by automating tasks that would otherwise be done manually."

"I noticed that only the enterprise version has integration with GitHub."

"You don't need to follow complex procedures to create a test run, test case, etc."

"I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager."

"This is a user friendly solution."

"Reliable and stable. It is important that TestRail be up and running 24/7 as we have users around the world using it."

"I use the solution for test management."

"I was on the lookout for automation testing on the browser and I believe this tool is very interesting in that matter. The solution is useful for UI testing. You just need to add the URL that is to be checked."

"Most valuable features are the ease of organizing test cases and a great API for sending results from automated test run results into the database."

"The API to support integration of the homemade automated testing tool."

"The execution module of Katalon Test Ops may need some improvement, especially when running a high volume of test scripts."

"There are stability troubles. My area does not have a good connection. That's why sometimes I face issues."

"The free version is limited."

"Their customer support could be improved. Sometimes we struggle with that. It could be faster. Whenever we raise any query, they get back to you but the turnaround time is very slow."

"I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira, which haven't been permanently resolved yet."

"The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting."

"There are a number of improvements that have been requested. While I don't have a list of these requests available, many can be found on Gurock's forum."

"The TestRail API to integrate reporting of automated tests is complete, but requires many requests to identify the appropriate entry."

"I've encountered at some point, some difficulties on the administration side, but I don't remember exactly what they were."

"I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation tools, which is not there in ALM with UFT. Instead of setting it up as a project and using it, we set it up as a system for usability. It also lacks in the traceability aspect. For traceability, you need to use the JIRA plugin and drag traceability on JIRA, but the functionality is still quite limited. The biggest gap is mainframe testing. It would be good if I could start with mainframe testing. Manual granting of access is another issue. There is no API that I could use with another system where it is automated. There is an API for loading somebody to a project but not for adding to the application."

"Customer support could be enhanced. All the support is provided via chat and emails. Sometimes, you really need to speak to a person, and arranging such calls is not easy."

"The product is not much expensive."

"Its price is definitely not more. If they introduce automation, they can charge more."

"The price of the solution is based on how many users you have per year. When you grow, it is segmented, For example, 10 to 25, you have a price, and more than 50, or 100, you need to take the enterprise license. I don't think we will reach this point."

"I give the price a five out of ten."

"The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features."

"The solution is quite reasonably priced for what it offers and offers a monthly subscription model."

"Pricing for small teams seems correct with respect to competitors."

"Use TestRail Cloud (online TR hosted server) and don't worry about maintenance or scalability. It saves a lot of cash and time."