OpenText Application Quality Management and OpenText Software Delivery Management are both competitive solutions in application lifecycle management. Based on the features, pricing, and scalability, OpenText Software Delivery Management holds an advantage due to its broad integration capabilities and agile support.
Features: OpenText Application Quality Management offers bug traceability, web accessibility, and extensive API integration. It is highly customizable and supports requirements management. OpenText Software Delivery Management boasts broad integration capabilities, agile methodologies support, and scalability for larger organizations.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Application Quality Management struggles with high licensing costs, a complex user interface, and browser compatibility issues. Reporting capabilities also need enhancement. OpenText Software Delivery Management faces high pricing and requires improvements in functionality and user feedback mechanisms.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Application Quality Management provides deployment options like public cloud, private cloud, and on-premises solutions. Its customer service is inconsistent but technical support is reliable. OpenText Software Delivery Management's primary deployment is on-premises, which limits flexibility for cloud-first organizations, though its customer service is reportedly improving.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Application Quality Management is considered expensive, impacting smaller companies. The features justify the investment despite high costs. OpenText Software Delivery Management also faces pricing concerns but offers a flexible licensing model, potentially being more economical for large enterprises. Both solutions enhance test processes and collaboration, offering a positive ROI.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
The ability to generate audit evidence with a single click saves ten days of work for ten people, enabling them to focus on other tasks.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
We can expand the number of servers and resources as required.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
Its ability to generate audit evidence with a single click is a significant advantage, as it saves considerable time and money compared to manual processes.
OpenText Application Quality Management offers extensive capabilities in test management, automation tool integration, and defect traceability, providing an efficient and user-friendly experience for tracking and managing testing workflows.
The platform supports test management by integrating with automation tools and managing the traceability of defects and requirements. It facilitates users with linking test cases to defects, uploading from Excel, and generating customizable reports, which enhances efficiency. Business Process Testing and requirement capturing for test cases further extend its capabilities. Users report concerns about its integration with other tools, particularly in DevOps and agile frameworks, as well as challenges with its complex interface and high cost. Improved integration, better browser compatibility, upgraded dashboards, and enhanced support for agile methodologies are recommended by many users.
What are the most important features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, organizations apply OpenText Application Quality Management for test management, planning, and automation. It is an essential tool for managing test scenarios, recording results, and supporting both manual and automated testing processes. This tool aids in regression testing, ensuring requirement traceability and acting as a repository for executing test cycles, thereby supporting robust quality assurance practices.
OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.
Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.
What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
