Loom Systems vs vRealize Network Insight comparison

ServiceNow and VMware are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. ServiceNow is ranked #62, while VMware is ranked #41 with an average rating of 8.7. ServiceNow holds a 0.3% mindshare in IM, compared to VMware’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of ServiceNow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of VMware users who would recommend it.

Loom Systems

Read 4 Loom Systems reviews

518 Views
342 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

vRealize Network Insight

Read 46 vRealize Network Insight reviews

1,784 Views
785 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Loom Systems

vRealize Network Insight

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

vRealize Network Insight and Loom Systems compete in network analytics and monitoring. vRealize Network Insight holds a pricing and support advantage, while Loom Systems is superior in features, providing comprehensive functionalities.

Features: vRealize Network Insight offers network visualization, troubleshooting, and planning, which enhance network performance and security insights. Loom Systems provides robust AI-driven analytics, predictive maintenance, and issue prevention capabilities, offering an edge in predictive insights.

Room for Improvement: vRealize Network Insight could enhance AI integration, develop more intuitive interfaces, and improve troubleshooting depth. Loom Systems may focus on lowering its price point, expanding network-specific features, and offering more detailed network planning tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: vRealize Network Insight ensures a seamless deployment with extensive integration options suitable for diverse environments. Loom Systems facilitates quick deployment with intuitive setup processes and strong customer service, prioritizing ease of use.

Pricing and ROI: vRealize Network Insight features flexible pricing models with lower upfront costs, providing ROI through efficient resource use. Loom Systems, priced higher, offers significant ROI through predictive maintenance features, potentially reducing downtime costs and operational disruptions.

To learn more, read our detailed Loom Systems vs. vRealize Network Insight Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Loom Systems vs. vRealize Network Insight

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,077 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Loom Systems

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

62nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anomaly Detection Tools (2nd)

vRealize Network Insight

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

41st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (38th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Loom Systems is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of vRealize Network Insight is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Keerthi Kumar Sangaraju

Technology Manager at FIS

Stable, easy to set up, flexible, and has multiple functionalities, but needs to define priority levels for each incident

What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority.

Read full review

NiteshKumar1

Principle consultant at Infosys

The tool's configuration is easy and artifacts are easily accessible through professional services and the web

The product is highly regarded, and many customers have been using it along with other VMware products like vSphere and VMware vCloud Usage Insight. However, recently, there's been a trend among customers, especially those using VMware for a considerable period, to explore the potential of migrating to the public cloud. The common concern among these customers is how the VMware products will perform in the public cloud environment. Migrating instances from VMware to different platforms is not easy, especially when dealing with many instances across multiple customers. Customers are keen to maintain the functionality of their existing VMware products but prefer to run them on the public cloud instead of on-premise servers. Our clients for vRealize Network Insight are enterprise businesses. I rate it a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is absolutely scalable. If an organization needs to expand it out they definitely can."

"You can develop your own apps within Loom, and they can be configured very simply."

"What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring. I also like that it's a flexible solution."

"The RFS portion of the solution is the product's most valuable feature."

"vRNI can trace the flow of each and every packet and it is easy for us to troubleshoot all the issues that we do have with the networking. We can trace down the packet to a point where it has been dropped."

"It allowed us to set up NSX and to do microsegmentation, without all of the pain points of having to determine each port and each IP address that needed to have access, and which ones needed to be blocked."

"The solution has helped improve our organization by directing the network traffic using SDN."

"We haven't had any complaints about the stability of the solution or heard of any issues. None of our clients have mentioned running into bugs or glitches. There haven't been crashes."

"The most valuable features are the packet trace flow and that the view of the whole environment is deep."

"It provides deep visibility into what is happening with traffic and helps us manage our network."

"The automation collects all the relationships between servers, allowing us to visualize these relationships and organize the migration into waves."

"I find it user-friendly and intuitive. With the GUI interface that we do use on a regular basis, it's easy to navigate, it's easy to see, easy to query. We get reports. It's easy to use."

More vRealize Network Insight pros

Cons

"The change management within the solution needs to be improved. There needs to be more process automation."

"The discovery and mapping still takes a lot of human intervention, it's quite resource heavy,"

"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority."

"The reporting is a bit weak. They should work to improve this aspect of the product."

"There is room for improvement when it comes to pricing because we pay here in Brazil, and all the costs are based on the dollar."

"I would like to see them expand the capabilities to infrastructure types other than just VMware."

"Support could be much better."

"I would like to see more reporting features, more dashboards."

"Since Broadcom acquired VMware, it has been experiencing challenges. Many sales processes are not well defined."

"The compatibility with each and every component of the infrastructure is the main thing that I am looking for. I would like them to make sure that it's compatible with different kinds of storage systems, etc. I have seen the compatibility list. I feel it can be more compatible than it is right now."

"There are some random glitches in the Web UI, but they are usually pretty cosmetic in nature. I don't really seem to use any browser other than Chrome with it. I also get some weird errors from time to time on the hardware NetFlow Collectors, where it doesn't sync data."

"I want to see more in terms of microsegmentation. As of now, I can see the rules, but they are not in a readable format that I can convert to microsegmentation and can fit into NSX Manager."

More vRealize Network Insight cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It has brought more money into our company."

"We have spent less time investigating network flows, so it is absolutely cost-effective."

"It's an expensive product because we have a lot of nodes."

"The solution has helped us to reduce time, increase performance, reduce costs, and even easily manage networks. We are probably seeing 10 to 20 percent labor savings because we are able to be very specific and focused on what we want to do. It ends up saving the customer money and makes us be more efficient on our cost deliveries."

"They should include the product in NSX because it's important to have it for deployment."

"I rate vRealize Network Insight's pricing a seven point five out of ten."

"It's a little expensive, but for what you're getting out of the product, you often see the trade-off. It depends on the type of licensing you have. It might be a little too pricey for some."

"Cost always has room for improvement, you could always make it cheaper. But I think it's a good value for what you pay for it."

More vRealize Network Insight pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Real Estate/Law Firm

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about vRealize Network Insight?

The tool's ease of configuration and use and the availability of information and artifacts through professional services and the web are key factors that customers find valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for vRealize Network Insight?

Broadcom is known for increasing product prices, making them expensive compared to what people used to pay. I liken the subscription model to not truly owning what you pay for.

See all answers

What needs improvement with vRealize Network Insight?

Right now, I do not see a specific area for improvement. My main concern is understanding the intentions of Broadcom, which has acquired VMware. Broadcom should improve by going back to what was wo...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs Loom Systems

Compared 50% of the time

Huawei eSight vs Loom Systems

Compared 50% of the time

More Loom Systems Competitors

ThousandEyes vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 13% of the time

DX NetOps vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 9% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 9% of the time

DX Spectrum vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 9% of the time

More vRealize Network Insight Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

June 2025

Download Loom Systems product report

Buyer's Guide

vRealize Network Insight

June 2025

Download vRealize Network Insight product report

Also Known As

No data available

Arkin

Overview

Loom Systems delivers an advanced AI-powered operational analytics platform to predict and prevent problems in the digital business. DevOps & IT teams use Loom for real-time detection and resolution for any type of application, including home-grown. Loom analyzes logs and metrics in all formats, performs smart correlations and root cause analysis to help organizations gain immediate into their environments. Loom stands alone in the industry as an AI platform requiring no prior math knowledge from its operators, leveraging your existing staff to succeed in the digital era. Getting started is easy - zero configuration and data pre-processing needed, so you can stream your data in its raw format.

ServiceNow

VMware vRealize Network Insight delivers intelligent operations for software-defined networking and security. It helps customers build an optimized, highly-available and secure network infrastructure across multi-cloud environments. It accelerates micro-segmentation planning and deployment, enables visibility across virtual and physical networks and provides operational views to manage and scale VMware NSX deployments.

VMware

Sample Customers

Citrix, Amdocs, Sysaid, Hexaware, Effibar, Revtrak, Taptica

NTTi3, VCIX-NV, VMware Networking and Security Business Unit, Illumio, CompuNet

Buyer's Guide

Loom Systems vs. vRealize Network Insight

July 2025

Free Report: Loom Systems vs. vRealize Network Insight

Find out what your peers are saying about Loom Systems vs. vRealize Network Insight and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Loom Systems vs. vRealize Network Insight report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.