Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

LogicHub SOAR+ [EOL] vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 12, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Torq
Sponsored
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (6th), AI-SOC (7th), AI-Powered Security Automation (2nd)
LogicHub SOAR+ [EOL]
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Palo Alto Networks Cortex X...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (3rd), SOC as a Service (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

Nimrod Vardi - PeerSpot reviewer
Global IT Director at OpenWeb
Automation workflows have transformed our IT, enabling secure just-in-time access control
We work with them quite often, so we have a direct line regarding areas in Torq that have room for improvement. If we have a feature request, we can request it. I do not have anything in mind at the moment. We were a design partner for a short while, so we feel that they listen and that users of the system have an impact on the way the system is designed for the better. They have a new community, which is something that I personally suggested years ago. There are many people like me in different places and they might have already built the workflow that I need. Having the option to share workflows or to jump on a thread and say I have this need, did anyone ever build a workflow for it, is amazing. Someone would jump in and say yes, sure, here, take this workflow. I think this is an amazing thing and I really hope that the community will come alive because I think this is really powerful. This is something that I already suggested and it did happen eventually, and I am quite happy with it. I do not have any specific feature in mind that I have a need for at the moment.
Reviewer32109 - PeerSpot reviewer
Contracting Automation Engineer at Craigslist
Integrated with hundreds of tools, analyzes data automatically, and has few false positives
The ability to analyze data automatically to make decisions automatically is what I like the most. It is also fully integrated with hundreds of other tools. Our SIEM has the search capability but it cannot save the dataset for me to merge with the result set of another query. In LogicHub, to join two resultant datasets is super easy because they use SQL operators that I can do left join, right join, inner join, or full cross join. Besides some reporting tools that I used in the past, no other SOAR can do this easily. We automated that whole analytic logic so I don’t need to repeat.
CC
Enterprise Security Architect V at FirstEnergy
Customization supports seamless workflow while data influx challenges response time
What I appreciate most about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is that it is very open, even more so than Anomali. I can create various custom automations and custom fields. There is significant customization ability in this platform. If I already have an established process, I do not have to change my process to fit into the tool. I can modify the tool to fit into my process, which makes things considerably easier. All of our alerts from different tools come into this central place as we have multiple SIEMs. We have items coming from Anomali and other platforms that are not SIEM tools. This serves as our central location where our SOC analysts can work and determine if incident response is needed. The platform provides data enrichment capabilities, offering information upfront so analysts do not have to search for it. They can access details such as username, phone number, email address, and workplace information. For malware files, they can retrieve details from VirusTotal, including file names and environment presence. We have built substantial automation around these features, which also helps us track case metrics, investigation time, and threat mitigation duration.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I appreciate most about Torq is that it is an essential part of our system."
"If I review about 100 vendors that I might work with, Torq is definitely in the top five that gave me personally investment back, just because every bit of effort I put into Torq eventually became a workflow that gave it back to me."
"Once I started to use the system and I saw the potential, it changed all of our work in IT."
"Using that one piece of AI, we auto-closed 511 cases in quarter four alone."
"As an analyst, it has demonstrated potential to reduce workforce requirements and time needed for related activities."
"This solution allows us to easily investigate malicious events, system alerts etc."
"It has improved my detection coverage in areas lacking by the SIEM."
"It is quite scalable. I would rate it a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable features are simplicity and ease of integration."
"Many different playbooks are available and can be customized."
"Cortex XSOAR's playbook for incident management and automation is highly valuable."
"This change is very useful for my SOC team as it reduces time and provides a fast response to the incident."
"The solution is easy to deploy."
"The Palo Alto ecosystem has a marketplace offering integration with Sentinel or other products."
"It is a scalable solution."
 

Cons

"Regarding stability, I have noticed some lagging, crashing, and downtime, which is one of my largest gripes."
"It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet."
"Even now, we have workflows that are in production that use AI steps and I get different results, making it unusable to some degree."
"The initial deployment of Torq was not easy."
"UI coloring can be improved."
"We would like this solution to have a higher level of support for SaaS applications."
"We need a little hands-on experience to install the solution."
"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR could improve the look, feel, and management of the cloud console. Additionally, the user could be more easily integrated."
"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR could improve the Panorama feature. We had to turn it off because it was not working properly."
"One of the significant issues we encounter is system slowdown when we receive an influx of alerts, which inhibits how quickly we can access the information needed for investigation."
"The formats are not compatible, are readily not available, and are not readable."
"The integration could be better. Cortex, for example, does not work with iPhone."
"The dashboard performance could be improved."
"For building automation, there is not a lot of good documentation. The documentation is there, but it is not very good from my perspective. There should be an improvement in this area. I don't see issues with anything else. In terms of new features, I have heard that other products have EBA functionality. It would be good if this functionality could be added."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
Information not available
"The price of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR could be reduced. We are always looking for a discount. There is an annual license needed to use this solution."
"The solution is based on an annual licensing model that is expensive."
"The solution is expensive."
"The solution's cost is high."
"The pricing is fair. The pricing reflects the value and feature set it offers."
"The solution is a bit on the expensive side."
"Palo Alto offers significant discounts to customers who purchase the products repeatedly."
"There is a perception that it is priced very high compared to other solutions."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
No data available
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise25
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Torq?
Regarding the downsides of Torq, one issue is that as a SaaS product, I sometimes encounter transparency issues about...
What is your primary use case for Torq?
My role is Cyber Security Engineer, and we use Torq for our case management platform, automating some of our phishing...
What advice do you have for others considering Torq?
Torq's maintenance requirements depend on how you define maintenance. While Torq handles the platform's overall relia...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
Comparing pricing to Micro Focus, they were offering bundles, making it free with their SIEM. For customers, it is ze...
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
To improve the solution, it needs to have complete features that are low-code, no-code, and should be plug-and-play. ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
No data available
Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
motorola, McAfee, RSA, Splunk>,Anomali
Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Splunk, Palo Alto Networks and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: January 2026.
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.