Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR comparison

Palo Alto Networks and Splunk are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2, while Splunk is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2. Palo Alto Networks holds a 9.0% mindshare in SOAR, compared to Splunk’s 8.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Splunk SOAR compete in the SOAR market category. Cortex XSOAR typically has the upper hand in automation and orchestration due to its extensive playbooks and integration capabilities, while Splunk SOAR is preferred for intuitive playbook creation and integration flexibility.

Features: Cortex XSOAR excels with its automation, vast repository of playbooks, and seamless integration with third-party systems. It offers robust playbooks and ease of customization. Splunk SOAR is noted for flexible integration capabilities, intuitive playbook creation, and multi-platform integration, aiding workflow facilitation.

Room for Improvement: Cortex XSOAR users face licensing complexities, high pricing, and limited on-premise options, calling for integration and UI improvements. Splunk SOAR has high costs, limitations in case management, and integration challenges, with users urging for better API documentation and comprehensive training materials.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cortex XSOAR deploys on public and on-premise clouds but receives mixed reviews for customer service, particularly in remote support. Splunk SOAR is seen as more responsive, with its deployment options spanning public and hybrid clouds, supported by a strong service framework. Both can improve in support response time and issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Cortex XSOAR is considered expensive, though many justify the ROI due to its comprehensive features and automation. Splunk SOAR also has a high cost, which may deter smaller organizations, but its value and efficiency are noted. Mature SOC processes are crucial for achieving optimal ROI with both platforms.

To learn more, read our detailed Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,410 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Torq

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Torq is 4.5%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is 9.0%, down from 11.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk SOAR is 8.0%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Splunk SOAR	8.0%
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR	9.0%
Torq	4.5%
Other	78.5%

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Q&A Highlights

it_user870255

Works at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Jun 15, 2018

Which Do You Recommend, Phantom or Demisto?

I would not recommend Phantom or Demisto, but rather JASK! JASK is modernizing security operations to reduce organizational risk and improve human efficiency through technology consolidation, enhanced AI and machine learning. We are empowering the SOC analyst to focus on investigative and response work, rather than the onerous data ingestion, normalization, parsing, and alert discrimination that is required to simply determine what is important. Purpose-built by the JASK team, proven in solving real-world SOC issues, the JASK Autonomous Security Operations Center (ASOC) Platform enhances threat detection and orchestration to improve contextual visibility, expose blind spots and initiate faster response times with advanced insights.

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Nimrod Vardi

Global IT Director at OpenWeb

Automation workflows have transformed our IT, enabling secure just-in-time access control

We work with them quite often, so we have a direct line regarding areas in Torq that have room for improvement. If we have a feature request, we can request it. I do not have anything in mind at the moment. We were a design partner for a short while, so we feel that they listen and that users of the system have an impact on the way the system is designed for the better. They have a new community, which is something that I personally suggested years ago. There are many people like me in different places and they might have already built the workflow that I need. Having the option to share workflows or to jump on a thread and say I have this need, did anyone ever build a workflow for it, is amazing. Someone would jump in and say yes, sure, here, take this workflow. I think this is an amazing thing and I really hope that the community will come alive because I think this is really powerful. This is something that I already suggested and it did happen eventually, and I am quite happy with it. I do not have any specific feature in mind that I have a need for at the moment.

Read full review

ChrisCollins

Enterprise Security Architect V at FirstEnergy

Customization supports seamless workflow while data influx challenges response time

What I appreciate most about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is that it is very open, even more so than Anomali. I can create various custom automations and custom fields. There is significant customization ability in this platform. If I already have an established process, I do not have to change my process to fit into the tool. I can modify the tool to fit into my process, which makes things considerably easier. All of our alerts from different tools come into this central place as we have multiple SIEMs. We have items coming from Anomali and other platforms that are not SIEM tools. This serves as our central location where our SOC analysts can work and determine if incident response is needed. The platform provides data enrichment capabilities, offering information upfront so analysts do not have to search for it. They can access details such as username, phone number, email address, and workplace information. For malware files, they can retrieve details from VirusTotal, including file names and environment presence. We have built substantial automation around these features, which also helps us track case metrics, investigation time, and threat mitigation duration.

Read full review

Shiboo Suren

Manager cybersecurity at Hexion Inc.

Automates threat response and reduces investigation time but needs better threat intelligence integration

One thing that we would like to see with Splunk SOAR is the expandability to the threat intelligence feed. Currently, we have limited ingestion to the threat intelligence feed for the correlation purpose. We would like to see it being integrated, with license cost or without license cost, to leading threat intelligence sources such as Recorded Future, Feedly, or Flare. That is something we would appreciate having integrated. The second thing on the improvement side is about exposed credential-related information. If we start ingesting those data to Splunk SOAR or SIEM with some sort of integration with threat intelligence feed, that will also improve our detection and prediction method or help us with the investigation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As an analyst, it has demonstrated potential to reduce workforce requirements and time needed for related activities."

"Once I started to use the system and I saw the potential, it changed all of our work in IT."

"Any request that comes in, regardless of how complex it is, I can accomplish it with Torq."

"What I appreciate most about Torq is that it is an essential part of our system."

"Using that one piece of AI, we auto-closed 511 cases in quarter four alone."

"If I review about 100 vendors that I might work with, Torq is definitely in the top five that gave me personally investment back, just because every bit of effort I put into Torq eventually became a workflow that gave it back to me."

"It was useful as a ticketing tool."

"The most valuable features are simplicity and ease of integration."

"The repository of playbooks and the integration between Palo Alto and IBM QRadar are some useful features"

"It’s easy to install."

"Many different playbooks are available and can be customized."

"It is quite scalable. I would rate it a ten out of ten."

"For organizations that are stable with their security operations, like those with around 50 members in their security team running full-phased operations 24/7, Cortex is necessary."

"The Palo Alto ecosystem has a marketplace offering integration with Sentinel or other products."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR pros

"The most valuable features of Splunk SOAR are the easy integration with other solutions, including other Splunk solutions. The most important playbooks we need on the market come already on the Frontend. However, nowadays, Splunk changed its name, it's not Frontend anymore, it's Splunk Store. This is a very strong point."

"So far, the interface is very easy to use."

"We are not a 24/7 SOC, so the most valuable feature of Splunk SOAR is the auto-response to threats when we are not in the office and the notifications that it sends to the on-call engineer."

"Our customers find it easy to conduct searches and consider it an excellent content management system."

"My understanding is the initial setup isn't too hard."

"Splunk has many features that make work easier, and it's simple to implement in a large production environment. Splunk collects a massive amount of data from cloud servers and handles it perfectly."

"It helps increase efficiency and productivity."

"When you design a playbook, you can integrate multiple log sources and define rules... After that, the platform automatically compiles all these activities and, based on the results, the analyst only has to indicate whether the result is a true or false positive. That reduces the time and effort involved."

More Splunk SOAR pros

Cons

"Regarding the pricing of Torq, I would say it is expensive."

"Even now, we have workflows that are in production that use AI steps and I get different results, making it unusable to some degree."

"It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet."

"Regarding stability, I have noticed some lagging, crashing, and downtime, which is one of my largest gripes."

"The initial deployment of Torq was not easy."

"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR lacks to offer SIEM functionalities currently."

"We need a little hands-on experience to install the solution."

"XSOAR could have more integration options."

"The price of the solution could be lower."

"There is room for improvement in support. The response time could be faster."

"I think they should increase their collaboration base."

"The solution's correlation rules and playbooks should be improved."

"It is been decommissioned by Palo Alto."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR cons

"Splunk's support for integration is subpar and has room for improvement."

"I haven't used it fully, but based on my usage, I could not find simulation tools and features. It currently lacks simulation features, which are important for me for creating a playbook. It is also very expensive for my region."

"I haven't had any issues with the solution so far."

"The dashboard could be improved and some other features. SOAR should integrate network capabilities, allowing us to also monitor the WLAN network. Splunk is also expensive and difficult for beginners to learn. It's hard for a new user to figure out how to visualize old threat data. It took two to three months to learn with hands-on experience how to use the dashboard, visualize events, and analyze threats."

"Portability is one thing that is currently lacking. The open-source product that I evaluated had portability. It would require a lot of development effort, but it will save the cost of rewriting all the playbooks."

"It could be easier to implement."

"I'm not an expert on Splunk SOAR, but I'm sure our team members know what areas could be improved."

"I'd rate Splunk's technical support around five because compared to IBM QRadar, their support is much better. I feel Splunk should enhance their support, as it appears lacking, especially considering the costs associated with higher licenses."

More Splunk SOAR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There is a yearly license required for this solution and it is expensive."

"The price of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is expensive."

"The solution is based on an annual licensing model that is expensive."

"My company did not make any payments towards the licensing costs attached to the product since we were only using its pilot version."

"The price of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is comparable to other solutions in the market."

"The solution's pricing needs improvement."

"The pricing is fair. The pricing reflects the value and feature set it offers."

"The solution is a bit on the expensive side."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR pricing and cost advice

"Splunk SOAR is more expensive compared to other options for SOAR."

"It's very overpriced because it is based on the number of users. There is no bulk licensing."

"When we first purchased our Splunk SOAR license, it was based on an event-count model. It was based on the number of events. I had strong opinions at the time that automation should not be stifled by the amount of automation you can accomplish, so the previous structure was not as beneficial for us. Later that year, we got told or saw at a conference that they announced user-based pricing. We are now in a renewal period, so we migrated to a user-based license model, which is more appropriate for us so that we no longer have to worry about stifling our automation based on the quantity."

"Splunk is a fast enterprise tool, but it costs too much. At the same time, it's worth what we pay, in my opinion. We can efficiently perform all the functions and tie together the data. It's the perfect tool for our needs."

"The cost is high and the licensing is on an annual basis."

"Splunk SOAR is moderately priced, neither cheap nor overly expensive."

"Splunk SOAR is an expensive solution for an organization of our size."

"I don't know the exact price, but for my region, it is very expensive."

More Splunk SOAR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,410 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Answers from the Community

it_user870255

Works at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Jun 15, 2018

Which Do You Recommend, Phantom or Demisto?

See 2 answers

Claudia Lorat

Consultant

May 23, 2018

Read full answer

it_user889167

Director Of Business Development at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Jun 15, 2018

I would recommend CyberSponse. There is a reason why CyberSponse have been awarded Government and Military contracts over all the competition! Commerical customers need the same power and capability, why settle for anything less!

Read full answer

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	25

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	33

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Torq?

We do not utilize the AI features that much. When it comes to general AI features of Torq, we are just slowly startin...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Torq?

Torq markets itself as a security tool, and we do use them for security, but not in the traditional sense they market...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Torq?

I would rate Torq an eight overall. I feel that Torq is as good as the effort you put into it. The limitations are ve...

See all answers

What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?

The product can automate security tasks.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?

Comparing pricing to Micro Focus, they were offering bundles, making it free with their SIEM. For customers, it is ze...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?

I think Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR can be improved as it has a little bit higher cost than any other SOAR. I thi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Splunk Phantom?

Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?

I am familiar with the pricing aspect, setup cost, and licensing cost of Splunk SOAR, and it is pretty much similar t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?

There are areas for improvement in Splunk SOAR, such as the need for more code-level customizations despite providing...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tines vs Torq

Compared 44% of the time

Blink Ops vs Torq

Compared 12% of the time

Swimlane vs Torq

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Torq

Compared 3% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Torq

Compared 3% of the time

More Torq Competitors

Cortex XSIAM vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Compared 24% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Compared 7% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Resilient vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Compared 3% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Competitors

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 12% of the time

Tines vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 7% of the time

Google Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 5% of the time

More Splunk SOAR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Torq

January 2026

Download Torq product report

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

January 2026

Download Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk SOAR

January 2026

Download Splunk SOAR product report

Also Known As

No data available

Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto

Phantom

Overview

Torq is the enterprise AI SOC solution that effectively combines adaptive insights and automation to handle critical threats efficiently. It manages threat lifecycles, swiftly moving from triage to response, ensuring effective risk management.

Torq is designed to streamline security operations by aggregating telemetry across your security stack. It investigates significant risks and manages threats from triage to containment and remediation. This AI-driven tool enhances the capabilities of your SecOps team, allowing them to achieve more impactful results without introducing complicated processes.

What are the key features of Torq?

Adaptive Agentic Insights: Provides real-time threat intelligence tailored to specific security challenges.
Automation: Automates responses to security incidents, minimizing manual intervention requirements.
Threat Lifecycle Management: Comprehensive handling of threats from detection to remediation.
Telemetry Aggregation: Integrates data across platforms for a unified security overview.

Why consider Torq based on reviews?

Efficiency: Users notice significant reductions in time spent managing threats.
Risk Reduction: Enhanced ability to identify and address critical threats promptly.
Resource Optimization: Allows teams to allocate effort to other critical tasks by reducing manual security operations.
Scalability: Adaptable to meet the demands of growing or changing infrastructures.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Torq shows effectiveness by adapting to specific risk scenarios often encountered in these fields. Its integration with existing infrastructures makes it a valuable asset for maintaining stringent security standards, essential for protecting critical data and operations in diverse high-stakes environments.

Torq

Palo Alto Networks delivers a complete solution that helps Tier-1 through Tier-3 analysts and SOC managers to optimize the entire incident life cycle while auto documenting and journaling all the evidence. More than 100+ integrations enable security orchestration workflows for incident management and other critical security operation tasks.

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is a piece of Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response software that redefines what it means for a program to orchestrate security in an automated manner. It is a next-generation solution that offers all of the features of dozens of siloed security operations center tools in one place. Cortex XSOAR combines case management, automation, real-time collaboration, and threat intelligence management to create a platform that can handle all aspects of system security. Teams that make use of Cortex XSOAR can expect to cut the number of issues that they will have to deal with by 75%. At the same time, the speed at which they resolve those issues that slip through will rise by 90%.

Cortex XSOAR ensures that all of the IT and security tools that you employ function as a unified system. It does this by employing hundreds of integrations that allow you to run a wide variety of programs at once without ever worrying about them interfering with each other. These integrations are limited only by your imagination. They can be used immediately as they are, if that is what you need. However, they can also be customized according to the requirements of your system. This approach provides you with the maximum levels of both flexibility and utility.

The model that this platform uses is based on a machine learning algorithm. The level of automation allows you to provide more than an unchanging and inflexible blanket of coverage. Cortex XSOAR takes all of the data that it gathers and uses it to expand its protective capabilities. This creates recommendations that you can use to create a threat playbook that can be deployed uniformly throughout your organization.

Benefits of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Some of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR’s benefits include:

The ability to have all of your data collected in a single location. Valuable time can be saved now that everything that security analysts need to know in order to diagnose and react to threats has been centralized.
Security operations center tasks can be automated. This allows you to assign management and analyst staff to the most essential tasks. The effectiveness of your organization will be increased, which will result in a rise in your company’s overall security and productivity.
Many kinds of data can be stitched together by this platform. Network, endpoint, cloud, and identity data can be combined to offer a more complete picture of the threats that are discovered.
Integrated threat intelligence management can notify you about threats in real time. Now you can diagnose and address issues as they arise. You can also assign values to the threats so that your resources are being used in the most effective manner possible.

Reviews from Real Users

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR’s centralized monitoring interface and automation are two features that help it stand out. This might help explain why one quarter of the Fortune 500 companies choose Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR over the competition.

Peerspot users note the effectiveness of these features. One user wrote, “We were looking for a single pane of glass type of solution that would allow us to physically be in one appliance - be able to work in concert with other servers that we have within our environment. We wanted orchestration and automation. The single pane of glass was the most important part.” Another noted, "The automation part and the playbook creation part are awesome. The way it is responding to the customers and incidents is also very good. In the SOC environment, I guess it will carry out around 50% of the work."

Palo Alto Networks

Splunk SOAR offers features like automation and orchestration of manual tasks, speeding up work, detection and response to advanced and emerging threats.

Go from overwhelmed to in-control

Automate manual tasks. Address every alert, every day. Establish repeatable procedures that allow security analysts to stop being reactive and focus on mission-critical objectives to protect your business.

Force multiply your team

Orchestrate and automate repetitive tasks, investigation and response to increase efficiency and productivity, and do more with the people you already have. Make a team of three feel like a team of 10.

From 30 minutes to 30 seconds

Work faster with Splunk SOAR. Respond to threats in seconds. Lower your mean time to respond (MTTR) by automating security tasks and workflows across all of your security tools.

End-to-end security operations made easy

Take advantage of Splunk Enterprise Security and Splunk SOAR joining forces to provide a seamless and intuitive SecOps platform to prevent, detect and respond to advanced and emerging threats.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity

Recorded Future, Blackstone

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR

February 2026

Free Report: Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,410 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.