Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs Malwarebytes Teams comparison

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Malwarebytes Teams

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

29th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Malwarebytes Teams

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Malwarebytes Teams is 2.2%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Malwarebytes Teams	2.2%
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum	0.9%
Other	96.9%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Nadeem Syed

CEO at Haniya Technologies

Continuous protection has improved automated threat response and reporting for our endpoints

We did work with one of our clients who required mobile security solutions. In my opinion, Trend Micro, when we went through the POCs and other components, we did not find it very strong as far as mobile security is concerned. I think Kaspersky is much better than Trend Micro when it comes to mobile security solutions. From an outside perspective, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum looks pretty strong and comprehensive. The main improvement would be if they could decrease the cost, as it would be great for clients since it is quite expensive now compared to when it used to be cheaper. The key competitor for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is Trend Micro. Trend Micro is the only competitor in the market right now. I would say both Trend Micro Endpoint Detection and Response and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum are quite similar; I cannot say that one is better than the other. The difference is mainly in cost; Trend Micro has mostly moved all their products to the cloud, offering no on-premises products now, whereas Kaspersky is still in a transition phase providing both on-premises and cloud solutions. Many clients prefer on-premises as it is less expensive compared to cloud.

Read full review

Davina Becker

Senior Content Strategist at PeerSpot

Provides protection against malware but needs improved billing transparency

I can only speak to it on a personal level. If someone is considering it, they should test it on their own systems. I can't personally recommend it because each person has their own needs. While it may work for me as a malware antivirus solution, I can't recommend it to someone else who may have a different system or use case. I rate the overall solution 7.5 out of 10. Malwarebytes protects me against malware. If they fix the pricing model so it's not automatically charging me, the rating could improve. Until then, I can't give it an 8.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"EDR Optimum's best features are its dashboard, control of external media, and user-friendliness."

"The initial setup was easy."

"One of the most valuable features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is its cloud console allows users to remotely isolate a single computer from a network in the event of an attack, enabling them to perform root cause analysis without disrupting the entire network. This is particularly useful for organizations that may not have expert resources for endpoint detection and response."

"The most beneficial aspect of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is its protection capabilities, followed by its device management capabilities. The ability to remotely install software is highly advantageous, making it a convenient and helpful feature."

"They provide integrated protections and prevention with multi-layered anti-malware, which makes clients want to go for it."

"The network discovery tools they have make deployment easier, and even without an Active Directory or an RMM tool, you can still deploy Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum quite easily compared to other solutions."

"The most advantageous aspect is tracking and taking action automatically."

"It fulfills security and protection requirements against newly discovered malware, especially ransomware attacks."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum pros

"It's very versatile and thorough."

"It gets the job done, and they are consistently updating it monthly."

"The dashboard actually is good and it is simple."

"The most valuable features of the solution are malware scanning and malware removal."

"Being able to carry out a full scan on your system."

"The platform is straightforward to install."

"The solution is very good at scanning."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to customize for different groups."

More Malwarebytes Teams pros

Cons

"Support is an area for improvement. It should have faster response times."

"What I want to be added to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is a single pane of glass management, where everything is integrated into a single pane of glass."

"An area for improvement in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum would be to provide the cloud console platform to all users, regardless of the number of licenses a company has purchased. For example, a company with 50 employees should have access to the cloud console platform even if they have only purchased a certain number of licenses for the solution."

"The central management needs improvement. The ease of use for updating and managing through the web console is difficult and lacks features."

"The support of Kaspersky rates a five out of ten. The response time is not very fast, and many times the answers are not very precise."

"The technology grows day by day, so we need to check for updates and do the updates daily. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is still improving over time and quality-wise, there are still things that need to be changed in the product, so that's why I rated it nine out of ten. Compatibility could also be improved in the product."

"The solution needs to give more control to users on firewalls."

"Occasionally, I encounter connection problems, and the signal is not very good."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum cons

"The reporting is not as flexible as you would find with other antivirus software."

"The interface could be improved. Currently, you need to really dig around to find the elements you need."

"We have noticed that when the solution is doing the scanning, all the scanning activities make the device heavier. It slows down your machine."

"It would be better if updates could be downloaded, and deployed, on-premises to avoid low bandwidth causing issues."

"I really hate the automatic rebuilding without even asking. It's just an annoyance that they should at least ask me, like a month before they bill me."

"The product's stability needs improvement."

"My clients have frequently encountered some tech support scams where when you go to a particular website, it throws up a fake warning to you and states that you need to call this number."

"We experience a lot of false positives."

More Malwarebytes Teams cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is affordability, even for companies with limited budgets, such as those in the Pakistani market. It is a subscription-based license."

"The solution could be made a bit cheaper."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is more affordable than the endpoint security product of Fortinet. Whether it's worth the money depends on your security strategy."

"The tool’s pricing is yearly. The solution’s pricing is expensive."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. You need to pay about 80,000 rupees yearly for the tool. There are no additional costs associated with the product."

"The price is good, not too high."

"The pricing is totally reasonable."

"Kaspersky gives a consolidated price with a good solution. If we choose something else, we need to add other options on our own."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum pricing and cost advice

"Yearly, it is around $50 per client."

"The price of Malwarebytes is in the middle range compared to other vendors."

"I believe the retail price is between $40 and $50 per copy."

"The licensing is per seat, with clients being a little less expensive than servers. If we need more licenses, we can accomplish that within a day. As Malwarebytes adds new features to their product, such as DNS filtering and a patching module, they want to charge us more even though we're a premium user, which isn't ideal."

"We expect to pay $1,000 USD a month, depending on the number of users."

"Malwarebytes is a cost-effective product."

"It is really expensive. We've got between 30 and 40 licenses every year, and for the number of licenses that we have, we're finding that Malwarebytes on average costs between $900 and $1,000 more per year than comparable options. We're paying about $3,300 per year for these licenses. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

More Malwarebytes Teams pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is reasonably priced for the market. I do not know the exact cost of the license per endpoint or annually.

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?

The reporting system is good, but it can be quite tricky for customers to get the reports. Unfortunately, Kaspersky UI is something they need to work upon. It's not as simplistic or user-friendly a...

What is your primary use case for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?

The main use case is attractive for customers because the endpoint detection and response system helps with patch management and remote software. It has many ITSM feature sets, which has been an at...

What do you like most about Malwarebytes?

Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

I really hate the automatic rebilling without officially confirming it with me. It's an annoyance and they should at least confirm with me, like a month before they bill me.

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

It takes up too much space when it's trying to run in the background.

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Comparisons

Compared 11% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Compared 10% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security Complete vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Compared 9% of the time

Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Compared 7% of the time

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 14% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 8% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

More Malwarebytes Teams Competitors

Product Reports

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum product report

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum report

Malwarebytes Teams

Download Malwarebytes Teams product report

Overview

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Optimum delivers straightforward defense-in-depth against complex and advanced threats with no additional overheads. Use automated and 'single-click' responses so you can ensure every last piece of the threat is rooted out of your system.

Kaspersky

Malwarebytes Teams provides advanced threat protection and efficient detection and removal capabilities, featuring cloud-based management and robust endpoint security. It operates on Windows and Mac, emphasizing threat interception and the cloud-management interface.

Offering comprehensive protection, Malwarebytes Teams is recognized for its customizable and user-friendly interface. The anti-exploit feature effectively intercepts threats in Office applications, while frequent updates maintain security standards. Efficient scanning, threat response, and rollback features are highly valued, as is its ability to integrate seamlessly into diverse environments. Remote accessibility and cloud management enhance its robust endpoint protection.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes Teams?

Comprehensive Threat Protection: Advanced detection and removal for malware.
Cloud-Based Management: Manage security conveniently from the cloud.
Anti-Exploit Feature: Protects against threats in Office applications.
Efficient Scanning: Quick and effective threat detection.
Threat Response and Rollback: Swift response with rollback capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Security: Continuous updates and strong endpoint protection.
Integration Flexibility: Works well with existing environments.
Reporting Capabilities: Offers effective reporting and monitoring.
Remote Accessibility: Manage security from any location.

Malwarebytes Teams is widely implemented in cybersecurity across industries for endpoint security. Organizations deploy it for malware detection, intrusion protection, and compliance scanning, relying on its antivirus capabilities and ransomware rollback. It serves as a secondary tool alongside primary systems to enhance security on both Windows and Mac environments, particularly valued for monitoring usage behaviors without controlling endpoints.

Malwarebytes

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Knutson Construction

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Malwarebytes Teams