We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for MDM and Jamf Pro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Conditional access has helped us tailor and enforce our security policies in the mobile space."
"The performance of Microsoft Intune is good."
"The ability to send configurations to our systems is valuable, particularly as we don't have a regular Windows AD server. Our current environment doesn't have a Windows AD, which limits our ability to push GPOs. However, this is where the solution can step in and help us push policies."
"It is quite policy-enabled, so you can build pretty much any policy to manage remote endpoints."
"Being able to manage the devices remotely is most valuable. We can push security requirements through Microsoft Intune."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Intune is having all our devices compliant with our policies."
"...Intune itself integrates with that entire Microsoft ecosystem. As an individual product itself, it's okay. It holds up. But when you start saying "I've bought this as part of a wider solution, as a company we are going Microsoft throughout," then it makes more sense to have Microsoft Intune... so you have that single dashboard."
"We have one MDM that works with Windows, iOS, and Android."
"It's effective in what it is able to achieve and it's easy to use."
"The company provides great customer service."
"The user interface is user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature is that everything is in one place, which makes it easy to manage."
"The most valuable features of MobileIron UEM are tunneling and enterprise integration."
"We found the initial setup to be simple."
"With the countless API integrations and Jamf Marketplace add-ons, Jamf is customizable and is a total device management tool for Apple's ecosystem."
"It's as easy as procuring the licensing for the apps and then setting it to the volume purchasing back in Jamf."
"The Smart Groups have been very beneficial for quick reporting when a critical, out of cycle patch is required."
"Jamf has made it achievable for us to easily deploy & manage Apple devices anywhere in the world, without the need for hands-on assistance from IT staff."
"From the reviews that we are getting, the feedback from the client, the tool is very good on the Jamf side - especially for the Macs."
"I am most excited about a feature that is called User-Initialed Enrollment."
"The self-service portal to share scripts and other tasks that have extremely minimized the need for calls to our support teams, or even sharing the applications we package and allowing users to pick and choose what apps they need or want, instead of just blanket installing everything from our old environment."
"Intune's third-party patch management could be better. It should be easier for the average system admin to keep non-Microsoft applications updated."
"Onboarding of endpoint devices is not straightforward. The onboarding process was a little heavier than I thought it would be. That's the key improvement area. Obviously, the more control you have over the devices, the better it is."
"Microsoft Intune lags market leaders, such as Apperian, in its MAM capabilities."
"I think that there is room for improvement with the reporting. If this is done, it will be a better product."
"Reporting could be improved. It needs to be more expensive and robust."
"The pricing can be expensive if you are not combining it with other products."
"The policies we had in SCCM and AD offered features that are missing from Microsoft Intune."
"It would really be helpful to have the option to manage server operating systems as well, like Windows Server, at least. That way, we could scrap the use of SCCM, which requires a lot of on-premises infrastructure."
"MobileIron UEM could improve the monitoring of devices."
"We would like the initial setup to be simpler."
"UI needs an upgrade, feels very outdated."
"The interface is complicated and not very easy to use."
"The integration between the MobileIron and Advanced Neurons isn't completely in sync, and we're still working on that."
"This solution would benefit from more focus on Self Service, such as Office 365 and GSuite integration."
"There is room for improvement with Jamf Pro, especially regarding updates."
"We had some issues with its integration with other products, such as Intune. There were some issues with the way you have to register your device into Intune."
"Patch Management needs work to be efficient."
"The solution only makes sense if you have a lot of macOS products in your company."
"Jamf Pro currently is only used on Mac computers and could improve by having compatibility with other operating systems. We have to use other tools to manage our Windows and Android devices. There could be other improvements but I am still exploring and learning more about the features."
"I can only say that I would love to see a more customizable dashboard."
"The patch management needs improvement in Jamf Pro."
Ivanti Neurons for MDM is ranked 5th in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 5 reviews while Jamf Pro is ranked 1st in Mobile Device Management (MDM) with 103 reviews. Ivanti Neurons for MDM is rated 7.4, while Jamf Pro is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for MDM writes "Feature-rich, easy to use, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jamf Pro writes "Customizable with a self-service portal and a good security posture". Ivanti Neurons for MDM is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Ivanti Avalanche, IBM MaaS360, ManageEngine Endpoint Central and Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management, whereas Jamf Pro is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, SOTI MobiControl, Microsoft Configuration Manager and Sophos Mobile. See our Ivanti Neurons for MDM vs. Jamf Pro report.
We monitor all UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.