OpenText Operations Orchestration and IBM Robotic Process Automation are competing solutions in the automation category. IBM RPA appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced analytics and cognitive capabilities, providing superior automation features according to user reviews.
Features: OpenText Operations Orchestration offers extensive integration options, scalability, and reliability, making it compatible with various IT ecosystems. In contrast, IBM RPA excels in cognitive automation and robust analytics, enabling precise optimization of complex processes and intelligent decision-making features that enhance operational efficiency.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its cognitive capabilities and analytical features to match those of IBM RPA. Additionally, improving user interface intuitiveness and expanding AI-driven functionalities could be beneficial. IBM RPA could benefit from streamlining its deployment process, reducing complexity, and improving initial setup times. Enhancements in its integration process with non-IBM systems may also be advantageous.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Operations Orchestration is notable for its rapid deployment, straightforward setup, and responsive customer support. IBM RPA offers a more elaborate deployment model with extensive customization options, supported by detailed assistance and technical support that is highly valued by users.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Operations Orchestration is cost-effective with a lower initial setup cost, providing substantial ROI through effective process management. IBM RPA requires a higher initial investment but offers significant long-term value through enhanced efficiency and productivity, promising a faster ROI despite the higher price point.
Fortra's Automate has effectively replaced the workload of an entire employee, saving us significant time and money.
They don't always understand the processes I'm trying to implement.
They are very responsive and have been able to resolve any issues I have encountered.
I would rate the technical support as a nine out of ten because it is quite fast and courteous.
It is easy to increase one bot or one studio without needing to buy another orchestrator, which can be quite expensive.
I would rate the scalability of IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) as eight on a scale of one to ten.
The stability of Fortra's Automate is excellent.
It has very robust features, and it is not prone to instability.
IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) has been running smoothly for four years without any errors, which indicates a high level of stability.
Integration with Amazon S3 is somewhat lacking.
I would prefer not having to log in to update a ticket; being able to respond via email would be beneficial.
I find that most important features are strong, however, there is a lack of good development for artificial intelligence, such as machine learning.
Competitors are often more expensive than Automate.
It offered what we wanted at a good, competitive price.
It does a lot but also costs a lot.
The pricing of IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is an area that could be improved.
Automate's non-reliance on additional orchestrators makes it quite cost-effective.
The most valuable features of Fortra's Automate include its FTP functionality and file manipulation capabilities.
I really like the API functionality; it's a slick aspect of the solution when I'm using it.
We haven't encountered any errors in the last four years, which speaks to its reliability.
Automate offers a user-friendly solution with a drag-and-drop interface for efficient task automation and integration with major platforms like SAP and Azure, making it ideal for quick deployment with minimal coding and training.
Automate provides powerful features for businesses seeking efficient automation, offering compatibility with databases, email integration, and cloud platforms. Its simple interface supports both beginners and experienced users, simplifying tasks like invoice processing, HR automation, and data transformation. Cost-effective pricing and flexible licensing enhance its appeal while integration capabilities and scheduling tools ensure smooth workflow automation.
What are Automate's Key Features?In industries such as healthcare, banking, and logistics, Automate is used for tasks like invoice payment automation, data transformation, and task automation. This leads to streamlined processes and reduced manual workload, illustrating its value in enhancing operational efficiency through diversified workflows.
IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is a technology that encompasses the use of smart robots in any process requiring efficiency, consistency and speed, with no risk of mistakes. In a nutshell, RPA simulates a human user working.
Today, it is possible to automate processes through the use of digital robots, or bots, which execute pre-programed, repetitive tasks in a safe and mistake free manner. There are literally thousands of opportunities for Robotic Process Automation to make an impact on your organization today, including: automatic invoice emission, system integration, information reconciliation, report generation, intelligent email management to lead generation, and many others.
OpenText Operations Orchestration (OO) automates, integrates, and orchestrates any IT process, on cloud or off. Automate using low-code/no-code workflow authoring options. Integrate with an API rich, extensible platform. Centrally orchestrate powerful, scalable workflows.
With OO you can automate and orchestrate infrastructure automation and IT processes from service fulfillment to incident remediation, cloud service delivery, and disaster recovery.
Operations Orchestration offers the tools needed to provide enterprise wide orchestration capabilities:
Operations Orchestration offers the following components:
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
