

Hyland OnBase and SS&C Blue Prism compete in the enterprise content management and automation landscape. Hyland OnBase seems to have the upper hand in customer support and pricing, while SS&C Blue Prism offers valuable automation features justifying its cost for scaling businesses.
Features: Hyland OnBase offers document management, integration capabilities, and content services. It provides data security and integrates well with applications like Salesforce. The solution is flexible and adaptable to various business processes. SS&C Blue Prism is valued for its AI and automation features. It enables workflow creation with conditions for processes, and its intuitive user interface aids in use and adoption. The platform offers automation to save time and improve efficiency in operations.
Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase could enhance its keyword management to prevent performance issues and expand its advanced capture capabilities. The solution's interface might be made more customizable for user-specific needs. Pricing transparency can be another area for enhancement. SS&C Blue Prism could streamline its deployment complexity and offer more language capabilities for non-English integrations. Simplifying its email automation features could make the system more user-friendly. Additionally, improving its error handling and reporting would aid usability.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase offers straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, suitable for companies with limited IT resources. Its stable platform ensures seamless integration across different environments. SS&C Blue Prism requires more technical expertise due to its complex deployment model but provides solid customer support for users. Its technical resources are aimed at easing the setup for automation initiatives.
Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase generally has a lower initial setup cost, making it attractive for cost-sensitive organizations with quicker ROI prospects. SS&C Blue Prism, while having higher initial costs, offers significant long-term ROI through automation benefits. It saves costs by optimizing operations and reducing manual input over time, while OnBase immediately impacts cost-effectiveness.
I have seen a return on investment with Hyland OnBase because it provides a very reliable ECM platform for my organization, helps to remove the dependency on paper files and file folders, saves real estate costs, and facilitates the ability to work from anywhere.
It saved a lot of money, with 50 to 60% of our cost saved, especially through automation.
I have more time to work on meaningful tasks since automation has been very helpful in automating repetitive and time-consuming tasks.
Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.
I find technical support from Hyland to be good.
Our team manages security and compliance by storing data for five years, archiving logs older than seven days while maintaining backups, and implementing strict logging practices.
They provide very detailed responses that enable us to handle any issues effectively.
The response times were slow to turn around.
Transitioning to cloud-based services may reduce these costs in the future.
It is scalable from the solution perspective.
Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.
I found it to be high on stability, and I would rate it at nine.
The solution is generally stable, though we have faced issues with increased transaction loads causing latency and occasional hang-ups.
The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.
I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial.
If AI could be used more at an enterprise level, since we are purchasing at an enterprise level for the subscription of Hyland OnBase, I would say if those AI informations would stay within the enterprise and not go outside of our enterprise boundaries, it would be secure and maintain our privacy.
It was not developed in a consumption-based manner, however, rather in a fixed-price licensing model that did not account for volumes.
I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.
We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.
The pricing model was not modern, as it wasn't designed on a consumption basis or as a service basis.
The licensing cost can be a bit expensive compared to its competitors.
Overall, my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that for large organizations and medium organizations, it is very cost-effective.
Hyland OnBase has impacted my organization positively by faster document retrieval, intuitive setup, reduced manual processing, and comes with security.
The impact of Hyland OnBase on our organization is that automating manual processes has had an incredible effect on our return on investment, and the man-hours saved by automating processes pays for the system, ranging from one to five hours.
It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.
The control room feature, which allows me to run and monitor the automation, is to be the most useful.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| SS&C Blue Prism | 1.4% |
| Hyland OnBase | 1.1% |
| Other | 97.5% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.
SS&C Blue Prism, renowned for its language capabilities and workflow design, supports detailed automation building, enhancing productivity. Despite some challenges like cost and limited integration, it offers substantial potential in automating diverse processes.
SS&C Blue Prism offers strong capabilities in document reading and a straightforward workflow design, making it accessible with basic BPM knowledge. Detailed automation design in the studio and effective monitoring in the control room are notable features. While facing higher costs and a steeper learning curve, it supports process mining and generative AI initiatives, crucial for industries aiming at transformation and activation services. Limited external system integration and lack of agile delivery encourage a strategic approach in its deployment.
What are the key features?
What ROI should users expect?
SS&C Blue Prism finds its application across industries. In service industries, it automates repetitive tasks while supporting migration projects. Within the insurance sector, it helps automate claims handling and pricing by integrating data efficiently. Companies use it when transitioning processes, such as upgrading systems from older versions to new applications.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.