Camunda vs SS&C Blue Prism comparison

Camunda and SS&C Technologies are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Camunda is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4, while SS&C Technologies is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.7. Camunda holds a 11.3% mindshare in BPD, compared to SS&C Technologies’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of SS&C Technologies users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 78 Camunda reviews

21,608 Views
6,050 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

SS&C Blue Prism

Read 5 SS&C Blue Prism reviews

1,062 Views
202 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Camunda

SS&C Blue Prism

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Camunda and SS&C Blue Prism are automation solutions competing in process automation and robotic process automation, respectively. While both have strong offerings, SS&C Blue Prism is seen as superior due to its advanced features, which justify the higher cost.

Features: Camunda provides a flexible platform emphasizing process automation, easy system integration, and open-source capabilities. The open-source nature reduces dependency on proprietary software. SS&C Blue Prism offers advanced robotic process automation with robust scalability, strong governance, and comprehensive automation tools. These tools are designed for enterprise-grade automation needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda supports multiple deployment options, including cloud and on-premise, with extensive documentation and responsive support enhancing user experience. It provides quick and adaptable deployments suitable for various business environments. While SS&C Blue Prism also offers flexible deployment, it is recognized for a detailed implementation process. Their dedicated account management offers personalized customer service, contributing to stable long-term usage.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda's open-source model reduces upfront costs significantly, offering rapid ROI due to minimal licensing fees. This model appeals to businesses seeking cost-effective automation solutions. In contrast, SS&C Blue Prism involves higher initial costs but guarantees substantial ROI through its sophisticated automation capabilities. This appeals to enterprises willing to invest in advanced, long-term automation benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. SS&C Blue Prism Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. SS&C Blue Prism

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Design

2nd

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Ranking in Process Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SS&C Blue Prism

Ranking in Business Process Design

20th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

31st

Ranking in Process Automation

28th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Medical Insurance Claims Software (3rd), Insurance Claims Processing (3rd), Document Management Software (12th), Low-Code Development Platforms (23rd), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (15th), Loan Management Software (3rd), Document Automation Software (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Camunda is 11.3%, up from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SS&C Blue Prism is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	11.3%
SS&C Blue Prism	0.6%
Other	88.1%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years

I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.

Read full review

VikasKumar16

Technical Auditor at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has defined complex workflows and handled detailed automation scenarios efficiently

It requires extensive knowledge if somebody wants to work on SS&C Blue Prism, compared to other tools. The downside is you need to be very aware of the tool. You need to know how to write the workflow and have a detailed understanding of SS&C Blue Prism. It takes more time to learn compared to other tools in the market which are more user-friendly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."

"We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features."

"It is a scalable product. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten."

"It has an open BPM"

"Camunda's support for BPMN 2.0 is a great advantage because it allows us to have a common language to discuss technology and business in the same perspective."

"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."

"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."

"We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation."

More Camunda pros

"We have a lot of customer requests on a daily basis for different use cases, and we have different processes for that."

"The key feature of SS&C that I find valuable is the general workflow visibility."

"Some important features include the language capabilities, which are crucial since RPA has to read the documents provided by the customer."

"I find the design studio, where I can build the automation, and the control room feature, which allows me to run and monitor the automation, to be the most useful."

Cons

"Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI."

"The deployment model could be improved for easier implementation. More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup."

"The primary issue regarding the Camuto platform is its high cost of training. This is why I haven't discussed it extensively, as compared to other products that are more affordable in terms of developer training."

"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."

"We have faced problems with the performance."

"Lacking in forms visualization."

"They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome."

"I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself."

More Camunda cons

"I noticed that it lacks the ability to automatically record the process steps like some of its competitors."

"Blue Prism is more costly than UiPath in terms of robotic licenses and orchestrators."

"There is a need for improved integration with external systems in SS&C."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We're using the free version. We used the Enterprise version for some time. If I compare free versus what we paid at that time, the Enterprise version costs a lot. For the additional functionality that we got with the Enterprise version, it was too costly."

"Compared to other software, Camunda Platform is quite cost-effective."

"I tried to get some information about buying the license for the solution, but I found it kind of hard to understand the business model."

"I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."

"Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."

"The evaluation of my customers on pricing is that it is reasonable."

"Camunda has a free service as well as a commercial service. We are using the free service."

"Camunda is a cheaply priced product, making it one of its major USPs."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Retailer

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SS&C Blue Prism?

The pricing was not particularly competitive. It wasn't flexible for different geographies. For instance, in Africa, they didn't have a different pricing model to account for affordability. The pri...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SS&C Blue Prism?

It requires extensive knowledge if somebody wants to work on SS&C Blue Prism, compared to other tools. The downside is you need to be very aware of the tool. You need to know how to write the w...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SS&C Blue Prism?

SS&C Blue Prism is used for all automation cases and process automation. For example, in claims handling and pricing processes in the insurance company, we have automated the process for extrac...

See all answers

Comparisons

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Alfresco vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 34% of the time

FIS Commercial Lending Suite vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 14% of the time

BIC Platform vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 8% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 8% of the time

More SS&C Blue Prism Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

October 2025

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

October 2025

Download SS&C Blue Prism product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

SS&C AWD

Interactive Demo

Camunda

Demo not available

SS&C Technologies

Overview

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Camunda

SS&C Blue Prism, renowned for its language capabilities and workflow design, supports detailed automation building, enhancing productivity. Despite some challenges like cost and limited integration, it offers substantial potential in automating diverse processes.

SS&C Blue Prism offers strong capabilities in document reading and a straightforward workflow design, making it accessible with basic BPM knowledge. Detailed automation design in the studio and effective monitoring in the control room are notable features. While facing higher costs and a steeper learning curve, it supports process mining and generative AI initiatives, crucial for industries aiming at transformation and activation services. Limited external system integration and lack of agile delivery encourage a strategic approach in its deployment.

What are the key features?

Strong Language Capabilities: Essential for document reading and interpretation.
Straightforward Workflow Design: Provides ease of use for individuals with basic BPM knowledge.
Detailed Automation Building: Design studio allows comprehensive workflow definitions and scenario planning.
Effective Monitoring: Control room supports detailed automation oversight.

What ROI should users expect?

Efficiency in Task Automation: Automates repetitive tasks in back-office services.
Enhanced Process Integration: Facilitates automation by integrating data inputs in insurance sectors.
Support for Process Mining: Aids in generative AI initiatives and process transformation.
Complex Project Management: Useful in managing large-scale migration projects.

SS&C Blue Prism finds its application across industries. In service industries, it automates repetitive tasks while supporting migration projects. Within the insurance sector, it helps automate claims handling and pricing by integrating data efficiently. Companies use it when transitioning processes, such as upgrading systems from older versions to new applications.

SS&C Technologies

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

AWS, EY, Deloitte, ABBYY, Microsoft, GLYNT.AI, Pfizer, Invesco, Western Union

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. SS&C Blue Prism

September 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. SS&C Blue Prism

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. SS&C Blue Prism and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. SS&C Blue Prism report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors, best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, and best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.