HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum comparison

HP and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. HP is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while Kaspersky is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.5. HP holds a 6.3% mindshare in EPP, compared to Kaspersky’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

HP Wolf Security

Read 8 HP Wolf Security reviews

12,654 Views
10,503 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...

Read 23 Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum reviews

1,656 Views
1,656 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

HP Wolf Security

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

HP Wolf Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum are two prominent security solutions. Kaspersky's comprehensive feature set gives it an edge despite its higher costs.

Features: HP Wolf Security is praised for its strong isolation capabilities, proactive security measures, and straightforward setup. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum receives positive reviews for its advanced threat detection, continuous monitoring, and extensive capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest HP Wolf Security could enhance its reporting capabilities, integration with other security tools, and customer support friendliness. Kaspersky needs improved usability, customer support responsiveness, and a more intuitive user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security is noted for its easy deployment, reliable customer service, and minimal effort required for setup. Kaspersky users report a more complex deployment process but acknowledge the quality of customer service once fully operational.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security is recognized for its competitive pricing and solid return on investment. Kaspersky's higher setup costs are justified by its extensive capabilities, resulting in a positive ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,484 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HP Wolf Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (30th)

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

34th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 6.3%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

Rizki Arya Indracahya

Information Technology Infrastructure Section Head at a consumer goods company with 11-50 employees

Efficient integration and log monitoring enhances security operations

The central management needs improvement. The ease of use for updating and managing through the web console is difficult and lacks features. Integration with Mobile Device Management is not good, and controlling client update times can become problematic. If there is a network issue during an update, it can create junk files on the system, filling up disk space.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"Instead of having to wait for alerts, the IT security team can actively hunt for threats by proactively scanning endpoints to spot anomalies and security breaches."

"The most advantageous aspect is tracking and taking action automatically."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum have met our requirements."

"The solution is easy to use."

"The most advantageous aspect is tracking and taking action automatically."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is effective, especially in isolating computers from the network when needed."

"It offers features like system hardening, vulnerability management, patch management, and device control, which are not present in other solutions."

"What we like most about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is its prompt response. We also like that it does scans on a daily basis, over every laptop or machine we set it for, and it also generates the report daily."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum pros

Cons

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."

"Room for improvement would be keeping up with the rate of change, specifically on Windows platforms. There are a lot of updates that come out for Microsoft Windows operating systems and the Bromium product needs to be able to keep up quickly with those updates and all the browser updates that are coming out. It's hard to do, but that's really where they need to be more responsive because we end up with problems and then we have to call support to get patches, etc."

"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."

"After a major release, there's always a lot of "dust settling." You have to work through all those issues and then you're fine for a while. The problem is, it's stable, it's fine, until the next major release comes out. Then you go back into the cycle again of uncertainty, instability, working through issues until they have patched and remediated all the problems that you're having. It's not unlike any other vendor though"

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."

"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."

More HP Wolf Security cons

"For improvement, they should make the scanning process faster. The scanning and updating take more time."

"EDR Optimum's scalability could be improved."

"The product could be improved by resolving the problem with uninstalling devices. The uninstallation needs better handling, specifically with automatic license deletions."

"The solution needs to give more control to users on firewalls."

"I want the tool’s pricing to improve."

"We would like more data to be available from this solution, in order for it to be usable in strategic decision making."

"What I want to be added to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is a single pane of glass management, where everything is integrated into a single pane of glass."

"To increase the benefits of the product, Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service from Kaspersky should be included."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"Kaspersky gives a consolidated price with a good solution. If we choose something else, we need to add other options on our own."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. You need to pay about 80,000 rupees yearly for the tool. There are no additional costs associated with the product."

"The price is good, not too high."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is affordability, even for companies with limited budgets, such as those in the Pakistani market. It is a subscription-based license."

"The solution could be made a bit cheaper."

"The tool’s pricing is yearly. The solution’s pricing is expensive."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is more affordable than the endpoint security product of Fortinet. Whether it's worth the money depends on your security strategy."

"The price of the solution is reasonable. It cost approximately €10,000 annually."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HP Wolf Security?

The product came as a bundle with the machine.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HP Wolf Security?

The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HP Wolf Security?

I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments.

See all answers

What do you like most about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?

The product's most valuable feature is the flexibility of installation with the console and a simple administration strategy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is reasonably priced for the market. I do not know the exact cost of the license per endpoint or annually.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?

For improvement, I recommend automating the deletion of licenses when uninstalling Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum. The product could be improved by resolving the problem with uni...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 15% of the time

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 12% of the time

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 6% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Compared 12% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Compared 11% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Compared 8% of the time

Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Compared 8% of the time

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

August 2025

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

August 2025

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum report

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum product report

Also Known As

Bromium vSentry

No data available

Overview

HP Wolf Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that bolsters your organization's cyber-resilience on multiple fronts. With its full-stack security approach, it ensures layered protection from hardware to the cloud, providing a robust defense against cyber threats. HP Wolf Security introduces endpoint isolation, a cutting-edge feature that effectively halts threats that may go unnoticed by Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems. Moreover, it extends its security coverage to printers, equipping them with advanced detection and self-healing capabilities to further safeguard your digital ecosystem. This integrated solution streamlines IT and security risk management, resulting in fewer alerts and false positives, and reduces the time and effort required for endpoint incident analysis and remediation. Notably, HP Wolf Security prioritizes productivity, allowing you to manage risk without disrupting the user experience, enabling worry-free work from anywhere, and offering rapid IT disaster recovery at scale.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Optimum delivers straightforward defense-in-depth against complex and advanced threats with no additional overheads. Use automated and 'single-click' responses so you can ensure every last piece of the threat is rooted out of your system.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

Valspar

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

July 2025

Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.