Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
HP Wolf Security Logo

Top 10 HP Wolf Security Alternatives

Vendor: HP
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

Top HP Wolf Security Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to HP Wolf Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Fortinet FortiEDR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

HP Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with HP, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
HP Wolf Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
HP Wolf Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers competitive pricing and faster ROI due to efficient threat management. In comparison, HP Wolf Security provides a comprehensive feature set with robust endpoint isolation and a zero-trust architecture. Buyers may choose Falcon for simplicity or Wolf for its detailed security suite.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. HP Wolf Security Report
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is typically higher, focusing on advanced cybersecurity features, while HP Wolf Security offers a more budget-friendly option with its straightforward setup.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is typically higher, focusing on advanced cybersecurity features, while HP Wolf Security offers a more budget-friendly option with its straightforward setup.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in integration with HP hardware and ease of deployment, ideal for enhancing endpoint device protection. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint stands out for its advanced threat detection, response mechanisms, and integration with Microsoft 365, making it suitable for comprehensive security needs.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
HP Wolf Security has a moderate setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint incurs a higher initial expense. Users highlight the difference in setup affordability between the two solutions, influencing their overall cost evaluations.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a moderate setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint incurs a higher initial expense. Users highlight the difference in setup affordability between the two solutions, influencing their overall cost evaluations.
HP Wolf Security Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
HP Wolf Security Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in threat isolation and malware prevention, making it suitable for organizations seeking strong basic protection at a cost-effective price. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR offers comprehensive threat detection and response capabilities, justifying its higher cost with superior features and better ROI.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security has a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.3 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in advanced threat detection, while HP Wolf Security's unique hardware-based approach offers deep memory protection. In comparison, SentinelOne provides real-time visibility and is easy to deploy. HP Wolf's higher cost reflects its extensive integration with HP hardware for enhanced security.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a setup cost that users find justified by its advanced features, while HP Wolf Security offers a lower setup cost, appealing to those with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a setup cost that users find justified by its advanced features, while HP Wolf Security offers a lower setup cost, appealing to those with budget constraints.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
HP Wolf Security is valued for its robust phishing protection and threat isolation, coupled with reliable customer support and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Microsoft Defender XDR offers advanced threat detection and seamless integration with Microsoft 365, justifying its higher cost with extensive features and superior performance.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Microsoft Defender XDR Report
HP Wolf Security has higher initial setup costs, whereas Microsoft Defender XDR offers a more affordable setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has higher initial setup costs, whereas Microsoft Defender XDR offers a more affordable setup option.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in device protection and user-friendliness, making it cost-effective with straightforward deployment and responsive support. In comparison, Cortex XDR offers advanced threat detection and superior integration, delivering substantial long-term value despite higher setup costs and complex initial deployment.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security offers a competitive setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks may present higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security offers a competitive setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks may present higher initial expenses.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in data protection and cost-effectiveness, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient offers a comprehensive feature set and long-term value, appealing to those seeking extensive capabilities and reliable threat intelligence integration.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security offers an affordable setup while Fortinet FortiClient incurs higher initial costs, making HP Wolf Security a cost-effective option in comparison.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security offers an affordable setup while Fortinet FortiClient incurs higher initial costs, making HP Wolf Security a cost-effective option in comparison.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
4.0 out of 5
Trellix excels in comprehensive customer support and proactive defense through analytics. In comparison, HP Wolf Security focuses on isolation and threat containment with minimal customer service reliance, appealing to those prioritizing simplicity and self-sufficiency. Each offers diverse benefits based on organizational needs.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has straightforward setup costs, while HP Wolf Security offers a feature-rich installation with potentially higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has straightforward setup costs, while HP Wolf Security offers a feature-rich installation with potentially higher initial expenses.
HP Wolf Security Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
HP Wolf Security Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Tanium impresses with real-time data collection and endpoint management, but its setup and resource demands need improvement. In comparison, HP Wolf Security stands out with threat isolation and containment, yet enhancing its malware detection will elevate its performance. Tanium offers better support, while HP Wolf Security simplifies deployment.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Tanium Report
Tanium has a higher setup cost, reflecting its extensive feature set and enterprise-level capabilities, while HP Wolf Security offers a more cost-effective setup process, making it attractive for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium has a higher setup cost, reflecting its extensive feature set and enterprise-level capabilities, while HP Wolf Security offers a more cost-effective setup process, making it attractive for budget-conscious organizations.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Comparing Symantec Endpoint Security and HP Wolf Security reveals significant differences. Symantec Endpoint Security offers advanced threat detection and multi-layered protection. In comparison, HP Wolf Security provides lightweight performance with micro-virtualization technology. Symantec's comprehensive features justify its higher cost, while HP's efficiency delivers better ROI.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to HP Wolf Security, which offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to HP Wolf Security, which offers a more affordable initial setup.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Huntress Managed EDR
4.7 out of 5
HP Wolf Security offers cost-effective endpoint protection with a simple setup, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In contrast, Huntress Managed EDR justifies higher costs with proactive threat detection and detailed network insights, suited for those valuing comprehensive threat management and personalized deployment assistance.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Huntress Managed EDR Report
HP Wolf Security has a higher setup cost compared to Huntress Managed EDR, which offers a more budget-friendly price, highlighting a key distinction in their initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a higher setup cost compared to Huntress Managed EDR, which offers a more budget-friendly price, highlighting a key distinction in their initial investment requirements.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security excels in advanced threat detection and comprehensive protection features. In comparison, HP Wolf Security has strong isolation capabilities and high effectiveness against various attacks. Trend Vision One offers versatile functionalities, while HP Wolf’s targeted feature set frequently provides superior security outcomes.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while HP Wolf Security offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while HP Wolf Security offers a more affordable initial setup.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in threat prevention and management, offering comprehensive security features. In comparison, HP Wolf Security stands out with advanced isolation technology, appealing to those prioritizing strong data protection despite higher costs. Both solutions present unique advantages for tech buyers.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. HP Wolf Security Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is higher, reflecting advanced features, while HP Wolf Security offers a more budget-friendly option with basic setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is higher, reflecting advanced features, while HP Wolf Security offers a more budget-friendly option with basic setup.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive threat detection and strong anti-malware tools with lightweight system impact. In comparison, HP Wolf Security excels with isolation technology, running tasks in micro-VMs. ESET is ideal for broad security needs, while HP Wolf provides enhanced isolation.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. HP Wolf Security Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is known for its higher initial setup costs, while HP Wolf Security offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is known for its higher initial setup costs, while HP Wolf Security offers a more budget-friendly setup.
HP Wolf Security Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
HP Wolf Security Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix is known for its robust patch management and software distribution capabilities, appealing to those requiring strong infrastructure controls. In comparison, HP Wolf Security offers enhanced threat isolation and user-friendly experience, making it attractive for those seeking comprehensive features and higher perceived value.
Download BigFix vs. HP Wolf Security Report
BigFix has an initial setup cost that is generally lower, while HP Wolf Security involves a higher setup cost but provides a more comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has an initial setup cost that is generally lower, while HP Wolf Security involves a higher setup cost but provides a more comprehensive feature set.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in threat detection and pricing, making it cost-effective and easy to deploy with robust customer service. In comparison, Intercept X Endpoint offers superior functionality and advanced threat response features, justifying its higher price with deeper and more effective capabilities.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Intercept X Endpoint Report
HP Wolf Security offers a straightforward setup at a minimal cost, while Intercept X Endpoint involves a higher initial expense. The key difference lies in their setup costs, with HP Wolf Security being notably more budget-friendly.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security offers a straightforward setup at a minimal cost, while Intercept X Endpoint involves a higher initial expense. The key difference lies in their setup costs, with HP Wolf Security being notably more budget-friendly.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
HP Wolf Security offers attractive pricing and ease of deployment, making it suitable for budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone EDR's extensive threat analytics and integration capabilities appeal to enterprises needing comprehensive security. Additionally, Bitdefender's higher initial costs are offset by its robust long-term ROI.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security has a higher setup cost, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a higher setup cost, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in threat containment and intuitive management. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers advanced threat detection and response. HP Wolf Security has competitive pricing, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint justifies higher costs with comprehensive features and detailed analytics, appealing to tech buyers with different needs.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
The setup cost for HP Wolf Security is significantly lower, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment. HP Wolf Security offers a budget-friendly option, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint emphasizes premium features justifying its higher cost.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for HP Wolf Security is significantly lower, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment. HP Wolf Security offers a budget-friendly option, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint emphasizes premium features justifying its higher cost.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in hardware-based endpoint protection, offering cost-effective solutions and personalized support. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Business provides a comprehensive feature set integrated with Microsoft's ecosystem, appealing to those seeking extensive security capabilities despite higher upfront costs.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Microsoft Defender for Business Report
HP Wolf Security setup costs are cited as higher than those for Microsoft Defender for Business. Microsoft Defender offers a more cost-effective setup, making it more attractive for budget-conscious implementations.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security setup costs are cited as higher than those for Microsoft Defender for Business. Microsoft Defender offers a more cost-effective setup, making it more attractive for budget-conscious implementations.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
HP Wolf Security is praised for its isolation technology, effectively containing threats before they spread. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint offers advanced analytics and real-time threat detection. HP Wolf Security's seamless integration into workflows contrasts with Cisco Secure Endpoint's sophisticated analytics capabilities.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security offers a low setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher initial investment but may provide long-term savings.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security offers a low setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher initial investment but may provide long-term savings.
HP Wolf Security Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
HP Wolf Security Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
HP Wolf Security is recognized for strong threat containment and simple management. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR offers advanced threat detection and real-time response. HP Wolf Security could enhance reporting and analytics, while WatchGuard EPDR needs better integration. HP Wolf Security ensures straightforward deployment, WatchGuard EPDR balances costs with extensive features.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
The setup cost for HP Wolf Security is higher compared to WatchGuard EPDR, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for HP Wolf Security is higher compared to WatchGuard EPDR, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Bitdefender Total Security
4.4 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in pricing and support with strong threat containment and minimal disruption. In comparison, Bitdefender Total Security offers comprehensive protection with advanced threat detection. HP is cost-effective, whereas Bitdefender delivers higher value through its extensive features and long-term benefits.
Download Bitdefender Total Security vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, whereas Bitdefender Total Security requires higher setup expenses. HP Wolf Security is more budget-friendly in terms of initial setup costs compared to Bitdefender Total Security.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, whereas Bitdefender Total Security requires higher setup expenses. HP Wolf Security is more budget-friendly in terms of initial setup costs compared to Bitdefender Total Security.
HP Wolf Security Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
HP Wolf Security Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
HP Wolf Security offers advanced threat isolation with virtualization technology, appealing to those needing robust endpoint protection. In comparison, Malwarebytes Teams is recognized for cost-effective, effective malware detection, attracting budget-conscious buyers. Malwarebytes Teams' ease of deployment stands out against HP Wolf Security's comprehensive setup.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Malwarebytes Teams Report
HP Wolf Security has a straightforward setup cost, while Malwarebytes Teams requires a slightly more complex installation fee, highlighting a key difference in initial pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a straightforward setup cost, while Malwarebytes Teams requires a slightly more complex installation fee, highlighting a key difference in initial pricing structure.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Norton Small Business
4.3 out of 5
HP Wolf Security offers advanced malware protection and simplified management. In comparison, Norton Small Business provides extensive device protection and integrated backup solutions. HP Wolf Security excels in installation ease and responsive customer support, while Norton Small Business stands out with comprehensive customer service solutions.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Norton Small Business Report
HP Wolf Security setup cost is {product_a_reviews_section[:setup_cost]}, while Norton Small Business setup cost is {product_b_reviews_section[:setup_cost]}. HP Wolf Security offers a premium setup, contrasting with Norton Small Business's more budget-friendly approach.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security setup cost is {product_a_reviews_section[:setup_cost]}, while Norton Small Business setup cost is {product_b_reviews_section[:setup_cost]}. HP Wolf Security offers a premium setup, contrasting with Norton Small Business's more budget-friendly approach.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
4.0 out of 5
BlackBerry Cylance excels in AI-driven threat detection and cost-effectiveness, appealing to cost-conscious businesses seeking proactive security. In comparison, HP Wolf Security’s hardware-enforced protection and innovative endpoint solutions attract enterprises desiring long-term security benefits and comprehensive device-level coverage.
Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. HP Wolf Security Report
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity requires a higher setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly HP Wolf Security. While both solutions aim at effective cybersecurity, their initial cost can be a decisive factor for potential users.
View comparison
Pricing
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity requires a higher setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly HP Wolf Security. While both solutions aim at effective cybersecurity, their initial cost can be a decisive factor for potential users.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites
4.2 out of 5
HP Wolf Security offers strong endpoint protection and privacy features. In comparison, Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites excels with comprehensive tools, including email and web security. HP Wolf Security has a straightforward deployment process, while Trend Micro requires slightly more effort but provides robust customer support.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites Report
HP Wolf Security has a lower initial setup cost compared to Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites, which requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a lower initial setup cost compared to Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites, which requires a higher initial investment.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert
4.1 out of 5
HP Wolf Security is known for its affordability, straightforward deployment, and proactive customer service, making it a high-value option for many. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers advanced threat detection and extensive analytics, warranting its higher price for those seeking deeper insights and proactive security.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Report
The setup cost for HP Wolf Security is $500, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has a setup cost of $750. HP Wolf Security is more cost-effective compared to Kaspersky.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for HP Wolf Security is $500, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has a setup cost of $750. HP Wolf Security is more cost-effective compared to Kaspersky.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
4.1 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in pricing and support, making it a competitive choice for cost-conscious businesses. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers advanced threat detection and comprehensive tools, appealing to those seeking superior features and performance.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security offers a competitive setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security presents a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security offers a competitive setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security presents a higher initial investment.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security is ideal for those prioritizing cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment. In comparison, OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers advanced AI-driven analytics for comprehensive threat detection, catering to businesses needing robust security capabilities despite a higher investment requirement.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Report
HP Wolf Security involves moderate upfront setup costs, while OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers lower initial fees. HP Wolf Security targets comprehensive enterprise solutions, whereas OpenText Core is more focused on essential endpoint protection.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security involves moderate upfront setup costs, while OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers lower initial fees. HP Wolf Security targets comprehensive enterprise solutions, whereas OpenText Core is more focused on essential endpoint protection.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Trend Micro ServerProtect
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security is praised for its user-friendly setup and virus protection, making it ideal for ease of use. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect offers comprehensive threat detection and network security, appealing to those needing advanced features despite higher pricing.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report
HP Wolf Security has a minimal setup cost, whereas Trend Micro ServerProtect involves a more substantial initial investment. HP Wolf Security is cost-effective for initial deployment in contrast to the higher upfront cost of Trend Micro ServerProtect.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a minimal setup cost, whereas Trend Micro ServerProtect involves a more substantial initial investment. HP Wolf Security is cost-effective for initial deployment in contrast to the higher upfront cost of Trend Micro ServerProtect.
HP Wolf Security Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
HP Wolf Security Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in advanced threat protection and ease of deployment, making it a cost-effective choice with strong customer service. In comparison, ESET Inspect offers comprehensive threat detection and integration features, justifying its higher cost with a superior ROI.
Download ESET Inspect vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security's setup cost is characterized by its competitive pricing, while ESET Inspect's setup cost is noted for being higher but potentially offering more comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security's setup cost is characterized by its competitive pricing, while ESET Inspect's setup cost is noted for being higher but potentially offering more comprehensive features.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection
4.0 out of 5
HP Wolf Security offers user-friendly threat isolation and secure browsing, ideal for efficiency. In comparison, Trend Micro Smart Protection excels in advanced threat detection and multi-layered protection. Tech buyers choose HP Wolf for easy deployment and Trend Micro for its comprehensive feature set and strong ROI.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
HP Wolf Security incurs lower setup costs than Trend Micro Smart Protection, but Trend Micro offers a broader range of features.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security incurs lower setup costs than Trend Micro Smart Protection, but Trend Micro offers a broader range of features.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Kaspersky Total Security
4.1 out of 5
HP Wolf Security offers cost-effective, quick deployment and strong basic protection. In comparison, Kaspersky Total Security provides more features like parental controls and password management despite higher costs. HP's better pricing suits small budgets, while Kaspersky's extensive features justify its higher investment.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Total Security Report
HP Wolf Security has higher setup costs compared to Kaspersky Total Security, which offers a more affordable initial expenditure.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has higher setup costs compared to Kaspersky Total Security, which offers a more affordable initial expenditure.
HP Wolf Security Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
HP Wolf Security Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
HP Wolf Security and Morphisec offer unique features and values. HP Wolf Security is preferred for cost and customer support. In comparison, Morphisec excels in advanced threat detection and is valued for its high ROI. Both have strengths, making each suitable for different needs.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Morphisec Report
HP Wolf Security involves higher setup costs compared to Morphisec, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option, making Morphisec the more affordable choice in terms of initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security involves higher setup costs compared to Morphisec, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option, making Morphisec the more affordable choice in terms of initial expenses.
HP Wolf Security Logo
Sophos EPP Suite
4.1 out of 5
HP Wolf Security Logo
Sophos EPP Suite
4.1 out of 5
Sophos EPP Suite excels in threat detection and proactive protection capabilities. In comparison, HP Wolf Security stands out with integration and comprehensive security layers. Sophos EPP Suite is noted for straightforward deployment and competitive pricing, while HP Wolf Security, despite higher costs, provides advanced features and strong ROI.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Sophos EPP Suite Report
Sophos EPP Suite features a competitive setup cost, while HP Wolf Security has a slightly higher initial setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos EPP Suite features a competitive setup cost, while HP Wolf Security has a slightly higher initial setup expense.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
4.0 out of 5
HP Wolf Security offers robust protection mechanisms valued for advanced threat protection and isolation capabilities. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection provides a comprehensive feature set with extensive threat detection and response features, delivering better ROI despite higher costs, making it a preferred option for extensive security needs.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report
HP Wolf Security has a low initial setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection presents a slightly higher setup cost but offers more advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a low initial setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection presents a slightly higher setup cost but offers more advanced features.
HP Wolf Security Logo
Avast Business Hub
4.1 out of 5
HP Wolf Security Logo
Avast Business Hub
4.1 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in pricing and support, offering advanced threat protection and seamless integration. In comparison, Avast Business Hub provides a comprehensive security suite with real-time threat detection and centralized management. Tech buyers seeking usability might choose HP Wolf, while those prioritizing features might prefer Avast.
Download Avast Business Hub vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security features minimal initial setup costs, contrasting with Avast Business Hub's higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security features minimal initial setup costs, contrasting with Avast Business Hub's higher setup expenses.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise
4.0 out of 5
HP Wolf Security offers affordable, efficient threat isolation and containment, along with straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise provides advanced threat intelligence and machine learning capabilities, appealing to enterprises needing feature-rich, comprehensive protection despite higher costs and occasional setup complexities.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report
HP Wolf Security has a higher setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise. Users noted the differences in initial expenditure between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a higher setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise. Users noted the differences in initial expenditure between the two solutions.
HP Wolf Security Logo
Uptycs
4.0 out of 5
HP Wolf Security Logo
Uptycs
4.0 out of 5
Uptycs offers robust security analytics and monitoring capabilities, making it invaluable for threat detection and compliance management. Its notable features include cloud-native security and endpoint detection. Some reviewers mention there is room for improvement in scalability to better support increasingly complex environments.
View comparison
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Absolute Secure Endpoint
1 out of 5

See all devices, on and off your network, and collect hundreds of hardware, software, security status, usage, and geolocation data points automatically, with 365 days of historical logs.

View comparison
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud
3.7 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels with robust support and attractive pricing, making it ideal for cost-conscious buyers focused on advanced threat containment and easy management. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, with higher costs, offers comprehensive features appealing to those requiring extensive protection and centralized management.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Report
HP Wolf Security requires a higher upfront setup cost, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. HP Wolf Security justifies its cost with robust features not typically found in Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security requires a higher upfront setup cost, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. HP Wolf Security justifies its cost with robust features not typically found in Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Avast BreachGuard
1 out of 5

Protect your personal information and know what to do if your privacy comes under attack. 
Check for leaks of your personal info, and protect it from hackers. Stop companies from collecting and selling your personal info. Get help adjusting the privacy settings of your online accounts. Resolve identity theft issues with the support of our Identity Assist team.

View comparison
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
4.0 out of 5
HP Wolf Security offers robust malware protection and ease of integration, making it a cost-effective choice with solid ROI. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR provides advanced threat detection and response features, justifying its higher cost with comprehensive security and high value.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security has a low setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) has a moderate setup cost. HP Wolf Security is more affordable upfront compared to Bitdefender GravityZone XDR.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a low setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) has a moderate setup cost. HP Wolf Security is more affordable upfront compared to Bitdefender GravityZone XDR.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
VIPRE Endpoint Security
3.5 out of 5
HP Wolf Security offers advanced threat detection and isolation, while VIPRE Endpoint Security provides comprehensive malware protection and easy integration. In comparison, HP Wolf Security includes AI capabilities and automated responses, whereas VIPRE Endpoint Security is valued for its simplicity and robust malware protection.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security Report
HP Wolf Security has a higher initial setup cost than VIPRE Endpoint Security, making VIPRE a more cost-effective choice for users prioritizing budget.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a higher initial setup cost than VIPRE Endpoint Security, making VIPRE a more cost-effective choice for users prioritizing budget.
HP Wolf Security Logo
Avira Prime
1 out of 5
HP Wolf Security Logo
Avira Prime
1 out of 5
Users appreciate Avira Prime for robust online security, efficient device optimization, and privacy protection. The comprehensive antivirus protection, VPN services for secure browsing, and system cleanup tools are highly valued. While users praise its ease in managing multiple devices and increased online security, some express concerns about slow performance, high pricing, and occasional technical issues.
View comparison
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Kaspersky TOTAL Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
HP Wolf Security is known for advanced threat protection and a zero-trust approach, while Kaspersky TOTAL Security offers multi-layered protection and tools like file encryption. HP Wolf Security is valued for affordability and easy deployment. In comparison, Kaspersky offers more features and higher ROI.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky TOTAL Security for Business Report
HP Wolf Security has a lower setup cost, while Kaspersky TOTAL Security for Business has a higher upfront investment. The initial expense for HP Wolf Security is budget-friendly compared to the more substantial setup cost of Kaspersky.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a lower setup cost, while Kaspersky TOTAL Security for Business has a higher upfront investment. The initial expense for HP Wolf Security is budget-friendly compared to the more substantial setup cost of Kaspersky.
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform
3.3 out of 5
HP Wolf Security offers superior endpoint protection, enhanced threat isolation, and a user-friendly management system. In comparison, Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform impresses with advanced threat detection, integration capabilities, and detailed analytics. HP is preferred for simplicity and support; Kaspersky excels in extensive security measures.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform Report
HP Wolf Security has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation. Kaspersky requires a higher initial investment but offers advanced features for targeted attacks.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation. Kaspersky requires a higher initial investment but offers advanced features for targeted attacks.
HP Wolf Security Logo
Total Security
1 out of 5
HP Wolf Security Logo
Total Security
1 out of 5
Users utilize Total Security for cyber protection, including threat detection, firewall management, and antivirus functionality. Appreciated features include real-time monitoring, ease of deployment, robust firewall, minimal system impact, and advanced parental controls. Users seek improved support response times, better malware detection, clearer documentation, and fewer false positives.
View comparison
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
GoSecure Endpoint Detection and Response
1 out of 5

CounterTack Sentinel is architected to fit the demands of today’s enterprise security professional. Sentinel scales to large, distributed and sophisticated environments, leveraging attacker-based technology to collect endpoint data to help teams cut down investigatory cycles associated with incident response.

View comparison
HP Wolf Security Logo
HP Wolf Security Logo
Malwarebytes for Business
1 out of 5
Businesses use Malwarebytes for Business to protect against malware, viruses, and ransomware. Users appreciate its threat detection, ease of deployment, and scan performance. Endpoint protection, centralized management, and minimal system impact are favored. However, users report the need for improved false positives, detection rates, customer support, and real-time scanning speed.
View comparison

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)