We performed a comparison between GoToMeeting and Polycom RealPresence Clariti based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Ease of setup and login by attendees. Facilitates sharing visually, and not just via audio."
"Pricing is reasonable. It's not expensive. The pricing is one of the great selling points for the product."
"GoToMeeting's security is very good. I've never known anybody to crash a GoToMeeting."
"The key advantage of GoToMeeting is the ability to use it without installing anything."
"Screenshare is the most valuable feature as well as the number of meeting participants possible in a meeting. It also has good quality."
"It works, it's reliable."
"The solution worked well specifically for audio meetings."
"Even for somebody who does not have a lot of experience, they can easily use it."
"The most valuable feature is its integration with solutions like Zoom and Teams for endpoints. The picture quality is high, and the conference sessions are stable."
"It's on-prem, which is great."
"It does a good job of integrating with other software."
"I don't know whether it is an issue or not but my boss was asking me if person one is in one room, and another person wanted to use another room at the same time, I don't know whether it is possible."
"Using GoToMeeting in a meeting-sized conference room is kind of a letdown. The camera is supposed to track the speaker and focus on that person so that they can be on the screen. That feature rarely worked. We tested it thoroughly, so maybe it was an issue with the size of the conference room. It may not be suitable for large conference rooms."
"The solution could scale a bit easier if you need to add more people to meetings."
"The product itself doesn't stand out against other options on the market."
"In the next release, I would for it to incorporate files more efficiently from one computer to another when we covert things and send them out. I'm not sure if it's capable of that."
"Manageability needs to be improved."
"I would like to see better support for mobile devices."
"The interface is a little outdated and could be better."
"The most valuable feature is its integration with solutions like Zoom and Teams for endpoints. The picture quality is high, and the conference sessions are stable."
"Could have a wider range of use cases."
"The customer needs this platform to be a little bit more customized."
GoToMeeting is ranked 11th in Virtual Meetings with 24 reviews while Polycom RealPresence Clariti is ranked 15th in Virtual Meetings with 3 reviews. GoToMeeting is rated 7.8, while Polycom RealPresence Clariti is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of GoToMeeting writes "It features low latency, which is crucial because everybody is using VPN to connect to their PCs at work". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polycom RealPresence Clariti writes "Increases the ability of Teams when collaboration is required". GoToMeeting is most compared with Skype for Business, Zoom, TeamViewer, Adobe Connect and BlueJeans Meetings, whereas Polycom RealPresence Clariti is most compared with Cisco TelePresence and Cisco Meeting Server. See our GoToMeeting vs. Polycom RealPresence Clariti report.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
