Genpact Cora SeQuence vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint comparison

Genpact and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Genpact is ranked #37, while OpenText is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.3. Genpact holds a 0.8% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Genpact users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Genpact Cora SeQuence

Read 2 Genpact Cora SeQuence reviews

647 Views
589 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Read 17 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews

805 Views
757 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Genpact Cora SeQuence

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and Genpact Cora SeQuence are leading workflow management solutions, each enhancing enterprise efficiency. Genpact Cora SeQuence appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced automation and superior ROI potential.

Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint provides seamless SharePoint integration, enhancing document management and collaboration within Microsoft environments. It supports effective workflow management through simplified processes and streamlines task allocations to improve productivity. Genpact Cora SeQuence offers end-to-end process automation with advanced analytics and AI-driven capabilities for optimal decision-making. It enables complex automation tasks, improving efficiency across diverse business functions with greater agility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers a user-friendly cloud deployment model, ideal for enhancing SharePoint environments, and strong support services aiding integration. Genpact Cora SeQuence supports scalable cloud deployment options, allowing flexibility in complex automation setups, along with responsive customer service that addresses diverse enterprise needs efficiently.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint provides competitive startup costs, appealing for organizations operating within Microsoft environments, although ROI depends on usage scale. Genpact Cora SeQuence, while demanding a higher initial investment, offers comprehensive automation capabilities, generally delivering greater long-term ROI for businesses focusing on advanced process automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Genpact Cora SeQuence

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

37th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

25th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Genpact Cora SeQuence is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText 360 for SharePoint	0.9%
Genpact Cora SeQuence	0.8%
Other	98.3%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

it_user1041942

Consultant at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

Good reporting, a very good dashboard, and easy to set up

We primarily use the solution for processes like preparing worksheets. It's essential to the human resource process like expenses and allowances The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good. The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more…

Read full review

Sasikumar Balachandran

Senior BI Lead at Cognizant

Enhancing user experience and data management with effective central repository capabilities

The area of improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint is that sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently. In future updates, I would want to see widgets available in OpenText 360 for SharePoint to interact with third-party tools. For example, when creating a dashboard, having the ability to embed these directly into SharePoint would be beneficial. Currently, I have to use hyperlinks to access other tools such as Tableau or ClickView. If it were possible to merge everything and bring all information from multiple teams (Cognos, ClickView, AWS) into SharePoint as a centralized place, it would be really helpful. That is what I envision for the integrator part.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very stable. There is no downtime."

"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."

"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."

"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."

"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."

"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."

"OpenText 360 for SharePoint integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Teams, allowing me to monitor and manage projects and task issues using mobile devices."

"The overall benefit I get from using this solution is developing in a more secure environment with distributed architecture and even distribution of work across resources where full control on the code and repository is required."

"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."

"We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros

Cons

"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."

"The setup and configuration is complex."

"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."

"The GUI should be improved for better user experience. Additionally, while there are standard connectors for automation and approvals in Power Platform, some tasks still need to be handled with API request calls instead of direct connectors, which could be improved."

"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."

"The user interface could definitely be improved."

"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."

"Sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently."

"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."

"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."

"The solution has a very complex pricing model."

"On-premises version is expensive"

"SharePoint uses a subscription model."

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."

"It has a reasonable price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Regarding the licensing setup cost and price overall, the licensing costs are reasonable. As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft par...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

See all answers

Comparisons

Appian vs Genpact Cora SeQuence

Compared 31% of the time

Hubble vs Genpact Cora SeQuence

Compared 22% of the time

IBM BPM vs Genpact Cora SeQuence

Compared 20% of the time

Studio Creatio vs Genpact Cora SeQuence

Compared 15% of the time

Tranzax vs Genpact Cora SeQuence

Compared 12% of the time

More Genpact Cora SeQuence Competitors

Camunda vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 16% of the time

Bizagi vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 15% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 13% of the time

CMW Tracker vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 13% of the time

BIC Platform vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 13% of the time

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

January 2026

Download Genpact Cora SeQuence product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

January 2026

Download OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report

Also Known As

Sequence BPM Suite, PNMsoft Sequence BPM Suite

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360

Overview

Sequence is a BPMS (Business Process Management Software) solution. Its development environment provides an environment for designing forms, tasks, messages, system integration, and flow connections. Sequence processes are, by default, operated from within a Microsoft SharePoint site. Sequence supports integration with Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services to enable managers to analyze performance and determine trends relating to KPIs and SLAs. In addition to integrating with Microsoft Office, SharePoint, and Dynamics products, it can be integrated with external systems through protocols such as web services, WCF. It also enables connection to enterprise applications such as SAP and Oracle.Â The product's architecture enables IT personnel to make changes to processes without taking them offline.

Genpact

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

OpenText

Sample Customers

South West Water, Atkins, Wolters Kluwer, Hazera Genetics, GeRAP, Aon Hewitt, Atos Origin, SwiftTrade

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)

Buyer's Guide

Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

December 2025

Free Report: Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.