We performed a comparison between Genpact Cora SeQuence and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"It is efficient in reducing costs."
"It continues to keep up with the changing needs of the business. That is the strong value proposition of BPM. It's not a one-time automation."
"Our customers use the solution as a workflow platform to manage their processes."
"This is one of the best tools to support the business and the way we work, and the numerous processes we need to implement."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of IBM BPM."
"With the Process Center, I can go to one place and view what all the environments are doing."
"The Process Designer is good. We like how we can drag and drop and link the processes up, that works out great for us."
"The most valuable features are the integration capabilities - BPM can connect with almost any legacy or advanced system."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
"The analysis reports could be much better."
"IBM BPM integrated with Spark UI and the UI is now much better, but they still need to improve the UI because competitors have predefined templates and other additional features. In these competitor's solutions, you are able to use the templates, map your data, and the form is ready to use. With this solution, you need to write a lot of code to have the same quality as the competitor's templates. It would be a benefit to make this platform more towards low-code or no-code."
"We need process monitoring. It is somewhat complex to monitor all the processes which work."
"We thought there might have been a little more discussion early on about, "Hey, if you're doing this, set it up this way," or some best practices or some guidance that we didn't get."
"We would like better performance and more visibility on each step of the tool."
"Stability wavers. We have some opportunities for improvement in this space, especially as we approach our target volume of a million transactions a day. It is tough, because it is not necessarily the product. It is more around the platform and infrastructure to support it, so the connectivity to the database, web sessions, and reverse proxies in front of that."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"It needs more customization. We like to customize the screens to show more things related to our company."
Earn 20 points
Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 38th in Business Process Management (BPM) while IBM BPM is ranked 6th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Appian, Hubble and Tungsten TotalAgility, whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, IBM Business Automation Workflow, Pega BPM, Appian and Apache Airflow.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.