Eggplant Test vs Ranorex Studio vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Keysight Technologies and Ranorex are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.3, while Ranorex is ranked #15. Keysight Technologies holds a 4.3% mindshare in TAt, compared to Ranorex’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Ranorex users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

3,848 Views
2,617 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

3,518 Views
2,850 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 113 Tricentis Tosca reviews

18,376 Views
12,312 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Ranorex Studio

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Eggplant Test, Ranorex Studio, and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, Worksoft and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,444 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 4.3%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 4.3%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 13.4%, down from 22.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tricentis Tosca	13.4%
Eggplant Test	4.3%
Ranorex Studio	4.3%
Other	78.0%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

reviewer2740515

Senior Software Engineer 2 at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Automation test development becomes accessible and effective for functional testers

Tricentis Tosca is a codeless tool, making it easy for everyone to understand the transition of how to develop scenarios or test cases. In Tricentis Tosca, analyzing failures is straightforward because every time it fails somewhere, I get the screenshot, which helps me analyze how and why it failed. It has all the modules, including some pre-built ones that can be reused efficiently. Compared to other code tools such as Selenium, where I used to develop one script in one day, with Tricentis Tosca I can easily develop one script in four hours or three hours, saving four to five hours in a day.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has enabled true end-to-end testing."

"Prior to using the product, all regression testing was done manually for our POS system, and now regression test packs are 70% automated."

"DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use the controller to run scripts rather than having to translate things to models. There are lots of options."

"It has definitely improved the quality of our software."

"Good text reading ability."

"We did see a massive return on investment from using Eggplant."

"These days I use only Eggplant since it is very easy to use, especially in the function test, and in the UI test, and it's better than other tools."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create code from a flow chart, and then run the code through it."

More Eggplant Test pros

"We tried using HP QTP and Selenium, but opted for Ranorex because of its reasonable price and the ease of use of the automation tool."

"With a small team of one onshore person and three offshore people, I was able to show the value of $90,000 savings for a project as a POC and the customer is currently using this tool for several other projects in their organization after seeing the ROI for one project."

"Object identification is good."

"I tried to use different products Selenium, TestComplete, amongst others, but this was very familiar, fast, adaptable and flexible."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is its user-friendly interface."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is the capture and replay tool, where when you launch any application from Ranorex Studio it automatically captures the test case steps and the next time you can replay the tool so the flow automatically happens again."

"Based on my experience, this would be my tool of choice for test automation."

"In this particular area Ranorex proved to be a perfect choice."

More Ranorex Studio pros

"Tosca can give us the UI plus the backend mainframe and API testing within one tool."

"Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people."

"The product is extremely stable and provides excellent value."

"Image recognition: It has allowed us to automate a GUI section of our product which involves drawing different topologies."

"It was the only way to organize and support automation testing process for our re-insurance tool for underwriters."

"I am very happy using the product and also whenever I have asked for remote sessions, the agents always agreed."

"From the commercial tool perspective, Tosca is a leader in every aspect."

"The item that is different from all the other tools is that it's module based."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"We found that we had issues regarding the VPN setup, which is one of the reasons that we did not purchase this solution."

"They need to update the Linux. I think it's kind of an outdated Java Swing application."

"The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab and it would create a template of a constructor for me... It would be great, when I want to create a new function, if there were shortcut commands like those that helped create all of the functions, or if there were shortcut features to do any of the complex plans."

"Eggplant Test should emphasize on improving its offering in non-Windows environments."

"The biggest issue I had was the crashing. You could be in the middle of setting up and writing up a nice little script and then it would crash."

"A step forward would be to have event support; supporting different events."

"A step forward would be to have event support, because it is more or less linear at the moment."

"It has low productivity."

More Eggplant Test cons

"The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler."

"There was one instance where I had an issue and contacted them for a solution; they were unable to provide it, and I ended up finding a workaround on my own."

"The current version of Ranorex Studio IDE is based on an old version of SharpDevelop IDE (3.2), but this is going to change soon (planned update to SharpDevelop 4.x)."

"It needs a better connection to TFS."

"We are mainly working for manufacturing OEMs but the integration is not available. It would be a benefit if they built one integration tool for all the Teamcenter home servers and software as the main PLM data source. It is a simple process at this time, the integration could be made easier."

"Tests will fail if browser minimised, Parallel Execution Not possible (We could do are some extend if we use DOM method)."

"Stability was an issue."

"Part of the challenge is that Ranorex's support is over in Europe, so we can't get responses on the same day. If we had support in the United States that was a bit more timely, that would be helpful."

More Ranorex Studio cons

"I have found that some of the functions could be missed in the solution for new users."

"First, Tricentis could improve Tosca's Linux scripting. We can automate Linux scripting, but there are a few commands that Tosca doesn't support. DVS support and the object identification mechanism could also be better."

"The tool lags in client-based applications. We have also encountered issues with the features in integrations."

"It requires some coding customization that requires expertise, so having free services along with the licenses would be good."

"The self-healing feature of Tricentis Tosca needs significant improvement. Currently, it is static and not dynamic."

"The Vision AI implementation works very slowly, affecting the speed of our work. The exploratory testing feature is not working for version 2023.1, which we are currently using."

"The document object model or some aspects of it has a bit of a learning curve."

"It needs better integration with JIRA."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"Pricing for Tricentis Tosca could be improved because it's very expensive."

"We have around 200 [concurrent] licenses and the cost around $1.4 million a year."

"If you are purchasing less than five licenses, then the pricing is high. On a scale from one to ten, with one being low and ten being high pricing, I would rate this solution at eight."

"There is an annual cost for Tricentis."

"The pricing and licensing of Tricentis Tosca were alright. Many customers look for end-to-end enterprise solutions, there were not many challenges with the pricing. However, the customers who are coming from Selenium or similar, feel they're paying a premium for this Tricentis Tosca license. If the right person is there for the implementation of the Tricentis Tosca, then it is one of the best tools in the market."

"The price of the tool is a problem for a lot of Brazilian clients or Latino clients, as it is expensive. Where I work, if one is low price and ten is high price, I rate the tool's price as a ten out of ten."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is on the higher side."

"Tricentis Tosca is an expensive solution and there is an annual license required. The whole licensing process is confusing and it could be made easier."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

No data available

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	72

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interf...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Eggplant Test

Compared 4% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 4% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 3% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 6% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 5% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 5% of the time

Original Software TestDrive vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 3% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 6% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 4% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 4% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

March 2026

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

March 2026

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

March 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

No data available

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, Worksoft and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.