OpenText Functional Testing and Eggplant Test offer functional testing solutions with different strengths. OpenText has the upper hand with its broader system compatibility, while Eggplant is favored for its AI and ease of use.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing offers cross-browser and cross-platform capabilities with robust object recognition and seamless integration with legacy systems. It is versatile in handling diverse environments, which enhances its reliability for complex automation tasks. Eggplant Test excels with its advanced AI capabilities, making it easy to use for OCR and image recognition. It is especially useful in quick deployment scenarios where minimal coding is required.
Room for Improvement:OpenText Functional Testing could benefit from enhanced performance and browser compatibility, and users have noted slow execution on certain platforms, specifically in Windows environments. Eggplant Test would improve with better handling of test data and enhanced external tool integration. The extension beyond linear scripting to event-based functionalities and broader language support would increase its flexibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:OpenText Functional Testing mainly supports on-premises deployment with limited cloud integration, and its customer support is noted to be slow. Eggplant Test, while also primarily on-premises, offers some public cloud flexibility. Customer service feedback is mixed, with some areas requiring more efficient problem resolution.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing is known for higher pricing, justified by its extensive system support and functionalities for enterprise-grade testing. Users experience licensing complexity but recognize potential long-term ROI through improved testing coverage. Eggplant Test is perceived as expensive for smaller companies, despite its bundled support. Both tools offer considerable ROI, with OpenText providing greater value in large, complex testing operations, while Eggplant appeals to cost-sensitive environments needing ease of use.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Eggplant Test offers 24x7 support.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
The two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
It can auto-heal the test cases and suggest new paths for testing, enhancing our ability to automate end-to-end journeys across various applications.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
The best features of OpenText Functional Testing include descriptive programming, the ability to add objects in the repository, and its ease of use for UI compared to other tools.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 8.9% |
| Eggplant Test | 4.1% |
| Other | 87.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.
With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
