Eggplant Test vs OpenText Functional Testing comparison

Keysight Technologies and OpenText are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.3, while OpenText is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.7. Keysight Technologies holds a 3.8% mindshare in TAt, compared to OpenText’s 7.9% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

3,512 Views
2,248 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing

Read 98 OpenText Functional Testing reviews

7,852 Views
6,046 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

OpenText Functional Testing

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Functional Testing and Eggplant Test both compete in automated software testing. OpenText holds an advantage in object recognition and platform compatibility, while Eggplant excels in image recognition and scriptless testing.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing supports a wide range of platforms and technologies, provides extensive browser support, and excels in both GUI and API testing. Eggplant Test offers advanced image recognition and Optical Character Recognition (OCR), enabling robust cross-platform testing and AI-driven, scriptless testing.

Room for Improvement: OpenText needs enhancements in resource consumption, integration complexity, and scripting ease. Browser compatibility can also improve. Eggplant could use improved documentation, a more user-friendly interface, and better complex script support. Expanding integration with other tools and reducing cost would boost its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText primarily offers on-premises deployment with private cloud options, facing mixed customer service reviews. Eggplant provides flexible deployment with both on-premises and public cloud options, albeit with lower-rated customer service due to delays and costs.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText has high licensing costs, justified by extensive capabilities and support, with substantial ROI due to automation benefits. Eggplant, although also costly, emphasizes its support and stability, ensuring high ROI through reduced testing time and increased accuracy, especially for enterprises with large testing volumes.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Functional Testing Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Functional Testing

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.7

Eggplant Test automation cut testing time and costs, saving $75,000 per tester and achieving fast ROI with increased efficiency.

Sentiment score

6.8

OpenText Functional Testing boosts ROI by enhancing efficiency with AI, reducing manual efforts, and accelerating test execution time.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.

Badari Mallireddy

QA Automation Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.

Andres_Gomez

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.

Pierre CAHAY

Senior Manager at Deloitte

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Functional Testing report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.5

Eggplant Test customer service is praised for quick, knowledgeable support, despite some time zone and coverage challenges.

Sentiment score

6.1

OpenText Functional Testing's customer service is praised for responsiveness, but support experiences vary in wait times and issue resolution.

I'm not impressed because it depends on the resolution of the screen, so I wouldn't highly recommend this tool.

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Eggplant Test offers 24x7 support.

Naresh Nathala

Practice Head - QA at IdeaBytes

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.

Badari Mallireddy

QA Automation Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.

Andres_Gomez

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

The technical support is rated eight out of ten.

Pierre CAHAY

Senior Manager at Deloitte

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Functional Testing report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

5.5

Eggplant Test scales well and integrates strongly but faces challenges with licensing costs and performance slowdowns in large packs.

Sentiment score

7.1

OpenText Functional Testing is scalable with proper license management and infrastructure, excelling in test automation scalability and integration.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

Running them in parallel allows you to consume multiple runtime licenses and just execute the tests that don't have conflicting priorities and get through a lot of volume much quicker.

Kevin Copple

Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.

Andres_Gomez

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Functional Testing report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.1

Eggplant Test is praised for stability and responsive support but faces occasional crashes, latency, and high resource usage.

Sentiment score

6.6

OpenText Functional Testing performs well on suitable hardware, but stability varies with new features and requires strategic implementation.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Functional Testing report

Room For Improvement

Eggplant Test struggles with usability, integration, setup issues, and outdated features, requiring improvements in performance, support, and accessibility.

OpenText Functional Testing is criticized for high memory usage, slow performance, poor compatibility, and requires technical skills and costly investment.

For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective.

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

The two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture.

Naresh Nathala

Practice Head - QA at IdeaBytes

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.

Andres_Gomez

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.

Badari Mallireddy

QA Automation Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Functional Testing report

Setup Cost

Eggplant Test is costly yet ideal for large enterprises, with execution-only licenses offering better cost-effectiveness than competitors.

Despite its high cost and complex pricing, OpenText Functional Testing is valued for support and features, offering flexible licenses.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.

Badari Mallireddy

QA Automation Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.

Pierre CAHAY

Senior Manager at Deloitte

It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.

Andres_Gomez

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Functional Testing report

Valuable Features

Eggplant Test excels in cross-platform testing with AI-driven automation, simplifying processes and enhancing collaboration through modular scripts.

OpenText Functional Testing enhances automation efficiency with AI tools, platform compatibility, and support for diverse technologies.

It can auto-heal the test cases and suggest new paths for testing, enhancing our ability to automate end-to-end journeys across various applications.

Naresh Nathala

Practice Head - QA at IdeaBytes

It can integrate with GitHub, allowing you to work with DevOps pipelines, so whenever you make changes in GitHub, it runs and checks the smoke testing on the server.

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.

Badari Mallireddy

QA Automation Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

OpenText Functional Testing has an impressive ability to connect to mobile devices and its ability to test so many different types of software, whether it be mainframe, APIs, mobile, web, or desktop.

Kevin Copple

Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

The best features of OpenText Functional Testing include descriptive programming, the ability to add objects in the repository, and its ease of use for UI compared to other tools.

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Functional Testing report

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (13th)

OpenText Functional Testing

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 3.8%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing is 7.9%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Functional Testing	7.9%
Eggplant Test	3.8%
Other	88.3%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Badari Mallireddy

QA Automation Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Automation becomes feasible with diverse application support and faster development

I have used UFT for web application automation, desktop application automation, and Oracle ERP automation UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use. It requires less coding, has built-in features for API testing, and most importantly, it supports more than just web…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	71

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

Reducing the levels of support is something they could continue to improve. They tend to have an entry-level person that may not be as familiar with the product that fields the calls, which creates...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 13% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 10% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 8% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 5% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 9% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 6% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 6% of the time

BrowserStack vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

December 2025

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing

December 2025

Download OpenText Functional Testing product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.

OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?

Multiplatform Compatibility: Works seamlessly across technologies, browsers, and platforms.
Automation Span: Provides automation for APIs, GUIs, SAP, and Oracle applications.
Intuitive Design: Object identification and recording simplify usage for all coding levels.
Integration Capabilities: Interfaces with tools like Jenkins and ALM for streamlined testing.
Built-in Frameworks: Offers frameworks like BPT for accelerated test development.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Manual Testing: Minimizes the effort required for manual testing tasks.
Time Efficiency: Accelerates testing processes with user-friendly features.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with CI/CD tools, enhancing operational productivity.
Comprehensive Coverage: Automates test cases involving multiple scenarios effectively.

In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.

OpenText

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Functional Testing

November 2025

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Functional Testing

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Functional Testing and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Functional Testing report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.