We performed a comparison between CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault and Imprivata OneSign based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HashiCorp, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Enterprise Password Managers."CyberArk is a good and adaptive solution. It is easy to adopt and install. It is easy for every use case."
"It's a good solution, it works, and the bank is happy with it."
"CyberArk makes our environment more secure and prevents possible attacks by compromised accounts."
"Thus far I can say technical support is excellent. We haven't had any issues or difficulties."
"Our most valuable features would probably be key rotation, the SKM or SSH key manager, and account discovery."
"PSM enables after-hours monitoring."
"The most valuable feature is that it is flexible. It has many connectors. that have done well, the EPV and SSH sessions are all being recorded and everything works fine."
"It's highly secure and very flexible. It gives us all types of storage options and it gives us a high level of security."
"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack."
"It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution."
"The initial setup can get complex."
"To get it to a ten it should give other possibilities to select if you could follow the keystrokes. It should have a flexibility with things where people can use it a lot faster."
"The initial setup could be simpler but it may not be as effective."
"I think they can improve account onboarding. For instance, you have to use the Password Vault utility, whereas in Thycotic I think there is a feature in the user interface that allows you to upload your account with an Excel file. So I'd like to have a similar thing in CyberArk."
"CyberArk's license is too expensive. I rate it seven out of 10 for affordability."
"The license is expensive."
"There is a little bit of confusion in the implementation part, especially when one tries to understand the actual working of the product."
"We should be able to join small components."
"They should have a landing page."
"I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."
More CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is ranked 4th in Enterprise Password Managers with 48 reviews while Imprivata OneSign is ranked 12th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews. CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is rated 8.4, while Imprivata OneSign is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault writes "Helps to store system accounts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imprivata OneSign writes "Reasonably priced, performs well, easy to deploy, and has responsive technical support". CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Delinea Secret Server and BeyondTrust Password Safe, whereas Imprivata OneSign is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Evidian Enterprise SSO, Okta Workforce Identity, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Keeper.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.