Top 10 Imprivata OneSign Alternatives

4.5 out of 5

4 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top Imprivata OneSign Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Imprivata OneSign based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Imprivata OneSign surpasses its competitors by offering seamless authentication management and secure access control, featuring innovative capabilities like single sign-on, robust security measures, and intuitive user experiences tailored for healthcare environments, enhancing productivity and compliance effortlessly.

Imprivata Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Imprivata, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Entra ID

4.3 out of 5

Microsoft Entra ID

4.3 out of 5

Imprivata OneSign's single sign-on and pricing attract efficiency-focused buyers. In comparison, Microsoft Entra ID's extensive integration capabilities and advanced security features appeal to those needing comprehensive functionality. Imprivata OneSign excels in customer service, while Microsoft Entra ID may require better support resources.

Download Imprivata OneSign vs. Microsoft Entra ID Report

Pricing

Imprivata OneSign has a high initial setup cost, while Microsoft Entra ID offers a more budget-friendly setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Imprivata OneSign has a high initial setup cost, while Microsoft Entra ID offers a more budget-friendly setup.

Okta Workforce Identity

4.3 out of 5

Okta Workforce Identity

4.3 out of 5

Imprivata OneSign is known for its strong integration with healthcare applications and fast access features, making it suitable for the healthcare sector. In comparison, Okta Workforce Identity excels with its multi-factor authentication, cloud integration, and adaptive security policies, offering comprehensive identity management functionalities.

Download Imprivata OneSign vs. Okta Workforce Identity Report

Pricing

Imprivata OneSign setup cost is affordable with straightforward integration, while Okta Workforce Identity setup cost is higher and includes comprehensive advanced features. The difference highlights Imprivata's focus on simplicity versus Okta's in-depth customization options.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

4.0 out of 5

Imprivata OneSign is preferred for seamless integration and customer support, making deployment straightforward. In comparison, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is valued for advanced security features and comprehensive logging, attracting those willing to invest in higher initial costs for long-term benefits.

Download Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Imprivata OneSign Report

Pricing

Imprivata OneSign has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiAuthenticator. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is more affordable in terms of initial setup cost.

View comparison

Pricing

Imprivata OneSign has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiAuthenticator. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is more affordable in terms of initial setup cost.

Cisco Duo

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Duo

4.4 out of 5

Imprivata OneSign offers robust single sign-on and strong authentication, making it ideal for large organizations needing comprehensive security. In comparison, Cisco Duo excels in multi-factor authentication and broad application support, providing flexibility and better ROI with accessible pricing and effective system security.

Download Cisco Duo vs. Imprivata OneSign Report

Pricing

Imprivata OneSign has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Duo, with Duo offering a more budget-friendly implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

Imprivata OneSign has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Duo, with Duo offering a more budget-friendly implementation.

Ping Identity Platform

4.1 out of 5

Ping Identity Platform

4.1 out of 5

Imprivata OneSign excels in pricing and support with efficient single sign-on and authentication management. In comparison, Ping Identity Platform offers extensive integration capabilities and strong identity governance features. Imprivata OneSign provides easier deployment, while Ping Identity Platform justifies higher costs with a broader feature range.

Download Imprivata OneSign vs. Ping Identity Platform Report

Pricing

Imprivata OneSign's setup cost is noted for its competitive pricing and straightforward installation, while Ping Identity Platform's setup cost tends to be higher with a more complex implementation. Imprivata OneSign provides affordability, contrasting Ping Identity Platform's higher in...

View comparison

Pricing

Auth0

4.2 out of 5

Auth0

4.2 out of 5

Imprivata OneSign excels in healthcare with seamless access and efficient workflows. In comparison, Auth0 offers extensive integration, multiple authentication protocols, and scalability. Imprivata OneSign is tailored for healthcare, while Auth0 provides flexibility for various industries, supporting diverse security needs and developer customization.

Download Auth0 vs. Imprivata OneSign Report

Pricing

Imprivata OneSign has a higher setup cost compared to Auth0, making it a more significant initial investment. Auth0 offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to organizations looking for lower initial costs.

View comparison

Pricing

OneLogin by One Identity

4.2 out of 5

OneLogin by One Identity

4.2 out of 5

Imprivata OneSign excels in integration and authentication in healthcare applications. In comparison, OneLogin by One Identity offers comprehensive SSO and MFA features. Tech buyers might choose Imprivata for specialized healthcare needs, while OneLogin attracts those seeking scalability and flexibility in enterprise environments.

Download Imprivata OneSign vs. OneLogin by One Identity Report

Pricing

Imprivata OneSign has a higher initial setup cost compared to OneLogin by One Identity, highlighting a substantial difference in initial investment between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Imprivata OneSign has a higher initial setup cost compared to OneLogin by One Identity, highlighting a substantial difference in initial investment between the two solutions.

Tools4ever HelloID

4.9 out of 5

Tools4ever HelloID

4.9 out of 5

Imprivata OneSign offers robust single sign-on and strong authentication, with noted room for improvement in mobile device compatibility. In comparison, Tools4ever HelloID excels in integration options and self-service functionalities, with a seamless deployment process and more cost-effective pricing attracting budget-conscious tech buyers.

Download Imprivata OneSign vs. Tools4ever HelloID Report

Pricing

Imprivata OneSign's setup cost is higher due to its comprehensive user management and access features, while Tools4ever HelloID offers lower initial costs, making it more accessible for budget-conscious organizations.

View comparison

Pricing

Evidian Enterprise SSO

1 out of 5

Evidian Enterprise SSO

1 out of 5

Evidian Enterprise SSO replaces user passwords with a single authentication such as a password, biometrics, a smartcard or a radio badge. Access is immediate, whether the applications are internal or external to the company. The result for users is simplified access to their applications – they automatically comply with the security policy. And by removing tiresome administration tasks, Evidian Enterprise SSO simplifies information system management.

View comparison

Related categories

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Authentication Systems

Identity Management (IM)