CyberArk Certificate Manager and Fortinet FortiToken compete in security solutions. CyberArk leads with advanced automation and comprehensive certificate management, while Fortinet is preferred for cost-effective multi-factor authentication.
Features: CyberArk is known for robust automation, centralizing certificate management, and enhancing operational efficiency with minimal downtime in cloud environments. Fortinet FortiToken is notable for secure multi-factor authentication, offering both soft and hard token options, and supports a broad range of devices for straightforward security integration.
Room for Improvement: CyberArk needs better automation and cloud service integration, as users report some manual processes. Fortinet FortiToken could improve by enhancing cloud integration, supporting additional protocols, and improving mobile client features, with users seeking more flexibility in multi-device scenarios.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk provides solid technical support and various deployment models, but users note a decline post-acquisition. Fortinet offers flexible deployment and effective support, though communication improvements could be beneficial, often integrating with other Fortinet solutions.
Pricing and ROI: CyberArk is more expensive but offers strong ROI with reduced outages. Fortinet FortiToken is praised for affordability in price-sensitive markets and offers a simpler pricing model, though users desire more pricing predictability.
With Venafi, it wasn't about saving time but achieving functionality that was otherwise impossible, such as distributing certificates without manual intervention.
Inquiries are typically addressed the same day, with most issues, even complex ones, resolved within 24 hours.
Venafi's technical support is excellent, with even their first-tier support being in-house and highly competent.
Their technical support is knowledgeable and helpful, making Venafi stand out among other CyberArk products.
Their resolution time is timely, and they provide solutions efficiently.
This role-based access control enhances scalability and efficiency by providing a focused view of necessary information.
Horizontal scaling is a necessity rather than vertical scaling.
Scalability with Venafi is good; you can definitely use it if you have ten thousand certs, a thousand certs, a million, or a couple million.
There is a need to scale more effectively to accommodate a larger number of users and bulk users.
Regarding Fortinet FortiToken's scalability, we can purchase licenses according to our needs.
FortiToken is scalable and accommodates the needs for updates effectively.
Venafi's stability has been consistently reliable.
Venafi is a stable product. It's definitely more stable than others.
For stability, I'd rate it around six out of ten since we experience some outages despite the investment.
FortiToken is stable, but there are some restrictions when it comes to supporting two-factor authentication in multi-factor environments.
Expanding the range of out-of-the-box integrations would significantly improve the user experience.
The yearly DNS verification required by certificate authorities necessitates manual intervention, hindering full automation.
They are pushing for cloud adoption, but we prefer on-premises solutions due to regulatory concerns.
This would allow for broader distribution among a larger number of system admins and software engineers, which is currently not feasible with the existing hardware-only approach.
If I can receive it on email, it would be more flexible.
FortiToken should provide enhanced SMS services for those users who do not have smartphones.
Venafi offers good value for the cost.
The pricing has increased for us, impacting our organization due to its operational expenditure (OPEX).
For our budget, Venafi's cost is moderate. It's not expensive as internal certificate generation is free, and we only pay for the public CA certificate signer and for storage in Venafi.
Discounts are often provided to close deals, making it a cost-effective solution.
The pricing for FortiToken is not low; I regard it as medium-priced.
The most valuable feature of Venafi is the automation that helps save time and reduce human error.
It ensures centralized certificate management, which is crucial for compliance and maintaining best practices.
What I like best about Venafi is that it's very easy to get somebody on a call and get any of my questions answered.
The main use case of FortiToken is that it is a hardware-based solution, providing secure two-factor authentication for administrators.
It is very user-friendly and easily integrates with various firewalls, making it convenient to use within diverse environments.
The solution is unique in catering to Fortinet, making it very useful and secure.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Fortinet FortiToken | 5.3% |
Venafi | 1.3% |
Other | 93.4% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 5 |
Large Enterprise | 10 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 16 |
Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
Large Enterprise | 9 |
CyberArk Certificate Manager automates and streamlines certificate processes, reducing errors and enhancing efficiency. It centralizes management, supports compliance, and improves certificate lifecycle management with customizable features.
CyberArk Certificate Manager offers a streamlined approach to managing certificates, focusing on automation that minimizes manual intervention and errors. Its discovery and centralized management enhance operational efficiency, while integration capabilities facilitate seamless handling of certificates across systems like AWS and Azure. Users benefit from its user-friendly, intuitive interface, robust reporting, and customizable notifications, which improve compliance, reduce bottlenecks, and allow for custom field creation. Though the on-premises version is mature, there is room for improvement in cloud service integration and out-of-the-box features. Additional enhancements are needed in documentation clarity, hardware security module support, and diverse scripting language support.
What are the most important features of CyberArk Certificate Manager?CyberArk Certificate Manager finds applications across multiple industries like finance and healthcare where stringent security protocols are critical. Organizations use it for server authentication and managing application IDs, ensuring compliance and preventing outages. Its integration with major cloud platforms and automation of installations across endpoints makes it an ideal choice for companies focusing on enhancing security and operational efficiency.
As we've seen, passwords alone don't keep unwanted guests out of your network. Password-only authentication has led to security breaches, malware infections, and policy violations. With two-factor authentication, a password is used along with a security token and authentication server to provide far better security. Authorized employees can remotely access company resources safely using a variety of devices, ranging from lpatops to mobile phones.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.