CyberArk Certificate Manager vs Entrust Identity Enterprise comparison

CyberArk and Entrust are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. CyberArk is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.1, while Entrust is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5. CyberArk holds a 1.3% mindshare in AS, compared to Entrust’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Entrust users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Certificate Manager

Read 15 CyberArk Certificate Manager reviews

1,209 Views
846 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Read 7 Entrust Identity Enterprise reviews

989 Views
742 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

CyberArk Certificate Manager

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2025

Entrust Identity Enterprise and CyberArk Certificate Manager compete in digital identity management and certificate lifecycle management. Entrust leads in user satisfaction due to pricing and support, while CyberArk is favored for its advanced features justifying its cost.

Features: Entrust Identity Enterprise offers versatile integration options, robust multi-factor authentication, and frictionless security enhancements. CyberArk Certificate Manager provides advanced automation in certificate lifecycle management, a comprehensive dashboard for centralized control, and platform-agnostic nature supporting multiple systems.

Room for Improvement: Entrust could enhance its automation features, improve reporting options, and expand its integration capabilities. CyberArk might streamline its setup process, improve user interface intuitiveness, and offer more cost-effective solutions for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Entrust Identity Enterprise is known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. CyberArk requires a more complex setup needing a dedicated IT team, but provides in-depth support for deployment, assisting with ongoing customization and support.

Pricing and ROI: Entrust Identity Enterprise highlights lower initial deployment costs, attractive for businesses with budget constraints. It achieves ROI through reduced IT overhead and improved security. CyberArk's higher initial investment offers a comprehensive feature set, maximizing long-term ROI through enhanced security and automation, particularly benefiting large-scale operations.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,098 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Certificate Manager

Ranking in Authentication Systems

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Certificate Management Software (2nd)

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Ranking in Authentication Systems

15th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of CyberArk Certificate Manager is 1.3%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Entrust Identity Enterprise is 1.6%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CyberArk Certificate Manager	1.3%
Entrust Identity Enterprise	1.6%
Other	97.1%

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Adam Goldstein

Systems Engineer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees

Automates certificate management across platforms and has enhanced integration support

Certificate Manager excels in automating certificate rotation and deployment but could enhance its offering by improving support for hardware security modules like Fortanix and providing more advanced, out-of-the-box integrations with public certificate authorities for DNS re-verification. Currently, the yearly DNS verification required by certificate authorities necessitates manual intervention, hindering full automation. This limitation, however, is not unique to Certificate Manager, as most tools lack the API integration necessary to automate the verification process with certificate authorities. Until such integration is achieved, the added security layer of domain verification will continue to pose a challenge for fully automated public certificate management.

Read full review

Iwegbue Godspower Isioma

Cyber Security Analyst at Platview Technologies

Provides strong authentication feature, which requires users to enter a one-time password (OTP)

The main issue I've noticed pertains to setting up the desktop client on virtual machines in Azure, GCP, or AWS, specifically for Entrust Identity Enterprise intended for on-premises use. It works for on-premises, but I'm not sure if it's fully supported in cloud environments. If support were added, it would function perfectly with on-premises configurations. So, it functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CyberArk Certificate Manager has impacted our reduction of certificate-related downtime primarily through the auto-rotation feature, as it alerts us when our certificate is going to expire, allowing us to rotate it before expiration, which avoids potential disruptions in services."

"The most important feature for us is the ease of use. If something is not available, we can develop our own scripts for it. We can create change management around this tool."

"The support is definitely great. What I like best about Venafi is that it's very easy to get somebody on a call and get any of my questions answered. That's probably the biggest thing. Besides the fact that it's a mature product and it works, the support is a big deal."

"We have reduced 80% to 90% of our outages with Venafi, which impacts the revenue substantially."

"Venafi is super stable, and we experienced no issues with its stability."

"Venafi solved the issue of many misplaced internal certificates, as we know that at one place we can get all the information, and the problem of notifications about expiring certificates is resolved, improving our overall system for Expedia."

"We use Venafi for PKI certificates."

More CyberArk Certificate Manager pros

"This solution is flexible and easy to use for our clients. We use it with different kinds of applications and integrate it with different processes."

"It is a scalable solution. You can add users and credentials without problems."

"The integration matrix of the solution is huge compared to others."

"Entrust is an enterprise account, and they have a support system. Their training is also top-notch, and they are willing to share their knowledge with their partners."

"I am impressed with Entrust because they are one of the most advanced identity access management companies. Their portfolio of products is well aligned with the CISA zero trust framework. If you compare the features of Entrust products with the CISA pillars of zero trust, you'll see that they're perfectly matched with CISA requirements."

Cons

"There are quite a few different technical aspects of Venafi that I feel they just missed out on; I'd have to look at my notes for the specifics."

"Currently lacks the capability to automatically download certificates in JKS."

"Venafi excels in automating certificate rotation and deployment but could enhance its offering by improving support for hardware security modules like Fortanix and providing more advanced, out-of-the-box integrations with public certificate authorities for DNS re-verification."

"The product was really good when it was a Venafi product. However, since its acquisition by CyberArk, there has been a lack of significant innovations. They are pushing for cloud adoption, but we prefer on-premises solutions due to regulatory concerns."

"The product was really good when it was a Venafi product. However, since its acquisition by CyberArk, there has been a lack of significant innovations."

"Venafi's overall installation could be made easier."

"An area for improvement in CyberArk Certificate Manager is that it currently does not provide an email alert. I have to log in to my dashboard and check it."

More CyberArk Certificate Manager cons

"It functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP."

"I would like to improve the tool's implementation and pricing."

"The product is very costly compared to other alternative solutions."

"We are introducing new processes and are migrating to a new version. Once we explore new functionalities, we'll be able to assess what could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Venafi's pricing appears to be competitive within the market."

"The pricing model is complex, considering factors beyond the number of certificates. This complexity can make our payments to Venafi challenging if costs continue to rise. It is good but more expensive than the competitors."

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"It's worth the money."

"The subscription could be yearly or monthly, depending upon your choice."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,098 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Performing Arts

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Venafi?

We use Venafi for PKI certificates.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Venafi?

The pricing is minimal compared to other platforms. There are no problems regarding pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Venafi?

It would be better if they could notify each member whenever any ongoing activity is happening. I have been using it for the past four years, and I haven't received any messages about issues on Cyb...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Entrust IdentityGuard?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Entrust IdentityGuard?

I use it for an extra layer of security, that is two-factor authentication (2FA).

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Entrust IdentityGuard?

I would recommend it. I've used it for three years now, and I'm very happy with it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

AppViewX CERT+ vs CyberArk Certificate Manager

Compared 30% of the time

DigiCert PKI Platform vs CyberArk Certificate Manager

Compared 24% of the time

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management vs CyberArk Certificate Manager

Compared 15% of the time

Axiad Conductor vs CyberArk Certificate Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Certificate Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More CyberArk Certificate Manager Competitors

Utimaco SecurityServer vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

DigiCert PKI Platform vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Entrust Identity Essentials vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

More Entrust Identity Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Certificate Manager

October 2025

Download CyberArk Certificate Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise

October 2025

Download Entrust Identity Enterprise product report

Also Known As

Venafi

IdentityGuard

Overview

CyberArk Certificate Manager automates and streamlines certificate processes, reducing errors and enhancing efficiency. It centralizes management, supports compliance, and improves certificate lifecycle management with customizable features.

CyberArk Certificate Manager offers a streamlined approach to managing certificates, focusing on automation that minimizes manual intervention and errors. Its discovery and centralized management enhance operational efficiency, while integration capabilities facilitate seamless handling of certificates across systems like AWS and Azure. Users benefit from its user-friendly, intuitive interface, robust reporting, and customizable notifications, which improve compliance, reduce bottlenecks, and allow for custom field creation. Though the on-premises version is mature, there is room for improvement in cloud service integration and out-of-the-box features. Additional enhancements are needed in documentation clarity, hardware security module support, and diverse scripting language support.

What are the most important features of CyberArk Certificate Manager?

Automation: Streamlines certificate processes to reduce errors and manual intervention.
Centralized Management: Consolidates certificate handling for enhanced efficiency.
Integration Capabilities: Facilitates integration with platforms like AWS and Azure.
Customizable Notifications: Tailors notifications for compliance and operational efficiency.
Robust Reporting: Provides detailed insights into certificate statuses.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Error Reduction: Minimized manual errors due to automated processes.
Enhanced Security: Centralized management improves security and governance.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines management to reduce bottlenecks.
Compliance Support: Integrates processes that ensure regulatory compliance.

CyberArk Certificate Manager finds applications across multiple industries like finance and healthcare where stringent security protocols are critical. Organizations use it for server authentication and managing application IDs, ensuring compliance and preventing outages. Its integration with major cloud platforms and automation of installations across endpoints makes it an ideal choice for companies focusing on enhancing security and operational efficiency.

CyberArk

Identity Enterprise is an integrated IAM platform that supports a full suite of workforce, consumer, and citizen use cases. Ideally suited for high-assurance applications that require a Zero Trust approach for thousands or millions of users, Identity Enterprise can be deployed on-premises.

Entrust

Sample Customers

Surescripts, CME Group, TD Bank Group, Aetna, MoneyGram, Zions Bancorp, Cisco

Bank of New Zealand, CRISIL, Banco Mercantil, G_teborg University, Ministry of Economic Development of New Zealand, Ocean Systems, Skanska, Societe Generale, Susquehanna Bancshares

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise

September 2025

Free Report: CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,098 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.