Cisco UCS Manager vs ITRS Geneos comparison

Cisco and ITRS are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.7, while ITRS is ranked #46 with an average rating of 6.5. Cisco holds a 1.4% mindshare in IM, compared to ITRS’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Manager

Read 27 Cisco UCS Manager reviews

1,680 Views
154 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

2,061 Views
209 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Manager

ITRS Geneos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ITRS Geneos and Cisco UCS Manager compete in the IT management category, focusing on monitoring and infrastructure management respectively. ITRS Geneos has the upper hand in environments requiring detailed application monitoring due to its real-time capabilities and extensive plug-in support for the financial industry, while Cisco UCS Manager excels in managing hardware integrated with Cisco infrastructure.

Features: ITRS Geneos offers real-time monitoring, making it ideal for financial institutions needing low latency. It supports multiple technologies and provides a wide range of plug-ins, particularly useful in financial sectors. Its capability to automate incident management enhances its versatility. Cisco UCS Manager focuses on managing network, computing, and storage resources. It integrates well with Cisco’s broader infrastructure solutions, providing robust management for hardware resources.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest ITRS Geneos needs enhancements in historical data reporting and data visualization. Better middleware integration and a more intuitive dashboard setup could improve its functionality. Cisco UCS Manager's complexity and user-friendliness are points for improvement, along with better alerting mechanisms for performance issues. It also requires more streamlined integration with other solutions and simplified configuration and administration processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both ITRS Geneos and Cisco UCS Manager are mainly deployed on-premises, with ITRS Geneos also offering public cloud options. ITRS Geneos is known for its highly responsive technical support and customer service, often recognized as top-notch. Cisco UCS Manager receives positive feedback for customer service and support; however, its deployment and management complexity could be challenging for smaller organizations lacking technical expertise.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos is viewed as expensive, but users justify the cost due to its extensive monitoring capabilities that reduce incident frequency. It provides high ROI by improving system stability and aiding compliance in financial sectors. Cisco UCS Manager is also seen as expensive; it offers good value when considering hardware integration and reliability compared to other vendors. However, its licensing methods may lead to higher costs, particularly for larger deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Manager vs. ITRS Geneos Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. ITRS Geneos

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Manager

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

46th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (35th), Network Monitoring Software (67th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Edwin Mwosa

IT Infrastructure Manager at KTDA

Enhanced network oversight with rapid issue identification and good efficiency

We mainly use Cisco UCS Manager to integrate and manage our Cisco switches across the building. We also utilize it for network integration. It provides an integrated solution for our Cisco environment, streamlining our operations and managing multiple Cisco devices like switches and routers Cisco…

Read full review

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can configure the Cisco UCS Manager, the profiles and interactions with the resource we manage."

"It is more robust than other solutions. So, the stability is good."

"The hardware is very powerful and it is a stable solution."

"I can deploy something in my 50-odd servers all in one go, in parallel, whereas if I was to do that individually, it could be a nightmare."

"One of the valuable features is the user interface base."

"Ease of management is certainly the most valuable feature in this product."

"Cisco UCS has different layers of security, and you can do multiple installations of your LIAMs on top of the server and Blade. You can install VMware, Windows Server, Hyper-V, etc."

"Cisco UCS Manager is overall a good package because it gives a GUI interface and a CLI."

More Cisco UCS Manager pros

"The built-in plug-ins allow administrators to easily configure monitoring components for market data systems such as Thomson Reuters Enterprise Platform and SRLabs Wombat (formerly NYSE)."

"Tons of default modules which are available out of the box"

"Ability to monitor logs for potential issues to prevent app outages before problems get a chance to arise. That's invaluable for our teams in a fast-paced trading environment."

"I always appreciate Geneos's stability and ease of use."

"The flexibility of the product is most valuable. It is highly customizable. If you put your mind to it and think of something you could do, there's a good possibility you can get it integrated within the console, if it's not readily available. The simplicity or ease of customization has been valuable."

"One of the best aspects of Geneos is that it has a broad scope and can cover a lot of use cases. You can write your own scripts to monitor really specific things. And the rules that you can put in place can be quite complex for the alerts."

"The remarkable feature of Geneos is the dashboard. Geneos' flexible dashboard sets it apart from other monitoring tools. Other solutions have limitations in their dashboard design and can't be customized as much. The Geneos dashboard allows unlimited creativity."

"The filtering in the Active Console is exceptional. Depending on the user base, some people don't want to see server-level errors, so we have filters set up in the Managed Entities view, which allow us to filter out things that certain groups don't want to see, while allowing them to see other things. It's a great real-time monitoring solution. And you can draw graphs immediately, right from the Active Console, whether they're current graphs or historical graphs."

More ITRS Geneos pros

Cons

"The pricing aspect should be addressed."

"The integration with other solutions could be better. I think Cisco can only integrate using Intersight. There is a second interface available as a SaaS platform, in the cloud, or on-premise. It's based on the Redfish protocol, which is standard for all the B-series servers in the market. We can integrate other solutions using API."

"I would like to see Cisco UCS optionally work as a hyper-converged system because right now, it only operates as a converged system."

"The interface and the way it is constructed is very complex. They should work to simplify it. It's quite difficult for somebody who doesn't know the product very well. Users should be able to get proficient with it faster. There's definitely room for improvement there."

"I would like to see improved visibility into the operating system, enabling us to identify issues directly from the operating system itself."

"I want to be able to schedule multiple sequential updates in one go."

"In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to their security."

"We have three data centers and if we could manage all three data centers using one interface, it would be great."

More Cisco UCS Manager cons

"Much of the reporting outside of the user interface is very basic and requires much customization to be useful."

"The deployment method for upgrading is a bit tricky. It takes a little bit of manual effort. If that could be a bit more automated, it would help us a lot."

"There is one drawback to using lightweight data collection: we lack the feature of observability based on time series, such as historical model data. This makes it difficult to view data in ITRS. ITRS needs to improve this feature."

"I would also like to see suggested guidelines to accomplish a monitoring task. The issue is that ITRS is so flexible that there is more than one way to complete a task, each with benefits and disadvantages."

"ITRS Geneos cloud monitoring is very weak and can use improvement."

"There is a part of the rules for monitoring alerts. I want to understand more about how to choose the samples and the requirements for the rules. That is the part that I want to understand better and get better training for."

"I would like better access to the data that is being collected."

"We all look at the same things - CPU, disk space, paging stats, service status with RAG status on each. That could be provided straight out, saving significant time."

More ITRS Geneos cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."

"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."

"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."

"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."

"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."

"The product is priced quite high. There are pricing options for customers based on the size of the environment and plug-ins used by the monitoring system."

"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."

"Given our spend and the amount of service we have in it, the pricing is quite reasonable."

"ITRS Geneos is not a cheap tool. It's a moderate price for the banking industry. The reason we are not able to add the ITRS monitoring tool for the non-banking industries, and non-finance industries, is that the pricing is too high."

"Its price is reasonable. It isn't too expensive, and it isn't too cheap, but it also depends on a company's volume and negotiation."

"The market tools are on par with this solution, but if the solution included more features, then it would be well within the range for the cost."

"It is expensive. They have to look at the model around when we move to cloud and how that's going to work. The licensing cost does pay off because of the improvements in support to our business."

"The pricing is fairly market-related. They have been very lenient because we have been working with them for so long. An example is that we're currently migrating some of our services to AWS, and they've given us a grace period for some of the things to help with the migration and not to grow additional costs while we are migrating, but it's still on par with the market."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

74%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?

When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?

My experience with the pricing of Cisco UCS Manager ( /products/cisco-ucs-manager-reviews ) is that it is reasonable. Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?

For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks. While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the...

See all answers

What do you like most about ITRS Geneos?

I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 83% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 9% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 22% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 15% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 14% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager

June 2025

Download Cisco UCS Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

June 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Also Known As

No data available

Geneos

Overview

Cisco UCS Manager helps significantly reduce management and administration expenses by automating routine tasks to increase operational agility. Customers can extend the benefits of Cisco UCS Manager globally across an enterprise to thousands of servers in multiple domains with Cisco UCS Central Software.

Cisco

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Sample Customers

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. ITRS Geneos

June 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS Manager vs. ITRS Geneos

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Manager vs. ITRS Geneos and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Manager vs. ITRS Geneos report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.