Cisco UCS Manager vs HPE OneView comparison

Cisco and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.7, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.2. Cisco holds a 1.4% mindshare in IM, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Manager

Read 27 Cisco UCS Manager reviews

1,680 Views
153 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

HPE OneView

Read 83 HPE OneView reviews

2,130 Views
533 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Manager

HPE OneView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

HPE OneView and Cisco UCS Manager are powerful data center management solutions. HPE OneView appears to have an advantage with its focus on automation and simplicity, effectively reducing complexity and enhancing time efficiency, which is evident through positive user feedback.

Features: HPE OneView is recognized for its automation capabilities, unifying diverse IT environments for seamless management, and providing comprehensive health control and reporting. Cisco UCS Manager is noted for flexible management, efficient hardware management, and quick server deployment through service profiles, though it lacks a performance dashboard.

Room for Improvement: HPE OneView could improve with better customization, cloud integration, faster profile deployment, and advanced reporting. Cisco UCS Manager might benefit from simplifying the deployment process, more intuitive UIs, and better third-party integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both systems are mainly used in on-premises environments, with HPE also supporting hybrid clouds. Users report varied experiences with technical support; HPE is praised for fast initial response but sometimes inconsistent follow-ups, while Cisco is generally reliable. Deployment is straightforward for both, but Cisco may require expertise.

Pricing and ROI: HPE OneView offers competitive, sometimes free pricing under certain conditions, yet seen as high in licensing costs, with positive ROI due to reduced configuration times. Cisco UCS Manager is considered costly but justified by its robust features and performance, often included with hardware purchases, offering a substantial return on investment despite expensive maintenance.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Manager vs. HPE OneView Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. HPE OneView

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Manager

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE OneView

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.4%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Edwin Mwosa

IT Infrastructure Manager at KTDA

Enhanced network oversight with rapid issue identification and good efficiency

We mainly use Cisco UCS Manager to integrate and manage our Cisco switches across the building. We also utilize it for network integration. It provides an integrated solution for our Cisco environment, streamlining our operations and managing multiple Cisco devices like switches and routers Cisco…

Read full review

Trevor Watkins

Server Applications Senior Administrator at Home Hardware Stores Limited

Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO

I've been involved in various upgrades. It's pretty easy to set up with vCenter. We just push out an appliance template in vCenter. We run ours on virtual servers. Deployment can be done by just one person. The number of people needed for maintenance will depend on your server inventory. If you have more than 100 servers, you will need three to five people. If you have 500 to 1,000 servers, you will need a team of 10 to 20 people.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can deploy something in my 50-odd servers all in one go, in parallel, whereas if I was to do that individually, it could be a nightmare."

"The reporting functionality will give you any report you want."

"For the blade architecture and ease of use, I consider Cisco UCS Manager the best option on the market at the moment."

"Cisco UCS has different layers of security, and you can do multiple installations of your LIAMs on top of the server and Blade. You can install VMware, Windows Server, Hyper-V, etc."

"When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time."

"The solution is highly scalable, mainly because of the templates that make it easy for you to actually edit on the system."

"The hardware is very powerful and it is a stable solution."

"Cisco UCS Manager is recommended for its ease of deployment and management capabilities."

More Cisco UCS Manager pros

"Easy to add servers and get them monitored and manageable."

"We get templates, so it's speed to delivery for us. It's a big difference with the template features."

"It is very stable. We have had no downtime nor issues in approximately a year. "

"We have the dashboard up on a big screen, and you can actually see when things go wrong or if there are any faults with any of the servers. The backup is automated as well, so the appliance is quite good."

"The solution's initial setup process was easy...The technical support is good...It is a stable product, and we will use it for a long time."

"The easy user interface was what I found most valuable in HPE OneView. For example, if I wanted to know the infrastructure status or I needed to send in any change commands, HPE OneView had simple buttons."

"I don't have to use CD-ROMs or anything like that to provision the servers."

"The remote support automatically logs service calls and support cases with HPE, which is really good."

More HPE OneView pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the software part of Cisco UCS Manager. It should be more user-friendly, especially when creating policies."

"I want to be able to schedule multiple sequential updates in one go."

"The primary challenge we face is identifying the correct version to deploy during firmware upgrades or compute updates."

"Cisco UCS Manager should have a simplified deployment in the sense of not having multiple machines, demilitarized zones, and on-premise options."

"Getting a CLI report on routers, switches, or any other CLI configuration device is difficult."

"Some settings are still fairly well hidden, even the basic ones."

"Its user interface can be improved. It can be more user-friendly."

"Upgrading the firmware is a difficult procedure."

More Cisco UCS Manager cons

"I believe the prices of HPE OneView should be reduced, as it is quite expensive."

"They can improve reporting and provide more customized reports. Currently, reporting is a bit limited. It can be complex to learn and manage for beginners. Because of my experience, I find it comfortable to manage, which might not be the case with beginners. It would be good if they can make it a little bit easier to understand. They can provide a more graphical view of connectivity and other things. Their technical support can also be improved."

"The speed and performance of the solution are areas where the product lacks and needs improvement."

"We've had issues, for example, with RAM."

"Those features, coming in version 4, that we're looking for are the discovery, primarily. But I think the scope-based access control is of interest, although, we didn't see any directory integration, so that, in itself, seems like it's still limited."

"The solution's console can be improved by making it more user-friendly and adding the capability to filter the reports out using only the information required."

"Use it, but do not think it is going into the clouds, because it is not. There is room for improvement."

"We have a version 3 and a version 1.2, but the upgrade process from the 1.2 to the 3 is kind of an issue."

More HPE OneView cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."

"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."

"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."

"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."

"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."

"Synergy does not require iLO licenses but servers and enclosures must be purchased."

"The solution is free to use, but if you want the management aspect you require a virtual machine such as C7000 or Synergy which require licenses."

"I am happy with the price."

"I feel the product's price falls a bit on the higher side."

"I would rate the cost as six out of ten."

"When it comes to the government, money is never an issue, so it was excellent in terms of the HPE OneView licensing cost. Hitachi was cheaper, but I'd rate HPE OneView cost-wise as eight out of ten."

"Use it. It is free."

"HPE had some other solutions, but they were actually quite expensive to buy. So, when OneView came along, it was kind of reasonable in terms of price for licenses, etc."

More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

25%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?

When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?

My experience with the pricing of Cisco UCS Manager ( /products/cisco-ucs-manager-reviews ) is that it is reasonable. Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?

For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks. While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE OneView?

The most valuable features of HPE OneView are environment monitoring, the ease of firmware upgrade, and the ability to manage all the servers and the infrastructure from one team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE OneView?

My main complaint is about the blades on the frames, which seem to have a lot of problems. We often have to call HPE for replacements, such as for memory. Constant issues arise, leading to frequent...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?

We use HPE OneView ( /products/hpe-oneview-reviews ) to manage our Synergy frames. We have multiple OneView environments, and we manage a lot of Synergy 12,000 series frames with Synergy 480 Gen10 ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 83% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView

Compared 12% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator vs HPE OneView

Compared 12% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE OneView

Compared 11% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs HPE OneView

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE OneView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager

June 2025

Download Cisco UCS Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView

June 2025

Download HPE OneView product report

Also Known As

No data available

HP OneView

Overview

Cisco UCS Manager helps significantly reduce management and administration expenses by automating routine tasks to increase operational agility. Customers can extend the benefits of Cisco UCS Manager globally across an enterprise to thousands of servers in multiple domains with Cisco UCS Central Software.

Cisco

HPE OneView is your infrastructure automation engine to simplify operations, increasing the speed of IT delivery for new applications and services. Through software defined intelligence, HPE OneView brings a new level of automation to infrastructure management by taking a template driven approach to provisioning, updating, and integrating compute, storage, and networking infrastructure. Designed with a modern, standard-based API and supported by a large and growing partner ecosystem, HPE OneView also makes it easy to integrate powerful infrastructure automation into existing IT tools and processes. Take command with HPE OneView to deploy infrastructure faster, simplify operations and increase productivity.

HPE OneView innovations provide you the industry’s best infrastructure management experience, simplifying operations for HPE BladeSystem, HPE ProLiant servers, 3PAR storage, HPE Networking and HPE ConvergedSystems.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. HPE OneView

June 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS Manager vs. HPE OneView

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Manager vs. HPE OneView and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Manager vs. HPE OneView report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.