Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft BitLocker comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

Endpoint Encryption Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade2.5%
Microsoft BitLocker35.3%
ESET Endpoint Encryption17.3%
Other44.900000000000006%
Endpoint Encryption
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention1.0%
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention13.0%
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention9.0%
Other77.0%
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
Endpoint Encryption Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft BitLocker35.3%
ESET Endpoint Encryption17.3%
Symantec Endpoint Encryption9.4%
Other38.00000000000001%
Endpoint Encryption
 

Featured Reviews

AshleyMorales - PeerSpot reviewer
Centralized management with full disk encryption and helpful authentification capabilities
They should improve the interface and make it a little more user-friendly. They should also improve performance in encrypting and decrypting data more efficiently. A lot of machine resources are consumed; they should improve the audit area of the tool and make it more It is also efficient to add some type of remote access functionality for data recovery or integration with policy management tools. They must improve support and customer service, which is one of the factors where they have been failing the most in recent years.
VivekGupta7 - PeerSpot reviewer
Versatile with good patching and a straightforward setup
There is some fine-tuning needed, even once you define something. We need to do a lot of configuration. It would be easier if they made the configuration simpler, especially in the beginning. They need to give the user more choices and provide more guidance to help avoid problems later on. We'd like some more built-in predictive analytics so we can be prepared for what might happen in the future. We did have some bandwidth issues during setup. If your update fails, you may have stability issues. We find it difficult to reach higher levels of support when we face larger issues.
Ibrahin Gamal - PeerSpot reviewer
Data protection improves while users adapt to user access complexities
Recovery options are useful with Microsoft BitLocker. When we get the recovery key from Microsoft, people who we show how BitLocker works did not know the facts about BitLocker. When we tell them about recovery keys, it is very difficult for them to get to the users who have issues in their PCs and do not have the knowledge. When IT asked about the scenario, it was difficult for them. They needed something where they could go to the administration portal to unlock the PC for the user, but we tell them that when a user asks for a recovery key, it consists of 32 numbers to unlock their PC. They observed cost savings after implementing Microsoft BitLocker because they requested BitLocker with System Center. They found that it did not have a high cost, as it is a built-in feature in Windows. When they asked about other solutions, it was very expensive for large numbers in other corporates or organizations. They were very satisfied with Microsoft BitLocker with System Center Configuration Manager.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The encryption ensures each of our drives is not invasive and that the user does not have a bad experience even while the drive is being encrypted."
"It is a cross-platform tool."
"It's easily scalable and adaptable to the needs of the business."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is hard disk protection."
"This encryption is relatively fast and really covers the needs required."
"The product's initial setup phase is totally fine."
"It keeps the devices well monitored."
"This software has helped individuals in the organization avoid data loss."
"The most valuable feature right now is the user control."
"Everything in this DLP is great. It"
"The most valuable feature is strong data leak prevention for data protection."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to control access to USB drives and other external devices."
"The solution is very user-friendly and valuable."
"The most valuable feature of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is data loss prevention."
"The stability of the solution can be good. However, the configuration takes a long time for it to be done properly."
"The overall features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention are very good."
"We have not seen any bugs or glitches, so the stability is good."
"The best thing about it is the encryption type and the way it requires TPM when someone tries to access the drive."
"Microsoft BitLocker's most valuable features are stability and simplicity in terms of usage."
"The product is stable."
"The most valuable feature is the simplicity and integration with the Microsoft Clouds platform."
"Microsoft BitLocker can be used to ensure that stolen PCs or laptops do not lose their data."
"It's very straightforward to recover data. It's safe for us; in case of lost information, it provides multiple options to recover the data."
"They observed cost savings after implementing Microsoft BitLocker because they requested BitLocker with System Center."
 

Cons

"They should improve the interface and make it a little more user-friendly."
"You do need to be careful that you don't mess too much with the endpoint, or you might have issues with the work stations."
"I rate the support from Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade a six out of ten."
"They could improve the latency in the platform when entering the portal."
"The response time for technical support could be faster."
"While the solution works as it should, it is overly expensive."
"The price is high for small scale business enterprises."
"I would like to bring centralized management to mobile devices."
"There are a lot of vulnerabilities and viruses and malware can proliferate."
"The user interface is messy and could be simplified."
"The support from McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is good. However, if they provided 24 hours a day seven days a week support that would be a helpful addition."
"The solution takes up too much CPU and memory."
"We faced many issues with the solution's customer support, and it should be made customer-friendly and more responsive."
"Lacks GDPR regulations to enhance security."
"The licensing cost for McAfee Total Protection could be cheaper, but apart from that, I don't need anything else. The software has what I need."
"The interface can be improved, it's too cluttered."
"The product must improve the centralization of keys."
"The encryption takes a long time to complete, and our system runs very slowly while it is encrypting."
"Instead of integrating with a third party, Microsoft BitLocker should have its own mechanism to safeguard the systems when they are not accessible for a long time."
"The solution should offer encryption for other items such as shared folders, removable media, etc."
"If the encryption was faster then it would make the experience more pleasant."
"User profiles can be improved so that people can create their own passwords. It has one password per machine, which is a problem. We would prefer each user to have his or her own boot password. Each user can have a username and password or biometrics, such as fingerprints and iris scanner, integrated into the boot process, but I really can't see that coming anytime soon, if ever."
"There is room for improvement in stability."
"BitLocker should be available on standard Windows. We need to spend money on a Pro license to get BitLocker because it's essential to protect our customers' data. We don't want that to fall into the wrong hands."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As it costs $125 per workstation per year, something which is above the price of what the competition is charging, the solution is definitely too expensive."
"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."
"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is an expensive solution."
"There is an annual license to use this solution."
"The pricing seems expensive both for the license and the support."
"If the client purchases the entire suite of McAfee Endpoint, the license is included."
"I'm paying the license for McAfee Total Protection yearly. It could be cheaper, but it's fine."
"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive."
"The price of the solution could improve, it is expensive. We typically sell one and three-year licenses."
"It is free. It is enabled as part of the operating system. Once you have an operating system license, you're licensed for Bitlocker."
"For reasons unknown, Microsoft products seem to be getting more expensive."
"It operates on a subscription model on an annual basis."
"We can activate the product at no cost."
"The cost of this solution is bundled in with part of the subscription for the Microsoft Cloud. We have users subscribed to Enterprise E5 and it comes with E5"
"This solution is included with Microsoft Server and my clients did not have to pay for anything extra."
"Microsoft BitLocker's pricing is fair; I rate it a four out of ten."
"The solution is priced low. I would rate the product's pricing one out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.
866,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Security Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Healthcare Company
8%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Retailer
9%
Non Profit
6%
Government
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business35
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise25
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?
The cost of licenses depends on the characteristics or implementation you are looking for.
What needs improvement with Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?
I once faced a problem with the tool, but I remember that I managed to work without a VPN, and then the problem with ...
What do you like most about McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?
The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal conf...
What should one take into account when replacing PGP with Microsoft BitLocker?
Beware to make backup of useful data, then use reverse decryption policy from Symantec panel/McAfee ePO to decrypt th...
Would you choose Microsoft BitLocker or McAfee Complete Data Protection?
Microsoft BitLocker is very intuitive and easy to maintain. It is basically the global standard solution for drive en...
How does Microsoft BitLocker compare with Symantec Endpoint Encryption?
Microsoft BitLocker is very intuitive and easy to maintain. It is basically the global standard solution for drive en...
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee Total Protection for Data, McAfee Total Protection for DLP, Total Protection for Data, Intel Security Total Protection for Data
BitLocker, MS BitLocker
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
Kleberg Bank
ACV, Proaxis Therapy, Choice Hotels International, adnymics GmbH, Intermedia, NMBS/SNCB
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Sophos, ESET and others in Endpoint Encryption. Updated: August 2025.
866,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.