Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs WinMagic SecureDoc comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and WinMagic are both solutions in the Endpoint Encryption category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0, while WinMagic is ranked #10. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 2.7% mindshare in EE, compared to WinMagic’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WinMagic users who would recommend it.

Check Point Full Disk Encry...

Read 16 Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade reviews

432 Views
367 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WinMagic SecureDoc

Read 2 WinMagic SecureDoc reviews

455 Views
423 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point Full Disk Encry...

WinMagic SecureDoc

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

WinMagic SecureDoc and Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade are key players in data security. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade appears to have the upper hand due to superior security integrations and seamless performance.

Features: WinMagic SecureDoc provides extensive encryption across platforms, centralized management, and peripheral control for versatile data protection. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade offers advanced integration capabilities, superior encryption standards, and threat prevention mechanisms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WinMagic SecureDoc ensures a straightforward deployment with comprehensive documentation and responsive support. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade presents a more complex deployment offset by solid technical support and structured onboarding.

Pricing and ROI: WinMagic SecureDoc is known for competitive pricing, offering favorable ROI with cost-effective solutions. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade, despite higher setup costs, promises ROI through its extensive security features and integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Encryption Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Encryption

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Full Disk Encry...

Ranking in Endpoint Encryption

7th

Ranking in Mobile Data Protection

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WinMagic SecureDoc

Ranking in Endpoint Encryption

10th

Ranking in Mobile Data Protection

6th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Endpoint Encryption category, the mindshare of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is 2.7%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WinMagic SecureDoc is 3.8%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Encryption Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade	2.7%
WinMagic SecureDoc	3.8%
Other	93.5%

Endpoint Encryption

Featured Reviews

AshleyMorales

Cloud computing at ITQS

Centralized management with full disk encryption and helpful authentification capabilities

They should improve the interface and make it a little more user-friendly. They should also improve performance in encrypting and decrypting data more efficiently. A lot of machine resources are consumed; they should improve the audit area of the tool and make it more It is also efficient to add some type of remote access functionality for data recovery or integration with policy management tools. They must improve support and customer service, which is one of the factors where they have been failing the most in recent years.

Read full review

it_user774159

System Administrator at Five9

Provides DLP and security of all company data on workstations, however we had issues with deployment on legacy-formatted drives

The Central Management server Provides DLP and security of all company data on workstations. MacOS X is missing features. OS X High Sierra is still not supported. 11 months. We had issues with deployment on legacy-formatted drives so make sure you know how your drives are formatted. The…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It keeps the devices well monitored."

"Encryption prevents data loss which can cost the organization a lot of resources."

"The product's initial setup phase is totally fine."

"Its ability to provide a security layer of encryption that allows us to prevent unauthorized access to computers."

"It's easily scalable and adaptable to the needs of the business."

"The initial setup is easy."

"They have Disc Encryption, Anti-Malware, and a VPN Blade which is beneficial for us."

"It is a cross-platform tool."

More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade pros

"The Central Management server."

Cons

"Regarding the general topic of support, many have annoyances with it."

"There are a few cases of security breaches when the networking system fails and can lead to malware attacks. The next release should focus more on data virtualization and support for all computing devices."

"They could improve the latency in the platform when entering the portal."

"The cost of maintaining the system is high for personal use."

"The encryption is fast; however, when it comes to generating decryption of the OS disks, it is sometimes very slow, generating a loss of time."

"Sometimes the performance rates are not consistent."

"When I changed the way I connect to the tool to the SMS option, I did it because I bought a new phone, and it had a problem connecting with the tool, after which I had to go to the settings to change it, so I felt it was not very intuitive."

"In the future, I would like to see is the ability to decrypt equipment."

More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade cons

"MacOS X is missing features."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As it costs $125 per workstation per year, something which is above the price of what the competition is charging, the solution is definitely too expensive."

"Licensing and pricing is on par with the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Government

16%

Healthcare Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?

It is a cross-platform tool.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?

The cost of licenses depends on the characteristics or implementation you are looking for.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?

I once faced a problem with the tool, but I remember that I managed to work without a VPN, and then the problem with the product was sorted out somehow. An option to connect not only with the usern...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft BitLocker vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

Compared 67% of the time

McAfee Complete Data Protection vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

Compared 33% of the time

More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade Competitors

Microsoft BitLocker vs WinMagic SecureDoc

Compared 83% of the time

ESET Endpoint Encryption vs WinMagic SecureDoc

Compared 18% of the time

More WinMagic SecureDoc Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

October 2025

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade report

Download Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Encryption

October 2025

Download WinMagic SecureDoc product report

Also Known As

No data available

SecureDoc

Overview

The Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade provides automatic security for all information on endpoint hard drives, including user data, operating system files and temporary and erased files. For maximum data protection, multi-factor pre-boot authentication ensures user identity, while encryption prevents data loss from theft.
Learn more about Full disk encryption.

Check Point Software Technologies

SecureDoc is used by some of the world's largest organizations. By simplifying data security we can help save time and reduce costs associated with security management. At the end of the day, we make data security easy.

WinMagic

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)

NEC Group,Export Development Canada, SecureDoc University of Guelph, Swiss Bank, Suva (Swiss Accident Insurance), Money Partners (UK), Children's Hospital of Denver, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Arch Chemicals

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Sophos, ESET and others in Endpoint Encryption. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors and best Mobile Data Protection vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.