No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs McAfee Complete Data Protection comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Full Disk Encry...
Ranking in Endpoint Encryption
7th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Data Protection (4th)
McAfee Complete Data Protec...
Ranking in Endpoint Encryption
5th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Endpoint Encryption category, the mindshare of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is 4.9%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of McAfee Complete Data Protection is 6.2%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Encryption Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
McAfee Complete Data Protection6.2%
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade4.9%
Other88.9%
Endpoint Encryption
 

Featured Reviews

Danit Sannikov - PeerSpot reviewer
Project manager at SII
Can be well-integrated with the existing systems in a company and is very intuitive to use
I once faced a problem with the tool, but I remember that I managed to work without a VPN, and then the problem with the product was sorted out somehow. An option to connect not only with the username and password but also through SMS in an easy manner is something that needs to be added to the tool. When I changed the way I connect to the tool to the SMS option, I did it because I bought a new phone, and it had a problem connecting with the tool, after which I had to go to the settings to change it, so I felt it was not very intuitive. In other platforms, the user will have two options to connect, one of which is with a username and password, and the other one is with an SMS.
reviewer2083461 - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Security Analyst at a real estate/law firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Secures data loss for our law firm but has struggled with outdated, complex management
On a technical level, when I draw a comparison between McAfee Complete Data Protection and CrowdStrike, McAfee Complete Data Protection is a one out of ten, and then CrowdStrike is a ten out of ten. I say that technically McAfee Complete Data Protection is so low because the console and the portal haven't changed in almost ten years. It's had some slight visual improvements, but that's it. It's not really working in a modern portal the way that some of the enterprise apps like CrowdStrike actually work. McAfee Complete Data Protection is also very difficult to use. It takes a lot of time to get my head around how it actually operates. It's not very intuitive. However, in terms of pricing and the specific use cases that I have, it's good.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Above all, the possibility of keeping our data safe by placing a unique digital signature for each device we will encrypt, informing us of any unauthorized changes, is one of the most valuable features."
"The solution provides complete security for one's workstation."
"The solution is pretty reliable."
"It's easily scalable and adaptable to the needs of the business."
"It keeps the devices well monitored."
"This software has helped individuals in the organization avoid data loss."
"The product's initial setup phase is totally fine."
"It is a cross-platform tool."
"It is capable of acting as Web control, Device Control, or Data Control."
"Technical support is very helpful."
"I got two products in one solution, so it is very efficient."
"The most valuable feature is security."
"The beauty of McAfee is that they are not looking at encryption from one single standpoint. It is a broader solution."
"It is part of the DLP and works well for that use case."
"Complete Data Protection lets us define roles in our data products. It helps us identify something suspicious on the client's device."
"I don't need to have any interaction with this product, which means that it is very, very good, and it is doing its job."
 

Cons

"I rate the support from Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade a six out of ten."
"In the future, I would like to see is the ability to decrypt equipment."
"Regarding the general topic of support, many have annoyances with it."
"The tool should be able to recover data from a stolen device."
"The cost of maintaining the system is high for personal use."
"When I changed the way I connect to the tool to the SMS option, I did it because I bought a new phone, and it had a problem connecting with the tool, after which I had to go to the settings to change it, so I felt it was not very intuitive."
"You do need to be careful that you don't mess too much with the endpoint, or you might have issues with the work stations."
"They should improve the interface and make it a little more user-friendly."
"The solution's pricing could be better."
"It is difficult to manage."
"There is a feature called manual classification that is not intuitive to use and can be improved."
"There's a limited coverage of operating systems. The marketing strategies need to change drastically."
"There are compatibility issues with the Chrome browser."
"The price could be improved."
"The solution needs to reduce the number of false positives. There are too many of them."
"The solution needs more advanced features."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As it costs $125 per workstation per year, something which is above the price of what the competition is charging, the solution is definitely too expensive."
"The pricing is quite reasonable compared to other vendors."
"The cost of McAfee Complete Data Protection isn't that high but isn't that cheap as well, so it's in the middle."
"The price is good, it's a low-cost solution."
"I think the price could be a little bit less."
"The pricing is better than that of some competing products."
"The licensing is yearly."
"The solution is more expensive than one of its competitors."
"The pricing of the cloud offering seems confusing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.
903,996 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
16%
Healthcare Company
10%
Construction Company
10%
University
9%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Construction Company
9%
Educational Organization
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business18
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Would you choose Microsoft BitLocker or McAfee Complete Data Protection?
Microsoft BitLocker is very intuitive and easy to maintain. It is basically the global standard solution for drive encryption and successfully fulfills regulatory needs in terms of data protection....
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Complete Data Protection?
I am not very clear on whether McAfee Complete Data Protection is expensive or if it could be cheaper.
What needs improvement with McAfee Complete Data Protection?
The changes I would suggest for McAfee Complete Data Protection involve its global control capability. I am used to a comprehensive solution that extends beyond just branch or local office operations.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
Xcel Energy
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. McAfee Complete Data Protection and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
903,996 professionals have used our research since 2012.