We performed a comparison between McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention and Trellix DLP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I am impressed with the tool's firewalls and web protection."
"The most valuable feature right now is the user control."
"You can manage your compliance in line with legislation such as GDPR and POPIA."
"The interface showcases threat incidents very well."
"The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal confidential information from endpoints."
"This solution has a rich set of policies."
"The most valuable features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention are the DLP. The DLP, data loss prevention is the most important feature right now that users are looking for."
"The initial setup process was easy."
More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Pros →
"It prevents enterprises from installing external software and devices and can block specific network pathways."
"Trellix can transfer the data through the cloud. The storage device control is an important feature."
"Scalability is feasible since it's on-premises. It's easy to scale there."
"The tool has prebuilt templates for data classification. It is easier for customers to get started."
"It could improve how it deals with solar data."
"Technical support doesn't really offer fast response times."
"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention needs to improve the resources it uses for CPU and RAM."
"In my experience, it's not really user-friendly for me, in terms of how I navigate with the ePolicy Orchestrator. They need to upgrade their management console."
"There needs to be support for blocking the sending of files by email because even if you block or remove an external disk, the files are not protected."
"The UI needs to be simplified."
"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention could improve by having artificial intelligence."
"The product fails to offer automatic classification capabilities to its users."
More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Cons →
"The whole UI of the server console installed on the standalone computers is hefty."
"Trellix is incompatible with Linux, and its DLP part is incompatible with Mac. Sometimes, it does not work on Windows, either."
"In future releases, I would like to see like to see encryption available on the cloud-based version."
"Trellix needs to improve customer support."
More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is ranked 9th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 29 reviews while Trellix DLP is ranked 21st in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 4 reviews. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is rated 7.4, while Trellix DLP is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention writes "Highly beneficial DLP functionality, full system protection, and useful file scanning". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix DLP writes "Comes in a single console: Emission, endpoint security, everything in one product, one agent". McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is most compared with HP Wolf Security, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, Cisco Secure Endpoint and Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, whereas Trellix DLP is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Varonis Platform, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and CoSoSys Endpoint Protector. See our McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Trellix DLP report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
