Digital Guardian vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention comparison

Fortra and McAfee are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Fortra is ranked #17 with an average rating of 4.5, while McAfee is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.5. Fortra holds a 2.7% mindshare in DLP, compared to McAfee’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 77% of McAfee users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention and Digital Guardian are key players in the data security category. Digital Guardian appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced data classification and protection features.

Features: McAfee offers a single-agent platform, easy configuration, and effective endpoint monitoring. Its administration is user-friendly, helping to streamline security management. Digital Guardian delivers advanced data classification, protection across multiple vectors, and impressive analytics, enhancing its capability to secure sensitive data.

Room for Improvement: McAfee is criticized for heavy resource use on virtual machines, high support costs, and a complex interface. It also experiences bugs and inconsistent support in some regions. Digital Guardian needs to improve agent stability, integration with Mac and Linux, and browser support, while users seek better policy management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: McAfee is usually on-premises but can be deployed on public clouds, earning mixed customer service reviews, especially regarding third-party dependencies. Digital Guardian is flexible across on-premises, public, and hybrid clouds, with generally responsive support but requires better regional coverage.

Pricing and ROI: Both products are expensive, though McAfee is seen as more cost-effective, with competitive pricing for full suites. Digital Guardian, while pricier, can justify costs with professional services for tailored data loss prevention. ROI for McAfee tends to be higher, whereas Digital Guardian's ROI is reliant on specific deployment configurations.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital Guardian vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 905,601 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare One is 2.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Digital Guardian is 2.7%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is 1.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Digital Guardian	2.7%
Cloudflare One	2.0%
McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention	1.2%
Other	94.1%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Cobe Van Coller

Network Architect at IP Dimension

Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites

I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.

Read full review

Syed Mubeen

Cyber Security Researcher at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Enterprise data protection has supported regulatory compliance and integrates with classification tools

In terms of functionality, many features are valuable in Digital Guardian, as the first thing for most customers is that they are using solutions such as Boldon James and Titus, which fall under the classification side, and Digital Guardian can easily integrate with this data classification solution and has a very granular level of configuration and policy tuning. Digital Guardian's data protection policies are indeed useful for my clients. Regarding Digital Guardian, I find it to be a very good solution, and in fact, it is an enterprise-level solution that has very tight integration with most of the products, with Fortra but also with others.

Read full review

Kalidas Mangle

Sr. System Engineer at Zensar Technologies

Data protection has improved as we restrict uploads to third-party sites and control devices

We are using customizable policies in the product. Everything is fine regarding alerting and reporting features; we got a notification as well as we received the required events, and it is working well. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is different; whatever the logs are there, they are available on the ePO, so we cannot directly integrate DLP to any third-party tool. We need to actually integrate the ePO itself to enable integration. We are just restricting data to be uploaded, which is the best option that allows us to control organizational data, making it the biggest benefit for us in McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention. We are protecting data to be uploaded on third party URLs, which helps us meet our needs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The simplicity of the solution is its valuable features as almost no effort was needed to learn the configurations. It is also one of the cheapest firewalls available in this category."

"Cloudflare DDoS is better than its competitors for its security, deployment, and scalability."

"It's the endpoint exposition. We don't need to expose our VPN server to the internet and need a zero-test solution. I can apply some conditional access to the endpoint that's connecting to our network to check their security policies or the security condition of their workstation. Once the workstation is trying to connect to my internal network, then I would like to check the discrete condition of these endpoints that are trying to access my internal network. We created some conditional access. We have CrowdStrike, to check if the CrowdStrike is installed, to check if it's updated, and to check for Windows updates. We created some conditional policies to check it."

"We mostly use Cloudflare WAF, and gets basic Cloudflaire DDoS, caching as extra bonus . We like the factor these features are all integrated into 1 console, simple to manage."

"Clover is the best product globally."

"The solution has different options that can be used to differentiate DDoS attacks."

"What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection."

"It will take the blow rather than our applications should an attack occur."

More Cloudflare One pros

"The most valuable feature of Digital Guardian is its reputation. They have scored high on the Gartner Magic Quadrant."

"Some of the features that are highly appreciated are its robust data loss prevention capabilities, flexible deployment options, and the ability to monitor data transfer across multiple vectors."

"The strong impact of Digital Guardian on my organization is in preventing sensitive data leaks to USB, email, and cloud, and in blocking unauthorized access in real time."

"It can scale from 100 to 10,000. There's no problem with the scalability."

"Digital Guardian has cloud correlation servers which give you visibility, work like EDR, and the correlation servers are like a perfect instrument for security analysts."

"There is a built-in endpoint detection response that helps save money."

"The feature we call desktop recording is the most valuable aspect of the solution. Not only can we collect data from the user's usage, but we also capture his screenshots when he is trying to steal the data."

"We have been able to monitor access to files from each of our workstations."

More Digital Guardian pros

"It can scale."

"I would recommend this solution to other companies as it is stable and strong in data loss prevention and works quite well."

"The product provides us with an excellent, dependable solution to recommend to clients for their security needs."

"The stability of the solution can be good. However, the configuration takes a long time for it to be done properly."

"The user is given a high level of confidence, which is a very good feature of the solution."

"This solution has a rich set of policies and provides a level of protection even for removable devices."

"The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal confidential information from endpoints."

"The most valuable feature right now is the user control."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention pros

Cons

"They don't have a person to provide support for customers using the solution under their free plan."

"Cloudflare One is not very powerful, but for what we require, it is basic and sufficient."

"The initial onboarding was causing us some confusion."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform needs to improve its documentation. It took time to do the implementation."

"When there are any dynamic changes in complex applications, the tool takes a lot of time, making its analytics-related area a major matter of concern where improvements are needed."

"Feedback could be enhanced. While I work efficiently with Clover as a partner in Mexico City, sometimes the information and requests are easier to manage with more concrete solutions."

"Feedback could be enhanced."

"The response time for support must be reduced."

More Cloudflare One cons

"I would like to see the workflow, to get all the rules and policies set up, be less complicated."

"My biggest lesson learned from dealing with this product is that they commit to something but they don't deliver it."

"If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility."

"The room for improvement with Digital Guardian is that it will be better with the Linux agent because it is the only DLP solution for Linux workstations. It still needs to upgrade the agents to the latest version for the Linux kernel."

"Some features on Mac and Linux are not complete currently. For example, some device control features haven't been transferred over to the other systems. If they could have their Windows features also available on Mac and Linux, that would be perfect. Some of our customers have a Mac environment for their RD environment. Having the solution fully capable of handling everything in a Mac environment is crucial."

"It would be helpful if there was an on-premise version of the solution for companies that cannot use the cloud, such as government sectors."

"For vendor support, such as Fortra support, I would rate it a seven because all the support comes from different parts that sometimes have challenges meeting time zones, and sometimes they reroute to distributors and rely on partners."

"The initial setup is a bit more complex than other solutions."

More Digital Guardian cons

"There needs to be support for blocking the sending of files by email because even if you block or remove an external disk, the files are not protected."

"Lacks GDPR regulations to enhance security."

"The price of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive. It is not the most expensive solution but it is typically 15 to 20 percent higher than other solutions."

"The UI needs to be simplified."

"The solution needs an easier integration in heterogeneous and dynamic environments."

"Integration with other vendors could be improved. For example, with Chrome or Firefox."

"The licensing cost for McAfee Total Protection could be cheaper, but apart from that, I don't need anything else. The software has what I need."

"The product uses a lot of resources and because of this it is not always a good solution for every situation."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not that expensive."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."

"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."

"The prices are slightly expensive."

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."

"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."

"Digital Guardian has both, subscription and perpetual licenses, but I think when everything (all technologies) will go to the cloud they will only offer subscriptions."

"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten because Digital Guardian is expensive."

"The price of Digital Guardian is on the higher end compared to other vendors."

"If I compare Digital Guardian with Symantec, the license cost is lower, but McAfee can be cheaper than Digital Guardian. It depends on how many licenses you plan to buy and how big the project is. The cost is not so high as Symantec, but not as cheap as McAfee. They can easily sell the solution for price."

"The cost was around $300,000."

"The price of Digital Guardian is expensive."

"I'm paying the license for McAfee Total Protection yearly. It could be cheaper, but it's fine."

"The price is high for this type of product."

"It's not a cheap option."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive."

"There is an annual license to use this solution."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"The price of the solution could improve."

"The pricing seems expensive both for the license and the support."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

905,601 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

Pricing is competitive. Akamai is more expensive, in my view.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

In my opinion, Cloudflare One can be improved mainly through compatibility, as the integration should be much simpler...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

Cloudflare One's primary use case for my organization is to protect servers and to provide remote access with the VPN...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital Guardian?

In my experience, the area closest for improvement is the occurrence of strong false positives. Digital Guardian can ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Digital Guardian?

My main use case for Digital Guardian is to prevent or stop sensitive data from being copied to USB, email, or cloud,...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Digital Guardian?

Digital Guardian has significantly improved incident response time by providing real-time detection, instant alerts, ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

I rate the pricing for McAfee as competitive compared to other companies; they are in the same range, not a cheap pro...

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

Sometimes there are some issues in the product itself; whenever they release a new version, vulnerabilities come into...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

We are working with McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention and Trellix products in our environment, but not...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 4% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Twingate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudflare One Competitors

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Digital Guardian

Compared 7% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 5% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Digital Guardian

Compared 5% of the time

SecureTrust Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Digital Guardian

Compared 3% of the time

More Digital Guardian Competitors

HP Wolf Security vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 17% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 10% of the time

Nightfall vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 2% of the time

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare One

July 2026

Download Cloudflare One product report

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian

July 2026

Download Digital Guardian product report

Buyer's Guide

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

July 2026

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention report

Download McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform

No data available

McAfee Total Protection for Data, McAfee Total Protection for DLP, Total Protection for Data, Intel Security Total Protection for Data

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?

Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

Digital Guardian is renowned for its advanced capabilities in data loss prevention and protection of confidential information. Key features enhance data security through proactive monitoring and adaptive policies, catering to businesses across multiple environments.

Digital Guardian provides comprehensive data security by offering features like data classification, endpoint DLP monitoring, and user activity tracking. It integrates seamlessly with tools such as Boldon James and Titus, allowing detailed policy configuration. With security-enhancing cloud correlation servers, it reduces insider threats and enables monitoring across diverse vectors. However, challenges include the need for improved integration between endpoint and network features, enhanced Mac and Linux functionality, and more efficient policy management. Stability and performance issues are also noted, with users seeking improved web email monitoring and better compatibility across different operating systems. Despite these, it remains a solid choice for data protection, particularly in sectors like finance, insurance, and manufacturing.

What are the key features of Digital Guardian?

Data Loss Prevention: Guards against unauthorized data transfers and leaks.
Forensic Analysis: Offers deep insights for improved threat response.
Adaptive Inspection: Tailors security measures to dynamic threats.
Data Classification: Segments data for targeted policy application.
User Activity Tracking: Monitors user interactions for anomalies.

What benefits should users expect?

Enhanced Security Visibility: Better monitoring across multiple vectors reduces risks.
Improved Threat Response: Advanced analytics ensure timely responses to threats.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps meet sector-specific requirements like those in finance.
Scalable Deployment: Supports cloud and on-premise environments for flexibility.

In industries such as finance, insurance, and manufacturing, Digital Guardian is crucial for preventing data breaches and protecting intellectual property. Its focus on compliance and ability to monitor data transfers across endpoints, networks, and emails provide essential safeguards against insider threats and unauthorized information dissemination.

Fortra

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention provides comprehensive security through robust data loss prevention, USB control, and endpoint protection. It is valued for its stability, scalability, and ease of management, offering significant policy customization and integration capabilities.

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention addresses compliance issues, human error, and unauthorized data sharing. It integrates well with ePO, offering virtual desktop security and affordability, which contributes to comprehensive threat monitoring. While praised for its stability, it faces challenges with pricing, resource consumption, and UI complexity. Users report slow customer support and desire advanced AI features, enhanced protection against sophisticated attacks, and better policy flexibility.

What are the key features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies administration with an intuitive design.
Data Loss Prevention: Strong measures to prevent unauthorized data leaks.
USB Control: Controls data transfer through USB devices.
Endpoint Protection: Secures endpoints against potential threats.
Policy Customization: Extensive options for creating tailored security policies.
ePO Integration: Seamless integration with McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator for management.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated when considering McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

Stability and Scalability: Reliable protection that grows with organizational needs.
Ease of Management: Streamlined processes for security administration.
Compliance Assistance: Helps maintain regulatory compliance effectively.
Comprehensive Threat Monitoring: Ensures robust protection against threats.

Organizations deploy McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention to secure sensitive data, prevent unauthorized leaks, and improve endpoint protection. It is commonly used by banks, consulting firms, and service providers for monitoring, controlling data flows, enforcing security policies, encrypting data, and ensuring compliance, often integrating into existing infrastructures to protect against external threats while maintaining internal data integrity.

McAfee

Sample Customers

23andMe

The Fifth Avenue Theatre, Jabil Circuit

Kleberg Bank

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

June 2026

Free Report: Digital Guardian vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital Guardian vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

905,601 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital Guardian vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.