Catchpoint vs Eggplant Test comparison

Catchpoint and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category. Catchpoint is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.3. Catchpoint holds a 2.4% mindshare in DEM, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

Catchpoint

Read 14 Catchpoint reviews

1,967 Views
275 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

3,597 Views
72 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

Eggplant Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Catchpoint and Eggplant Test are competitive tools in application performance and monitoring. Catchpoint seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive monitoring tools and responsive customer support, while Eggplant Test is preferred for its advanced automation capabilities.

Features: Catchpoint provides robust monitoring, real-time analytics, and diverse testing capabilities. Eggplant Test excels with powerful automation, effective integration options, and offers functional and regression testing. Catchpoint's solutions focus on comprehensive performance monitoring, whereas Eggplant Test provides flexibility in automated testing strategies.

Room for Improvement: Catchpoint could improve its user interface to be more intuitive, enhance integration with third-party tools, and offer more customizable alerts. Eggplant Test may benefit from reducing its complexity for new users, improving documentation for better understanding, and optimizing OCR technology for more accuracy.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Eggplant Test offers a smooth deployment with flexible options, focusing on automated test creation and integration. Catchpoint ensures a seamless onboarding process with broad support and flexibility. Eggplant's deployment versatility is notable, while Catchpoint provides excellent customer service through effective support channels.

Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint involves higher setup costs but focuses on long-term value through comprehensive monitoring solutions, ensuring stable ROI. Eggplant Test, despite higher upfront costs, promises quicker ROI due to its intensive automation capabilities, reducing manual testing time. Catchpoint offers immediate cost-effectiveness, while Eggplant Test's automation efficiencies justify its initial expenditure with ongoing savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Catchpoint vs. Eggplant Test Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Eggplant Test

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (38th), Network Monitoring Software (62nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (31st)

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Test Automation Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category, the mindshare of Catchpoint is 2.4%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Eggplant Test is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Catchpoint	2.4%
Eggplant Test	0.9%
Other	96.7%

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

Featured Reviews

AnmolRai

Technical Consultant Project Lead at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Valuable monitoring features enhance ecommerce experience while improvement needed in region-specific insights

As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues. We are currently using an external tool, Splunk, for reporting. If we could receive similar data for the China market as we do for North America and Asia Pacific, this would be helpful.

Read full review

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers three different ways of slicing data to look for abnormalities."

"Catchpoint helped us establish that something is in a provider network, so we could tell our customers to check their internet provider because the traffic is not getting to us. You need to be gentle when you tell them that, but the fact that we could do it was crucial."

"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to identify and troubleshoot network issues."

"One of the features, the scatter plot, is very useful. It shows red dots wherever there are issues."

"The thing I like most is the tech support in this company, because they have 24/7 chat support. We can chat immediately and ask them about an issue and they keep responding. They create tickets on our behalf and respond."

"The drill-down feature of this product was very good. It allowed us to identify the exact page or area of the site that was causing our customers an issue."

"We really need the API monitoring, as well as client side session monitoring, the global synthetic monitoring, to track the availability of the systems from the customer side."

"The most valuable features of Catchpoint are basically the transaction monitors on the API and UI."

More Catchpoint pros

"The biggest advantage has been the ability to improve the quality significantly."

"The most valuable features would be the image recognition and the OCR."

"Good text reading ability."

"It is easy to set up."

"The solution is based on a Windows model, where adding users is just a few clicks. It is easy to manage users and add them."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create code from a flow chart, and then run the code through it."

"The solution is a stable one."

"We did see a massive return on investment from using Eggplant."

More Eggplant Test pros

Cons

"Trending needs improvement. Currently, out-of-the-box, they provide only seven days availability. So, we have to do queries and we have to go into a separate analysis module, we have to run lot of queries to long-term trends."

"Catchpoint can be improved by focusing solely on network monitoring."

"We would like the script creation feature of this solution to be improved, as it currently requires a complicated manual process to update the scripts."

"if we need to do performance analysis, we have to click too many times. For example, if there is an issue that is caught by Catchpoint, we need to understand what the error is and at which step it failed, or which transaction that is impacted. To drill down, we have to click too many things to get the answer."

"It would be great if Catchpoint could incorporate its alerting system instead of relying on separate tools like ServiceNow."

"There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing."

"A room for improvement in Catchpoint is that it lacks an automated page updating feature. My company receives all the alerts and notifications it needs, but the page doesn't update automatically. You need to manually refresh the page, so every five minutes you need to refresh it to see the most updated information. If there's an automated page refresh feature, that would help my company. It's a feature that Grafana has. The page auto-refreshes in Grafana, so you don't have to manually refresh the page. If that feature is implemented in Catchpoint, it'll be useful for the users. Another area for improvement in the tool is you have to do a manual task, for example, when you have a notification for a market, you get a zip code that the user could have entered, but if the zip code is incorrect, you have to manually go into Catchpoint and update that parameter, so that manual step is another area in the tool that needs improvement."

"As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues."

More Catchpoint cons

"The execution times are a little slower, and the two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture."

"Eggplant Test should emphasize on improving its offering in non-Windows environments."

"A step forward would be to have event support, because it is more or less linear at the moment."

"Eggplant Test is not a stable solution at all in my experience."

"If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems."

"Since there are very few customers in the Indian region, there is no training available, and it's challenging to find skilled talent."

"The reporting function is a bit shallow. The solution does not offer very comprehensive reporting in terms of your test results. The reporting time and the logs are very high level as well. These areas need improvement."

"We found that we had issues regarding the VPN setup, which is one of the reasons that we did not purchase this solution."

More Eggplant Test cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Retailer

12%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Catchpoint?

Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models. Clients typically see significant operational and cost efficiencies, with time savings estimated between 30% and 40%.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

See all answers

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 16% of the time

Datadog vs Catchpoint

Compared 11% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 10% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Catchpoint

Compared 5% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 16% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

January 2026

Download Catchpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

January 2026

Download Eggplant Test product report

Also Known As

No data available

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

Overview

Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.

Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/

Catchpoint

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Eggplant Test

December 2025

Free Report: Catchpoint vs. Eggplant Test

Find out what your peers are saying about Catchpoint vs. Eggplant Test and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Catchpoint vs. Eggplant Test report.

See our list of best Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) vendors.

We monitor all Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.