Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Broadcom and Kaseya are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #104, while Kaseya is ranked #69 with an average rating of 6.3. Broadcom holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.
CA Unified Communications M...
Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews
  • 202 Views
  • 81 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
Kaseya Traverse
Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews
  • 488 Views
  • 184 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and Kaseya Traverse compete in the network performance monitoring and management space. While CA Unified Communications Monitor offers advantages in pricing and support, Kaseya Traverse is considered superior for its robust features, making it worth the investment.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides comprehensive communication monitoring, troubleshooting capabilities, and insights into voice and video traffic. Kaseya Traverse excels with advanced network topology mapping, predictive analytics, and network visualization, which distinguish it from its competitors.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could enhance its user interface, expand integration capabilities, and improve reporting features. Kaseya Traverse might benefit from simplifying its deployment process, reducing its resource intensity, and offering more flexible pricing structures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support, appealing to organizations seeking quick implementation. Kaseya Traverse, despite a potentially more complex setup due to its comprehensive features, is supported by detailed documentation and dedicated support, catering to larger or more complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor presents a competitive setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious buyers, providing strong ROI through efficient monitoring and support services. Kaseya Traverse, although requiring a higher initial investment, offers substantial ROI with powerful features and detailed monitoring solutions, attractive for those seeking advanced capabilities and deeper network performance insights.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
104th
Average Rating
6.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Unified Communications Monitoring (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (76th)
Kaseya Traverse
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
69th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Monitoring Software (37th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981 - PeerSpot reviewer
Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features
The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.
Read full review
AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive
Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Good end-to-end monitoring"
"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."
"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."
"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."
"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."
"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."
"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."
"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."
"The remote support and data collection features are great."
"It's a simple and humble tool."
More Kaseya Traverse pros
 

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."
"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."
"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."
"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."
"Reporting is a bit difficult."
"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."
"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."
"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."
"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."
"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."
More Kaseya Traverse cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."
"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
28%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Non Profit
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?
The remote support and data collection features are great.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?
The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?
Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpfu...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse
Compared 44% of the time
Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kaseya Traverse Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kaseya Traverse
Compared 23% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse
Compared 17% of the time
LogicMonitor vs Kaseya Traverse Logo
LogicMonitor vs Kaseya Traverse
Compared 17% of the time
More Kaseya Traverse Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic
May 2025
CA Unified Communications Monitor reportDownload CA Unified Communications Monitor product report
Buyer's Guide
Kaseya Traverse
June 2025
Kaseya Traverse reportDownload Kaseya Traverse product report
 

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor
No data available
 

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya
 

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass
UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust
Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse
June 2025
Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.