CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Icinga comparison

Broadcom and Icinga are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #104, while Icinga is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.8. Broadcom holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to Icinga’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Icinga users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

202 Views
81 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

3,465 Views
2,580 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

Icinga

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and Icinga are network monitoring and performance management products. CA Unified Communications Monitor seems to have the upper hand in providing better support and reliability, whereas Icinga's flexibility and open-source model make it appealing for customizable solutions.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides advanced analytics, real-time monitoring, and detailed performance insights to optimize network performance. Icinga offers customizable alerts, extensive integration options, and a scalable architecture, which make it flexible for various applications.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could improve in offering more affordable pricing options and expanding integration capabilities. Icinga might enhance ease of deployment, user interface complexity, and documentation clarity to improve user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor is known for straightforward deployment and strong customer support, ideal for organizations seeking hassle-free setup. Icinga's more complex deployment is supported by an active community, offering valuable resources for troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor has a higher initial setup cost but offers higher ROI with its comprehensive capabilities and reliability. Icinga's lower initial cost suits budget-conscious organizations, though customization and maintenance expenses might offset its affordability.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Icinga Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Icinga

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,687 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

104th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

76th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th)

Icinga

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

10th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (8th), Cloud Monitoring Software (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Icinga is 3.3%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Harrison Bulley

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Net Consulting

A stable, scalable and cost-effective solution that helps with inbuilt scripts for easy modification

I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"The value of Icinga is that it has hundreds of plugins, so it's really easy to monitor pretty much anything."

"Icinga has multiple automation and integration features. There is an API for everything and a web UI for configurations. The APIs enable you to automate tasks in Icinga. We can also use plugins to talk to the API. The Icinga Director talks to a database in the background, and you can import settings from the CMDB to all systems in Icinga."

"The apply rules feature saves a lot of time."

"The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first."

"This solution has a self-healing handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted."

"I like the ability to amend and adjust things really easily, which is useful in a case where you could make it auto-discover and then set a template to say all of these applications or servers under this template have an automatic threshold set that you’d set up manually."

"The drafts are easy but what I like about Icinga is that there are many add-ons that you can download."

"There's a module called Icinga Director, which helps us configure the product using an intuitive interface through clicks instead of creating a text configuration. It's very helpful for us."

More Icinga pros

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."

"The installation and configuration are very complex."

"There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved."

"Icinga is a complex solution that's hard to learn. It's a powerful product for monitoring, but new users will have a hard time figuring out what to do."

"The user interface should be improved."

"I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built."

"The solution lacks many features important to higher-level IT management and network support."

"Icinga’s automation could be improved."

More Icinga cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"It's an open-source solution."

"The solution is cheap."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"The solution is free to use."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Icinga?

The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Icinga?

It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low. If you want to include this product in the services you offer to your customers, the return on i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Icinga?

There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved. For instance, multi-tenancy for monitoring the virtual infrastructur...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 42% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 22% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 11% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 4% of the time

Centreon vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

May 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

June 2025

Download Icinga product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

Icinga monitors systems, network devices, infrastructure, and services, helping manage and analyze server resources. It automates ticket incidents and alerting, providing oversight of client Windows and Linux systems.

Icinga offers comprehensive monitoring of servers including CPU utilization and RAM space, facilitating automated incident management and alerting. Frequently deployed on-premises, this monitoring tool is key for managed services providers and organizations to oversee and ensure optimal performance of various environments, including applications like databases and web servers. It provides extensive features for creating custom plugins, stabilization, scalability, and high customization capabilities suitable for different infrastructure needs.

What are the key features of Icinga?

Event Handler: Facilitates automatic self-healing of systems.
Extensive Plugin Library: Offers a wide range of plugins for monitoring.
Ease of Use: Simplifies user experience with an intuitive interface and Icinga Director for easy configurations.
Open-Source Nature: Free to use, modify, and distribute.
Automation Capabilities: Integrates with APIs and Ansible Collections for automation.
Custom Plugins: Users can create and integrate their own plugins.
Stability and Scalability: Provides reliable performance across different scale infrastructures.

What are the benefits or ROI to look for when evaluating Icinga?

Critical Issue Highlighting: Effectively identifies and notifies about critical problems.
High Customization: Offers flexibility for diverse monitoring needs.
Automated Alerting: Reduces manual effort and improves response times.
Extensive Integration: Works seamlessly with other tools and platforms.

Icinga implementations span multiple industries, providing essential monitoring for IT infrastructure in healthcare, finance, and education. Managed services providers utilize Icinga to maintain and monitor client systems across various environments while ensuring optimal performance and compliance. It is highly valued in these sectors for its ability to customize monitoring, improving operational efficiency and reducing downtime.

Icinga

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Icinga

May 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Icinga

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Icinga and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Icinga report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.