CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Zabbix comparison

Broadcom and Zabbix are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #95, while Zabbix is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. Broadcom holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to Zabbix’s 11.7% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Zabbix users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

422 Views
300 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Zabbix

Read 107 Zabbix reviews

24,036 Views
14,422 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

Zabbix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and Zabbix compete in network monitoring. Zabbix seems to have the upper hand with its robust feature set and adaptability to varied IT environments.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor delivers advanced analytics, real-time call monitoring, and improved communication oversight. Zabbix provides extensive network monitoring, customizable metrics, and multi-environment support, offering wide-ranging utility.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could enhance its multi-platform integration, expand analytics features, and reduce deployment time. Zabbix might benefit from simplifying its setup process, increasing customer support options, and enhancing its reporting tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor is recognized for simple deployment and quick support, ensuring smooth integration. Zabbix presents a complicated deployment but offers robust community support and comprehensive documentation, emphasizing flexibility and available resources.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor requires a higher upfront investment but offers transparent pricing, which can lead to good ROI for communication monitoring. Zabbix provides a cost-effective option with lower initial costs, promising strong ROI due to its low ongoing expenses and extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Zabbix

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

95th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

67th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (6th)

Zabbix

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

1st

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

107

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (9th), Server Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zabbix is 11.7%, up from 11.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Zabbix	11.7%
CA Unified Communications Monitor	0.2%
Other	88.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

B Ahmed

Manager, Information Technology Zara & Inditex at Cenomi

Enables seamless global client monitoring with reliable remote connectivity

I use the solution to provide a perfect environment for remote connectivity with my clients. Many tools that I require for system maintenance are included. I can easily monitor all of my clients throughout the world I did not give much thought to it, however, improvements could be made to Zabbix.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"We like the user-interface for this solution, which makes it an easy to use tool."

"Zabbix is a cost-effective solution. We're a small organization with a few dozen devices to monitor, and it was available for free. We can see what we need. We haven't done an in-depth analysis on it, but we're currently okay with the product."

"Health and communication links availability."

"It's the best solution. Great. I would rate the overall solution ten out of ten."

"Like other common Linux distributions, some of the most valuable features of this solution are the ease of use and deployment. It's simple and has a lot of packages and a lot of software."

"I have found that the reporting feature in Zabbix is most valuable. Additionally, the solution has given us bandwidth options, we are able to see where problems are. For example, we noticed a problem that occurred because of a bad interface going in the wireless VLAN."

"The initial setup was not complex."

"There are lots of great features and functionality within the solution."

More Zabbix pros

Cons

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"The documentation could be improved."

"As far as improvements, sometimes I get a bit frustrated when I move from a previous version to a new one because some configuration has changed—I need to investigate the documentation to deal with some configuration. But it doesn't take much time, so it's okay."

"I am having difficulties connecting it to Grafana, as well as some of the other plugins like Kibana."

"In terms of user-friendliness, large maps could be more interactive. We should be able to click on some areas and move some objects. It would make it simpler to see things while analyzing some dedicated parameters."

"Implementation is always tailored to the customer and the kind of information we need from the client to carry it out can make them very uncomfortable. Sometimes the clients are not ready to share it."

"An area for improvement would be the ease of doing aggregation from the value or different devices."

"There are a lot of areas for improvement, specifically in the dashboards and reports functionalities."

"Zabbix can use better documentation and support for troubleshooting."

More Zabbix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"This is an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"This solution is completely open-source, so it is quite affordable."

"Zabbix is open-source so if one wishes to implement it in-house, they must have qualified professionals to set up and optimize databases, Linux/Unix OS, PHP, Apache, and depending on what is monitored, a full-stack network and systems administrator may be needed."

"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"There are no licenses."

"If you have 20,000 hosts, the support costs around €95,000 for a year."

"My manager is very happy because it doesn't cost anything."

"It's free software released under the GNU/GPL license."

More Zabbix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	53
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Zabbix?

The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?

If you want to save costs, you can use Zabbix.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zabbix?

The reporting is lacking because this is an open-source tool, and nowadays, management's expectation is that the reports should be of high quality and every information should be presented in a con...

See all answers

Comparisons

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 43% of the time

Precisely Network Management vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 31% of the time

ITRS Geneos vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 27% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

Checkmk vs Zabbix

Compared 9% of the time

LibreNMS vs Zabbix

Compared 9% of the time

Icinga vs Zabbix

Compared 6% of the time

NetXMS vs Zabbix

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zabbix

Compared 4% of the time

More Zabbix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

September 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Zabbix

August 2025

Download Zabbix product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

No data available

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

Zabbix

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Zabbix

September 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Zabbix

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Zabbix and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Zabbix report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.