Icinga vs SolarWinds NPM comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Icinga and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Icinga is ranked #49, while SolarWinds is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Icinga holds a 1.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to SolarWinds’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Icinga users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

8,249 Views
5,939 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

SolarWinds NPM

Read 161 SolarWinds NPM reviews

28,370 Views
21,845 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Icinga

SolarWinds NPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

SolarWinds NPM and Icinga compete in the network monitoring category. While SolarWinds offers ease of use and comprehensive features, Icinga provides customization and flexibility, highlighting distinct advantages in user experience and adaptability.

Features: SolarWinds NPM offers SNMP monitoring, modular pricing, and support for multiple vendors. Its robust alert system and an active online community enhance its value. Icinga delivers a robust automation and integration ecosystem with numerous plugins, enabling extensive customization and open-source flexibility.

Room for Improvement: SolarWinds NPM faces criticism for resource-heavy requirements, a complex dependency structure, and unintuitive alert configurations. Its vast feature set can be overwhelming, with additional modules necessary for full functionality. Icinga could improve dashboard usability, automation for repetitive tasks, and integration with third-party solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SolarWinds NPM offers multiple deployment options, such as on-premises and hybrid cloud, with a steep learning curve due to its comprehensive features. Customer service is generally reliable but can be slow on non-critical issues. Icinga is mostly deployed on-premises, known for its straightforward setup, though lacking broad cloud support. Its community-driven support is a strong point but may occasionally lack timely responses.

Pricing and ROI: SolarWinds NPM has a high initial license cost, especially with extra modules, though the ROI is significant due to its powerful features. Icinga, being open-source, offers a cost-effective alternative with optional paid support. Despite its lower financial entry point, Icinga requires more manual maintenance, potentially increasing operational costs indirectly.

To learn more, read our detailed Icinga vs. SolarWinds NPM Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Icinga vs. SolarWinds NPM

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,749 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Icinga

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

49th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

51st

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

35th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (17th)

SolarWinds NPM

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

3rd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

8th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

161

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Icinga is 1.1%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds NPM is 3.6%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SolarWinds NPM	3.6%
Icinga	1.1%
Other	95.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2292201

Innovation Service Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have but average multi-tenancy aspect

It's supported by the community. We use Icinga, which is not part of the Open-Source platform but is wrapped into a commercial solution from another provider, a local provider in Italy. Icinga is an open-source platform, so it is supported by the community. It's quite easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have. So it's not expensive, and it's quite a general purpose. We can easily monitor any kind of infrastructure we encounter. The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated. The alerting is the same as any other monitoring platform. It's not a "wow" feature that has changed our lives, but it's perfectly adequate.

Read full review

Vivek Jaiswal

Manager IT at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Central monitoring has improved outage alerts and now needs smarter detection and modern dashboards

Regarding the automated network topology and mapping feature in SolarWinds NPM, I am not satisfied with it. For static monitoring, it is acceptable. However, if it is possible, I would need a feature in SolarWinds in the future for some kind of malfunctioning detection, such as malware attacks or that type of environment. We did not have any facility to detect that in SolarWinds. I think it would be better to incorporate those types of features. Regarding customization options in SolarWinds, the ability to customize the dashboard has room for improvement. The dashboard is quite old, and we need some improvement in it. Nowadays, we have multiple tools with AI-based monitoring and web-based dashboards. SolarWinds also has a web-based dashboard, but I think there is scope for improvement in the UI. There may be other areas I would like to improve in SolarWinds NPM.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If you have a small infrastructure or a small number of devices that you want to monitor, then I think it's a good solution."

"The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first."

"There's a module called Icinga Director, which helps us configure the product using an intuitive interface through clicks instead of creating a text configuration. It's very helpful for us."

"The apply rules feature saves a lot of time."

"It is really easy in Icinga to create your own plugin and integrate it without any fuss. And it works just perfectly fine."

"We have found the solution to be stable."

"The drafts are easy but what I like about Icinga is that there are many add-ons that you can download."

"I use it for monitoring infrastructure and it was very good for that issue."

More Icinga pros

"The connectivity of the solution is very good."

"As far as assisting in being proactive in our network, it's been a great help in helping us maintain a healthy environment and being proactive and making sure things are up to date and upgraded."

"SolarWinds is reasonably priced."

"It provides a centralized view on alerts, state, health and performance of the network devices with real time network updates, in-depth traffic reports to pinpoint bandwidth issues before they affect end-users, and helps administrators identify and fix bandwidth issues faster while aiding in capacity planning."

"Everything has been complete and stable for our needs over the past four years."

"Awesome product with a lot of info available and great support team."

"It gives us a map of the network setup and one console to see the entire network."

"Single pane for monitoring scales and creates new business opportunities."

More SolarWinds NPM pros

Cons

"It is not really adequate for our current needs. It causes additional issues which we have to work around and takes us time that a better solution would not."

"In general, the product does not look good. However, it does what it is supposed to do. So, the improvements should focus on usability and UI."

"Sometimes, it is very hard to keep an overview of what's happening."

"The installation and configuration are very complex."

"Network Discovery capabilities would be extremely helpful."

"Scalability is problematic. If you have a stable environment it's good, but if the environment is growing, I had some problems with Icinga."

"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."

"At this time, the layout of the website is a bit difficult. It should be more user-friendly for changing the background and logos."

More Icinga cons

"It would be nice to manage all network devces from just one single platform, instead of going to different platforms."

"The root cause analysis and installation faults are not clear."

"SolarWinds NPM could improve the graphics of the interface and more customized reporting."

"GUI needs improvement with a more graphical dashboard."

"The user should be able to customize the dashboard to their own requirements."

"Technical Support has plenty of room for improvement, knowledge of their product was not very strong."

"Having more technical and support resources available in Saudi Arabia would be helpful."

"Going through the wizard to create these new pollers is quite cumbersome if you don't understand what you're doing."

More SolarWinds NPM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheap."

"It's an open-source solution."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"The solution is free to use."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"The price points are more than competitive when compared to other vendors."

"There's standard licensing, and then it depends on the size of the customer."

"We pay approximately $4,000 annually for SolarWinds NPM. There are no additional fees required other than the standard fees."

"It was inexpensive when we installed it and gradually became more expensive, but it was a very inexpensive product at first."

"I believe the original setup cost was around $3500 with an annual cost of around $1200-$1500 to renew the support license. This would bring the average day-to-day cost of around $5-$6 over three years."

"The solution's pricing is low compared to a lot of other tools in the market."

"The licensing model is such that you can purchase only what you need; and then grow into the next level by paying only the difference in price and the associated maintenance costs."

"The cost of the personal perpetual license for SolarWinds NPM is approximately $2,000."

More SolarWinds NPM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,749 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

14%

University

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	60
Midsize Enterprise	33
Large Enterprise	87

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or kind of devices (network devices, servers, something else). Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better for a cloud monitoring...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

From my point of view, SolarWind is the best tool.

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

We are partners with SolarWinds and we sell a lot of Network management to large enterprises also because of scalability, products like Network Performance Monitor & Netflow Traffic Analyzer ar...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

NETSCOUT Network & Application Observability vs Icinga

Compared 2% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

Nagios XI vs SolarWinds NPM

Compared 3% of the time

DX Spectrum vs SolarWinds NPM

Compared 3% of the time

Zabbix vs SolarWinds NPM

Compared 3% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs SolarWinds NPM

Compared 2% of the time

NETSCOUT Network & Application Observability vs SolarWinds NPM

Compared 2% of the time

More SolarWinds NPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

October 2026

Download Icinga product report

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds NPM

October 2026

Download SolarWinds NPM product report

Also Known As

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor, SolarWinds Network Bandwidth Analyzer

Overview

Icinga is an open-source monitoring platform known for stability and scalability. It offers object-oriented configuration, extensive plugins, and community support, providing a robust environment for monitoring servers, network devices, and infrastructure components.

Icinga facilitates intuitive setup through features like the Icinga Director, allowing for efficient configuration, automation via APIs, and flexible customization with add-ons. It supports clustering for distributed monitoring and self-healing event handlers. Integration with external tools further enhances its adaptability. While valuable, users suggest improvements in dashboard aesthetics, installation procedures, and data consistency. Automation and network discovery capabilities require further development, as does the need for built-in scripts and plugins. Icinga proves complex for beginners, with multi-tenancy support rated average and role management needing simplification.

What are Icinga's main features?

Object-Oriented Configuration: Simplifies custom plugin development and setup.
Icinga Director: Facilitates intuitive and efficient configuration management.
API Automation: Enables automated processes and seamless integrations.
Clustering Support: Allows scalable and distributed monitoring solutions.
Self-Healing Event Handlers: Automatically manage and correct system issues.
Integration and Add-Ons: Expands functionality with external tools.

Which benefits do reviews often highlight?

Scalability: Easily adapts to growing monitoring needs.
Community Support: Access to a wide range of shared knowledge and solutions.
Customizability: Tailors the platform to meet specific monitoring requirements.
Stability: Delivers consistent performance and reliability.

Organizations use Icinga to monitor Linux and AIX servers along with network devices, storage, and firewalls. It supports resource surveillance, application checks, automated ticket generation, and alerting. Managed service providers use it for multi-tenancy setups, finding it essential for server health and configuration management across mixed infrastructure landscapes, leveraging plugins and SNMP Traps for proactive monitoring.

Icinga

SolarWinds NPM is a network performance monitoring tool offering a user-friendly interface with customizable dashboards. It provides real-time tracking of device health, latency, and bandwidth utilization, supporting diverse integration and scalability needs.

SolarWinds NPM's robust features include real-time monitoring of network performance and efficient tracking of device health, latency, and bandwidth utilization. The tool is appreciated for its ease of deployment, scalability, and support for integration with other tools. Features like SNMP monitoring, NetPath, and comprehensive reporting enhance its diagnostic capabilities and network visibility. However, users identify areas for improvement such as real-time analytics, advanced customization options, and enhanced scalability for larger enterprises. Better customer support, improved integrations, and security measures are also desired.

What are the key features of SolarWinds NPM?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and operation.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows personalized data views.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant updates on network performance.
Strong Alerting Capabilities: Offers immediate notifications for issues.
Scalability: Supports growth with ease.
Integration: Works smoothly with other tools for comprehensive monitoring.
SNMP Monitoring: Tracks device stats effectively.
NetPath: Helps visualize network paths and performance.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Network Visibility: Enables proactive issue resolution.
Enhanced Diagnostics: Facilitates quicker troubleshooting.
Real-Time Performance Data: Supports informed decision-making.
Ease of Deployment: Reduces setup time and complexity.
Infrastructure Monitoring: Ensures network stability and reliability.
Custom Integration: Adapts to existing IT environments.

In enterprise environments, SolarWinds NPM is deployed to monitor network health and device status, sending alerts for any issues. It provides visibility into network performance, tracking bandwidth utilization and server metrics efficiently. Its applications span from monitoring routers, switches, and firewalls to supporting infrastructure monitoring across industries.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

Microsoft, Federal Express, Hewlett-Packard, and MasterCard

Buyer's Guide

Icinga vs. SolarWinds NPM

October 2026

Free Report: Icinga vs. SolarWinds NPM

Find out what your peers are saying about Icinga vs. SolarWinds NPM and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,749 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Icinga vs. SolarWinds NPM report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors, best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.