We performed a comparison between AWS CodeBuild and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation."The solution provides good integrations."
"The integration is a good feature."
"The integration is a good feature."
"It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR)."
"The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."
"Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products."
"TeamCity's GUI is nice."
"TeamCity is a very user-friendly tool."
"We would like to see better integration with other version controls, since we encountered difficulty when this we first attempted."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is its easy configuration. It also has multiple plugins that can be used especially for building .net applications."
"Using TeamCity and emailing everyone on fail is one way to emphasize the importance of testing code and showing management why taking the time to test actually does saves time from having to fix bugs on the other end."
"The integration is a valuable feature."
"VCS Trigger: Provides excellent source control support."
"There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds."
"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."
"They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild."
"The deployment fails sometimes."
"I would suggest creating simple and advanced configurations. Advanced configurations will give more customizations like Jenkins does."
"We've called TeamCity tech support. Unfortunately, all their tech support is based in Europe, so we end up with such a big time crunch that I now need to have one person in the US."
"REST API support lacks many features in customization of builds, jobs, and settings."
"I need some more graphical design."
"If there was more documentation that was easier to locate, it would be helpful for users."
"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs."
"Integrating with certain technologies posed challenges related to time and required support from the respective technology teams to ensure smooth integration with TeamCity."
"It will benefit this solution if they keep up to date with other CI/CD systems out there."
AWS CodeBuild is ranked 9th in Build Automation with 4 reviews while TeamCity is ranked 6th in Build Automation with 25 reviews. AWS CodeBuild is rated 8.8, while TeamCity is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS CodeBuild writes "Provides good integrations, is flexible, and has a comparable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamCity writes "Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans". AWS CodeBuild is most compared with Jenkins, GitLab, CircleCI, GitHub Actions and Tekton, whereas TeamCity is most compared with GitLab, CircleCI, Jenkins, Harness and Tekton.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
