No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
TeamCity Logo

Top 10 TeamCity Alternatives

Vendor: JetBrains
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

Top TeamCity Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to TeamCity based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include GitLab, VMware Tanzu Platform, and Jenkins. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

JetBrains Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with JetBrains, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
TeamCity Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
GitLab is popular for source code management, CI/CD pipelines, and team collaboration. Companies utilize it for repository management, automated deployment, and code integration. It integrates with tools like SonarQube, enhancing code analysis with cloud compatibility. Users appreciate branch management, automation, excellent user experience, and seek better integrations and improved documentation for enhanced productivity.
Download GitLab vs. TeamCity Report
I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month.
The price is okay.
View comparison
Pricing
I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month.
The price is okay.
TeamCity Logo
TeamCity Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform
4.0 out of 5
TeamCity offers flexibility and robust features ideal for easy build pipeline configuration. In comparison, VMware Tanzu Platform excels in multi-cluster management and comprehensive service delivery, making it suitable for complex environments needing advanced integration and monitoring.
Download TeamCity vs. VMware Tanzu Platform Report
TeamCity's setup costs are notably lower compared to VMware Tanzu Platform, offering a more budget-friendly option for smaller teams. However, VMware Tanzu Platform provides a comprehensive solution with a higher initial investment, appealing to enterprises seeking robust capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity's setup costs are notably lower compared to VMware Tanzu Platform, offering a more budget-friendly option for smaller teams. However, VMware Tanzu Platform provides a comprehensive solution with a higher initial investment, appealing to enterprises seeking robust capabilities.
TeamCity Logo
Jenkins
4.0 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Jenkins
4.0 out of 5
Jenkins offers a highly customizable platform with extensive plugin options and strong community support, ideal for cost-conscious enterprises. In comparison, TeamCity provides robust built-in features and dedicated support, appealing to larger organizations seeking seamless integration and comprehensive service packages.
Download Jenkins vs. TeamCity Report
Jenkins requires no initial setup cost, offering flexibility for open-source projects, while TeamCity involves setup expenses, providing comprehensive features for enterprise environments.
View comparison
Pricing
Jenkins requires no initial setup cost, offering flexibility for open-source projects, while TeamCity involves setup expenses, providing comprehensive features for enterprise environments.
TeamCity Logo
Tekton
3.9 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Tekton
3.9 out of 5
TeamCity offers flexible CI capabilities with cross-platform builds and an extensive plugin ecosystem, including Octopus Deploy. In comparison, Tekton excels with Kubernetes-native features for efficient cloud scaling and a serverless architecture, providing advanced customization options within Kubernetes environments.
Download TeamCity vs. Tekton Report
TeamCity has a moderate setup cost, while Tekton offers a more affordable option, highlighting a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity has a moderate setup cost, while Tekton offers a more affordable option, highlighting a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious users.
TeamCity Logo
Harness
3.9 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Harness
3.9 out of 5
TeamCity excels in integration capabilities appealing to diverse environments. In comparison, Harness offers advanced deployment automation, ideal for complex processes. TeamCity supports flexibility, while Harness provides AI-driven automation for streamlined workflows, enhancing ease of use for intricate deployment tasks.
Download Harness vs. TeamCity Report
TeamCity offers a straightforward setup cost, while Harness presents a more flexible pricing approach, highlighting a key difference in their initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity offers a straightforward setup cost, while Harness presents a more flexible pricing approach, highlighting a key difference in their initial investment requirements.
TeamCity Logo
GitHub Actions
4.2 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
GitHub Actions
4.2 out of 5
TeamCity offers robust CI/CD capabilities with flexible configurations and advanced build tools. In comparison, GitHub Actions provides seamless GitHub integration with extensive Marketplace Actions. TeamCity is ideal for intensive use, while GitHub Actions attracts small to medium teams with its cost-effectiveness.
Download GitHub Actions vs. TeamCity Report
TeamCity offers a straightforward setup, whereas GitHub Actions provides a more integrated experience within the GitHub ecosystem, highlighting the distinct setup approaches between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity offers a straightforward setup, whereas GitHub Actions provides a more integrated experience within the GitHub ecosystem, highlighting the distinct setup approaches between the two platforms.
TeamCity Logo
Chef
4.0 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Chef
4.0 out of 5
Chef offers superior integration with cloud infrastructure, while TeamCity excels in continuous integration. In comparison, Chef provides personalized support, but TeamCity's documentation fosters self-service. Chef's ROI benefits from automation, whereas TeamCity’s lower costs attract budget-conscious teams.
Download Chef vs. TeamCity Report
Chef has a higher setup cost, while TeamCity offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Chef has a higher setup cost, while TeamCity offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
TeamCity Logo
Bamboo
3.7 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Bamboo
3.7 out of 5
TeamCity offers extensive plugin support and flexibility, catering to diverse technologies and infrastructures. In comparison, Bamboo integrates seamlessly with the Atlassian suite, benefiting those utilizing Jira and Bitbucket. Tech buyers might prefer TeamCity for customization, while Bamboo suits Atlassian-centric environments.
Download Bamboo vs. TeamCity Report
TeamCity has lower setup costs compared to Bamboo, which involves higher initial investment. Bamboo offers more out-of-the-box integrations, while TeamCity provides greater flexibility in customization and automation.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity has lower setup costs compared to Bamboo, which involves higher initial investment. Bamboo offers more out-of-the-box integrations, while TeamCity provides greater flexibility in customization and automation.
TeamCity Logo
CloudBees
4.2 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
CloudBees
4.2 out of 5
TeamCity excels in Git-based projects through features like build pipelines and plugin support. In comparison, CloudBees emphasizes scalability and security with extensive tool integration, making it ideal for large teams and complex deployments. Both cater to different CI/CD needs with distinct strengths.
Download CloudBees vs. TeamCity Report
TeamCity has a straightforward setup cost approach, while CloudBees involves a more complex pricing structure, differentiating their initial investment requirements. This difference highlights the varying cost approaches and ease of entry into each platform.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity has a straightforward setup cost approach, while CloudBees involves a more complex pricing structure, differentiating their initial investment requirements. This difference highlights the varying cost approaches and ease of entry into each platform.
TeamCity Logo
AWS CodePipeline
4.2 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
AWS CodePipeline
4.2 out of 5
TeamCity offers extensive plugin support and flexibility, making it suitable for complex CI/CD pipelines with multiple integrations. In comparison, AWS CodePipeline integrates seamlessly within AWS services, enhancing deployment with centralized management, appealing to users operating predominantly within the AWS ecosystem.
Download AWS CodePipeline vs. TeamCity Report
TeamCity's setup cost is minimal with straightforward configuration, contrasting AWS CodePipeline, which involves higher initial setup expenses and complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity's setup cost is minimal with straightforward configuration, contrasting AWS CodePipeline, which involves higher initial setup expenses and complexity.
TeamCity Logo
CircleCI
3.3 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
CircleCI
3.3 out of 5
TeamCity offers comprehensive build pipelines and ease of use, excelling in integration and feature flexibility. In comparison, CircleCI stands out for speed, scalability, and seamless GitHub integration. CircleCI users appreciate fast deployment, while TeamCity supports on-premises implementation with strong customization.
Download CircleCI vs. TeamCity Report
TeamCity has a higher setup cost compared to CircleCI, which is more budget-friendly. The significant cost difference may impact the overall initial investment in adopting either solution.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity has a higher setup cost compared to CircleCI, which is more budget-friendly. The significant cost difference may impact the overall initial investment in adopting either solution.
TeamCity Logo
Digital.ai Release
4.2 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Digital.ai Release
4.2 out of 5
TeamCity excels in ease of use, offering seamless CI integration, making it ideal for smaller teams. In comparison, Digital.ai Release provides advanced deployment automation and analytics, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive release management. TeamCity offers cost-effective solutions, while Digital.ai suits large-scale operations.
Download Digital.ai Release vs. TeamCity Report
TeamCity has minimal setup costs, while Digital.ai Release involves a significant initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity has minimal setup costs, while Digital.ai Release involves a significant initial investment.
TeamCity Logo
Buildkite
4.1 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Buildkite
4.1 out of 5
TeamCity provides comprehensive integration capabilities and flexible deployment options. In comparison, Buildkite excels with intuitive configuration and cost-effective scaling, particularly for Docker-heavy environments. TeamCity offers robust plugin systems, while Buildkite provides intelligent cache management and YAML-based workflows.
Download Buildkite vs. TeamCity Report
TeamCity offers a straightforward setup with potential lower initial costs, while Buildkite involves a higher setup expense but provides greater flexibility for complex integrations.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity offers a straightforward setup with potential lower initial costs, while Buildkite involves a higher setup expense but provides greater flexibility for complex integrations.
TeamCity Logo
AWS CodeBuild
4.1 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
AWS CodeBuild
4.1 out of 5
TeamCity offers customizable build templates and cross-platform support, ideal for complex projects. In comparison, AWS CodeBuild provides elasticity and a serverless nature, beneficial for scaling projects within the AWS ecosystem. Both address unique needs in the CI/CD landscape.
Download AWS CodeBuild vs. TeamCity Report
TeamCity has a higher initial setup cost compared to AWS CodeBuild, which offers lower entry expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity has a higher initial setup cost compared to AWS CodeBuild, which offers lower entry expenses.
TeamCity Logo
Nx
3.5 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Nx
3.5 out of 5
Nx is ideal for managing complex projects with microservices architecture due to its robust modular structure and extensible workspace. It offers powerful code generation and intelligent caching features. Some users suggest enhancements in documentation and reducing the initial learning curve for beginners.
View comparison
TeamCity Logo
Travis CI
3.0 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Travis CI
3.0 out of 5
TeamCity excels in customization and deployment flexibility, appealing to enterprises needing control and scalability. In comparison, Travis CI, known for ease of use and efficient setup, attracts startups and smaller teams prioritizing speed and simplicity with strong GitHub integration.
TeamCity requires a significant initial investment for setup, contrasting with Travis CI's minimal setup costs, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity requires a significant initial investment for setup, contrasting with Travis CI's minimal setup costs, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
TeamCity Logo
JFrog Pipeline
4.0 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
JFrog Pipeline
4.0 out of 5
JFrog Pipelines empowers software teams to ship updates faster by automating DevOps processes in a continuously streamlined and secure way across all their teams and tools. Encompassing continuous integration (CI), continuous delivery (CD), infrastructure and more, it automates everything from code to production. Pipelines is natively integrated with the JFrog Platform and is available with both cloud (software-as-a-service) and on-prem subscriptions.
The pricing is the cheapest compared to the other platforms out there.
View comparison
Pricing
The pricing is the cheapest compared to the other platforms out there.
TeamCity Logo
TeamCity Logo
IBM Rational Build Forge
4.5 out of 5
IBM Rational Build Forge automates tasks well and suits legacy systems. In comparison, TeamCity offers integrated functionalities and extensive plugin options. Build Forge suits complex setups, while TeamCity favors quick deployment. Build Forge benefits legacy-reliant firms; TeamCity suits diverse organizations seeking value.
Download IBM Rational Build Forge vs. TeamCity Report
IBM Rational Build Forge involves significant setup costs, emphasizing the complexity of implementation, while TeamCity offers a more cost-effective setup, distinguishing its appeal with a simpler installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Rational Build Forge involves significant setup costs, emphasizing the complexity of implementation, while TeamCity offers a more cost-effective setup, distinguishing its appeal with a simpler installation process.
TeamCity Logo
GNU Make
4.2 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
GNU Make
4.2 out of 5
GNU Make's simplicity and open-source nature are ideal for low-cost project solutions. In comparison, TeamCity offers extensive CI/CD features suitable for complex workflows, making it a choice for organizations willing to invest in advanced build automation and integration capabilities.
Download GNU Make vs. TeamCity Report
GNU Make offers a low setup cost, making it an economical choice, while TeamCity's setup involves a more substantial investment, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two.
View comparison
Pricing
GNU Make offers a low setup cost, making it an economical choice, while TeamCity's setup involves a more substantial investment, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two.
TeamCity Logo
Incredibuild
4.0 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Incredibuild
4.0 out of 5

Incredibuild, the world’s leading platform for development acceleration, lets you deliver faster developer cycles and shorten your time-top market with more compute power and lower costs on prem and the cloud.

View comparison
TeamCity Logo
TeamCity Logo
DBmaestro Database Release and Automation
1 out of 5

Publish releases quickly, prevent accidental overrides, and reduce application downtime caused by database-related errors, all while maintaining stability, scalability, and security.

View comparison
TeamCity Logo
JRebel
4.0 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
JRebel
4.0 out of 5
JRebel is a JVM Java Agent that integrates with application servers, making classes reloadable with existing class loaders. Only changed classes are recompiled and instantly reloaded in the running application. JRebel plugs into IDEs and build systems. Classes and static resources are loaded straight from the workspace.
View comparison
TeamCity Logo
Codefresh
1 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Codefresh
1 out of 5

Codefresh is a next-generation enterprise software delivery platform for cloud-native applications. We help you automate your GitOps workflows and advanced deployments such as Canary and Blue/Green and are the premium Argo enterprise solution. DevOps teams from GoodRx, Monday.com, Deloitte, and more depend on Codefresh to deploy their software in a safe and scalable manner. Codefresh can support any pipeline end-to-end.

View comparison
TeamCity Logo
TeamCity Logo
Oracle Hudson CI
1 out of 5

Hudson monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Among those things, currently Hudson focuses on the following two jobs:

View comparison

Related categories

Build Automation
Application Security Tools
Release Automation