We performed a comparison between Harness and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Earn 20 points
Harness is the first Continuous Delivery-as-a-Service platform that uses Machine Learning to simplify the entire process of delivering code from artifact into production – quickly, safely, securely, and repeatably.
TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.
Harness is ranked 14th in Build Automation while TeamCity is ranked 5th in Build Automation with 4 reviews. Harness is rated 0.0, while TeamCity is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamCity writes "User-friendly and easy to configure, but needs better UI". Harness is most compared with Jenkins, Bamboo, Tekton, GitLab and CircleCI, whereas TeamCity is most compared with GitLab, Jenkins, CircleCI, Bamboo and AWS CodePipeline.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.