Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GitLab vs TeamCity comparison

GitLab and JetBrains are both solutions in the Build Automation category. GitLab is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while JetBrains is ranked #11 with an average rating of 6.8. GitLab holds a 12.6% mindshare in BA, compared to JetBrains’s 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.
GitLab
Read 86 GitLab reviews
  • 19,204 Views
  • 4,417 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
TeamCity
Read 28 TeamCity reviews
  • 1,988 Views
  • 1,988 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

TeamCity and GitLab are prominent solutions in the field of continuous integration and deployment. TeamCity has an edge due to its flexibility in configuring builds, while GitLab's strength lies in providing a comprehensive DevOps platform that includes repository management and seamless code reviews.

Features: TeamCity includes features like extensive continuous integration, customizable build pipelines, and valuable plugins, offering a robust platform for build automation. GitLab is known for its powerful CI/CD integration, containerized approach, and efficient code review processes, making it a holistic solution for version management alongside DevOps activities.

Room for Improvement: TeamCity can enhance the setup and configuration process to be less tedious, and improve deployment support and REST API customization. GitLab needs better integration with project management tools and improvements in metrics and security scanning, as well as more seamless third-party tool integration and AWS support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TeamCity offers multiple deployment options including private, public cloud, and on-premises, with a straightforward setup for private clouds. GitLab supports extensive deployment options, such as hybrid cloud environments. Both platforms have commendable technical support, with GitLab's support infrastructure being more mature and user-focused. TeamCity's Europe-based tech support might face timezone challenges, unlike GitLab.

Pricing and ROI: TeamCity is perceived as costlier but justified by its powerful features, with an entry-level free tier. GitLab, on the other hand, provides a well-regarded free version and premium tiers, though some users find the Ultimate edition expensive. While GitLab's pricing is seen as high for small teams, it remains competitive due to its comprehensive features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. TeamCity Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
GitLab vs. TeamCity
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,445 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.5
GitLab boosts efficiency and ROI by reducing deployment times, enhancing agility, and supporting vulnerability-free software management.
Sentiment score
8.0
TeamCity enhances build efficiency and deployment across time zones, supporting automation for optimized resource allocation and ROI evaluation.
Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.
We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the TeamCity report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.7
GitLab support receives mixed reviews; some praise ticket systems while others report delays, often preferring community or partner assistance.
Sentiment score
7.6
TeamCity's customer service is praised for professionalism, responsive support, comprehensive documentation, and effective community resources despite time zone challenges.
We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.
I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.
I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the TeamCity report
Gaurav Chandel - PeerSpot reviewerMikhael Ibrahim - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2603940 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
GitLab's container architecture supports scalability, enabling easy expansion despite deployment complexities, adapting well to diverse organizational needs.
Sentiment score
7.3
TeamCity enables scalable deployments with multiple agents, requiring regular maintenance, effectively supporting large-scale projects and numerous users.
It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.
We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.
For scaling, other deployment options from GitLab's side need to be adopted.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the TeamCity report
Sarfaraz Khan - PeerSpot reviewerMikhael Ibrahim - PeerSpot reviewerRohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
GitLab is praised for its high stability and reliability, despite occasional upgrade issues, maintaining strong user satisfaction.
Sentiment score
7.7
TeamCity offers high reliability and stability, with minimal disruptions and effective resource management, despite occasional minor lags.
I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.
The updates are frequent and demanding, happening at least once a week due to security reasons.
We raised a request with GitLab support, but they were unable to help because they could not find the root cause of what went wrong.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the TeamCity report
Gaurav Chandel - PeerSpot reviewer
AS
AvdheshSharma - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Room For Improvement

GitLab users want better third-party integration, security, pricing, interface, documentation, automation, stability, and enhanced deployment with improved Agile functionality.
TeamCity's complex setup, poor UI navigation, and integration issues hinder efficiency, with needs for API, reporting, and alert improvements.
It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.
It is essential to conduct proper testing, such as unit tests and code coverage, within the SDLC pipelines.
GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the TeamCity report
reviewer2603940 - PeerSpot reviewerRohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewerSarfaraz Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

GitLab provides flexible pricing from free to premium, catering to various needs, but Ultimate edition may be expensive.
TeamCity offers a developer-focused solution with scalable costs but requires an initial server setup expense despite a free version.
Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.
The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.
The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the TeamCity report
Sarfaraz Khan - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2603940 - PeerSpot reviewerAndrea PICCININI - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Valuable Features

GitLab excels with CI/CD, integration, user interface, security, and platform compatibility, boosting productivity and market speed.
TeamCity excels in build step flexibility, plugin support, cross-platform capabilities, Git integration, and intuitive usability for efficient pipeline management.
As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.
The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.
By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the TeamCity report
Mikhael Ibrahim - PeerSpot reviewerAndrea PICCININI - PeerSpot reviewerRohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

GitLab
Ranking in Build Automation
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
86
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (11th), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)
TeamCity
Ranking in Build Automation
11th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of GitLab is 12.6%, down from 17.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamCity is 6.7%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
GitLab12.6%
TeamCity6.7%
Other80.7%
Build Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewer
Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements
The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.
Read full review
Almoeeni Fazal - PeerSpot reviewer
Impressive pipeline efficiency with helpful support and a fairly straightforward setup
We use TeamCity for the CI/CD pipeline. It is used for deploying code from the desktop to the production environment. We push our code to GitHub, which then creates a pipeline to a server using AWS, deploying automatically without errors or conflicts in GitHub branches.  We also use TeamCity's…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user184734 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 22, 2015
I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.
Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business35
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise42
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise15
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?
I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?
The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.
See all answers
What needs improvement with GitLab?
Regarding improvements, making task management is something that GitLab can potentially make easier, similar to what DevOps or Jira does.
See all answers
What do you like most about TeamCity?
One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamCity?
Compared to new technologies, TeamCity is more expensive and is an older tool compared to tools like GitLab.
See all answers
What needs improvement with TeamCity?
TeamCity's user interface could be improved; specifically, the tree structure on the homepage is not clear, making it difficult to search for projects. Moreover, there are some limitations related ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab
Compared 34% of the time
GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab Logo
GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab
Compared 14% of the time
Tekton vs GitLab Logo
Tekton vs GitLab
Compared 5% of the time
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab
Compared 4% of the time
AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab Logo
AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab
Compared 3% of the time
More GitLab Competitors
GitHub Actions vs TeamCity Logo
GitHub Actions vs TeamCity
Compared 16% of the time
Harness vs TeamCity Logo
Harness vs TeamCity
Compared 13% of the time
Jenkins vs TeamCity Logo
Jenkins vs TeamCity
Compared 11% of the time
CircleCI vs TeamCity Logo
CircleCI vs TeamCity
Compared 7% of the time
Tekton vs TeamCity Logo
Tekton vs TeamCity
Compared 6% of the time
More TeamCity Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
GitLab
September 2025
GitLab reportDownload GitLab product report
Buyer's Guide
TeamCity
August 2025
TeamCity reportDownload TeamCity product report
 

Also Known As

Fuzzit
No data available
 

Overview

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?
  • CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
  • Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
  • Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
  • Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.
What benefits should users evaluate?
  • Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
  • Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
  • Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
  • Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
  • Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

GitLab

TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

JetBrains
 

Sample Customers

1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia
Buyer's Guide
GitLab vs. TeamCity
September 2025
Free Report: GitLab vs. TeamCity
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. TeamCity and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our GitLab vs. TeamCity report.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.