AWS CodeBuild vs GitLab comparison

Read 93 GitLab reviews

27,699 Views
5,263 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

AWS CodeBuild

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

GitLab and AWS CodeBuild are strong competitors in the CI/CD and source code management field. GitLab seems to have the upper hand with a comprehensive feature set that caters to larger enterprises demanding seamless pipeline management and versatile code reviews, while AWS CodeBuild is favored for its simple integration within the AWS ecosystem, offering cost-effective serverless build solutions.

Features: GitLab offers seamless CI/CD pipeline management, robust code review, and extensive repository management capabilities, which are well-suited for teams requiring structured control and peer code scrutiny. AWS CodeBuild, on the other hand, excels in its integration with AWS services, providing a scalable, serverless building environment and effective platform support for varied coding languages and builds.

Room for Improvement: GitLab needs to enhance its AWS integration to compete with other cloud services, improve third-party integration, and expand reporting capabilities to support project management. AWS CodeBuild users highlight the need for improved documentation, easier troubleshooting, and enhanced UI and workflow management to address complexity and environmental setups.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab is flexible, offering both on-premises and cloud deployment, supported by a strong open-source community, though some users feel limited support without a paid plan. AWS CodeBuild provides ease of deployment for companies using AWS, benefiting from AWS's broad support infrastructure but relying on community and internal knowledge for problem-solving.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab has various pricing tiers that cater to different business sizes and needs, but its higher cost tiers can be challenging for smaller teams. In contrast, AWS CodeBuild's pricing based on compute resources is considered cost-effective, particularly for serverless operations. Both platforms deliver a strong ROI by streamlining automation and reducing deployment times, with GitLab's full feature set often justifying its price for enterprises, while AWS CodeBuild provides a more budget-friendly solution for those within the AWS environment.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeBuild vs. GitLab Report (Updated: November 2026).

Download the complete report

AWS CodeBuild vs. GitLab

November 2026

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeBuild

Ranking in Build Automation

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitLab

Ranking in Build Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (9th), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (6th), Rapid Application Development Software (15th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (6th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeBuild is 2.3%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitLab is 6.1%, down from 11.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
GitLab	6.1%
AWS CodeBuild	2.3%
Other	91.6%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

SomdipRoy

Solution Architect at Skillnetinc

Has enabled automated deployments through continuous integration and supports multi-environment delivery

My recommendation for AWS CodeBuild to make it better for the next release would be something within AWS CodeBuild which can support the repository functions as well. It may not be as powerful as GitHub Actions, but it provides a very competitive price compared to GitHub Actions. GitHub Actions, if you want to use the YML CI/CD pipeline, gives a free tier of around three thousand hours per month. AWS CodeBuild is a little more expensive than that. However, if it supports the repository function as well along with it, then it will be a complete package. Everything would be in AWS, including the code versioning, code commit to the code infrastructure, to the code database, to the networking, and how the applications are accessed. Everything would be in one place, which would be very helpful. I believe AWS CodeBuild is a bit expensive because GitHub provides around three thousand minutes free, plus it has the free repository function as well. At the enterprise level, it charges maybe around nineteen dollars per user, though I do not remember exactly. In terms of AWS CodeBuild, I believe it is a bit expensive because it is providing only the deployment features. It is not providing the repository. In that comparison, I would say it is a little bit expensive.

Read full review

BasilJiji

System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Role-based workflows have transformed daily deployments and improve team collaboration

GitLab has role-based access control, so when a team member needs to make a code change, they cannot directly apply it to the environment but must put in a merge request. Once a senior reviews the code and approves it, then it is implemented across the environment, making it safer and allowing everyone to experience the process. The best features GitLab offers are version control and automation, which are the major things that stand out to me. When it comes to access, the login is very smooth, with just one login integrated with our Okta, allowing everyone to log in easily. Deployments become much easier, and that is how GitLab helps. The automation features make my work easier because we use a tool called AWX, which is connected to GitLab. Whenever we run a job on AWX, it directly checks the code and uses it. Since the code is not preserved locally but kept in the cloud, it is safe and nobody can tamper with it. When it comes to safety, that is a major thing. Automation features allow the code to be accessed from any tools we use, so the jobs we run are helping tremendously and doing their work perfectly. For pipeline tasks, we have created a significant amount of pipelines, which are all hosted in GitLab. Running the pipelines has become much easier, and they are doing a perfect job, helping tremendously in our day-to-day activities. GitLab has positively impacted my organization because previously we stored code locally on servers, leading to many risks. Since GitLab came into our environment, our integration and deployments became much easier, helping our work become much smoother. Improvements from GitLab have led to better team collaboration because when several people are working, they can all edit the code and submit it as a merge request, and once approved, it reflects directly to the main branch. Many can work at the same time. When it comes to deployments, deploying has become much faster since we started using GitLab, and even if errors occur, we can spot them easily and troubleshoot, which has helped tremendously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."

"AWS CodeBuild reduces wait time and optimizes workflows."

"It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR)."

"A valuable feature is the support for third-party repositories such as Bitbucket, GitLab, or GitHub."

"The initial setup of CodeBuild is easy."

"The tool is used to build and test code. I find its biggest advantages are elasticity and reliability. We can easily assign as many computing resources as needed to build our code, which is much simpler than traditional methods that require server upgrades. It's a serverless tool, so it's very flexible and elastic."

"AWS CodeBuild's support for popular languages and tools has enhanced my productivity; it supports the three most popular stacks that are in the world: the Python stack, the Node.js stack or framework, and the Java framework, along with other technology stacks such as Ruby on Rails."

"One of the main features I value in CodeBuild compared to previous experiences, like using Jenkins, is its ability to handle tasks automatically with AWS, requiring only proper setup of the check file."

More AWS CodeBuild pros

"<p>In terms of impact from using GitLab as an all-in-one DevOps platform, it helped with my project development life cycle.</p>"

"GitLab has positively impacted my organization because previously we stored code locally on servers, leading to many risks, and since GitLab came into our environment, our integration and deployments became much easier, helping our work become much smoother."

"GitLab is a single solution that helps us do everything we need."

"Overall, this is a good product that has a lot of features."

"We have been using this solution for more than five years, and it is deployed on cloud."

"The solution is valuable for developers because it includes version controlling, pipelines, CI/CD, and integrations."

"Using GitLab is important to help provide a more secure and reliable environment for developers working with information in the cloud."

"The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good."

More GitLab pros

Cons

"Notifications could be added, or SNS integration could be included so that notifications can be received on every build, whether the build fails or succeeds."

"For improvement, I'd suggest more build instance-type options. There's a big jump from 15 gigabytes of RAM to 150, and I'd like something in between as the larger option is too expensive for our needs."

"We had integration issues with a tool called Octopus Deploy while using CodeBuild. AWS support helped us resolve it, however, it could be better."

"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."

"The servers used for macOS and iOS builds are limited in availability, operating only in US East 1 and East 2, and US West 1 and West 2. This geographical limitation causes latency issues and extended build times for regions such as India, impacting production efficiency."

"There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds."

"The deployment fails sometimes."

"Multiple clients have faced issues with pricing. After migrating from Azure to EC2, they were unexpectedly charged 100,000 rupees because the pricing details were not clearly visible."

More AWS CodeBuild cons

"It has fewer options, and its UI is not so user-friendly."

"Authentication can be a problem when you have an application and you want to configure it with them. I used Spring Cloud config and to connect that to GitLab was so hard."

"GitLab doesn't have AWS integration. It would be better to have integration with other container management environments beyond Kubernetes. It has very good integration with Kubernetes, but it doesn't have good integration with, for example, AWS, ETS, etc."

"The documentation is confusing."

"The solution does not have many built-in functions or variables so scripting is required and that is a drawback."

"There are many improvements that GitLab can implement, such as addressing the issue of caching. Currently, when I have multiple tasks to merge or attempt multiple merges, the CI/CD and overall GitLab processes get slower."

"I've noticed an area for improvement in GitLab, particularly needing to go through many steps to push the code to the repository."

"We would like to generate document pages from the sources."

More GitLab cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Despite the cost, it is worth the investment."

"AWS CodeBuild is free. We only pay for our code's compute resources during the build process. For example, if our code takes ten minutes to build, we only pay for those ten minutes of computing time. CodeDeploy and CodePipeline are free because they're serverless and don't require computing resources. CodeCommit has minimal costs for storing code."

"We pay a monthly licensing fee."

"GitLab's pricing is good compared to others on the market."

"In terms of the pricing for GitLab, on a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being cheap, I'm rating pricing for the solution a four. It could still be cheaper because right now, my company has a small team, and sometimes it's difficult to use a paid product for a small team. You'd hope the team will grow and scale, but currently, you're paying a high license fee for a small team. I'm referring to the GitLab license that has premium features and will give you all features. This can be a problem for management to approve the high price of the license for a team this small."

"GitLab is cheap."

"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."

"The price is okay."

"It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."

"We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."

"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	39
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	50

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeBuild?

The cost structure is affordable for most builds except macOS servers. Standard builds can utilize AWS EC2 servers for background operations. However, macOS or iOS builds require physical servers m...

What needs improvement with AWS CodeBuild?

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeBuild?

My use of AWS CodeBuild is focused on the CI/CD part, which stands for continuous integration and continuous deployment. Basically, we write the code and then commit it into a repository, which cou...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

I was using the free version of GitLab , but I think the price is comparative and not a major differentiator.

What needs improvement with GitLab?

Since GitLab [Private Offer Only] the main part is the Git part. With AI being available, I see one thing happening. For example, Claude Code allows people to connect Jira or ClickUp, and then they...

What is your primary use case for GitLab?

My basic use case for Gitlab was the ticket management, the wiki, the CI/CD pipeline, and the code repository. These four use cases form my core usage.

AWS CodePipeline vs AWS CodeBuild

Comparisons

Compared 11% of the time

Jenkins vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 10% of the time

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 8% of the time

Bamboo vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Rational Build Forge vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 5% of the time

More AWS CodeBuild Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 27% of the time

SonarQube vs GitLab

Compared 3% of the time

Jenkins vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

Veracode vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Product Reports

Download AWS CodeBuild product report

AWS CodeBuild

November 2026

Download GitLab product report

October 2026

Also Known As

CodeBuild

Fuzzit

Overview

AWS CodeBuild provides automated build services with seamless AWS service integrations and third-party tools, supporting multiple programming languages. It features serverless architecture, facilitating flexible and efficient workflows.

AWS CodeBuild enables automation of builds through webhooks and integrates smoothly with platforms like GitLab and Jenkins. Its architecture allows multiple concurrent builds, enhancing productivity and speed. With features like CloudWatch logging and IAM permissions, users can easily manage security and debugging processes. Challenges such as limited integrations, geographic efficiencies, and pricing transparency are areas for growth. Notably used for building microservice applications and CI/CD pipelines, it integrates well with GitHub, GitLab, CodeCommit, and CodeDeploy, managing permissions with IAM policies for secure operations.

What are the key features of AWS CodeBuild?

Elastic Serverless Architecture: Increases flexibility and workflow efficiency.
CloudWatch Logging: Simplifies debugging and security management.
CI/CD Integration: Streamlines processes with platforms like GitLab and Jenkins.
Support for Multiple Languages: Offers broad programming language support.

What benefits should users look for in AWS CodeBuild reviews?

Improved Build Speed: Multiple concurrent build requests enhance productivity.
Security Management: Simplified through IAM permissions and integrations.
Flexibility and Efficiency: Serverless architecture supports diverse workflows.
CI/CD Streamlining: Reduces setup efforts with automated workflows.

In various industries, AWS CodeBuild is leveraged for developing microservices, utilizing its capability to manage CI/CD pipelines effectively. Teams often employ it for generating Docker images, automating the deployment process to services such as EKS and ECS, and harnessing platform extensions for comprehensive integrations.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

GitLab offers a streamlined approach to software development with features like CI/CD pipelines, platform integration, and security, making it ideal for enhancing team collaboration and project management across environments.

Targeting development teams, GitLab integrates seamlessly with platforms like AWS and Azure to support robust CI/CD workflows, version control, and automation. Its user-friendly design enhances project management efficiency and scalability, while its security measures ensure comprehensive protection. Used both on-premises and in the cloud, it fosters collaboration through branch management and code merging. However, GitLab could improve integration with Atlassian, offer better iOS build support, and enhance its documentation. Users value its AI-driven features, conflict resolution capabilities, and diverse environment support.

What are GitLab's most important features?

CI/CD Pipelines: Automate processes for seamless deployments
Platform Integration: Works with AWS, Azure for streamlined workflows
Version Control: Manage code changes efficiently
Automation: Reduce manual tasks through automated solutions
Security: Ensure robust data protection

What benefits and ROI can users expect from GitLab?

Enhanced Productivity: Streamlined workflows boost efficiency
Scalability: Easily grows with team needs
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork and communication
Efficient Project Management: Manages tasks and resources effectively
Cost-effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing options

GitLab implementation spans industries like finance, healthcare, and technology where it enhances DevOps practices through improved CI/CD processes, automated testing, and efficient infrastructure management. Teams utilize it to manage code repositories, streamline deployments, and facilitate cross-functional collaboration, thus maintaining high development standards and reducing bottlenecks.

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG