AWS CodeBuild vs CircleCI comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and CircleCI are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1, while CircleCI is ranked #14 with an average rating of 4.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.3% mindshare in BA, compared to CircleCI’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of CircleCI users who would recommend it.

AWS CodeBuild

Read 12 AWS CodeBuild reviews

525 Views
525 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

CircleCI

Read 5 CircleCI reviews

1,036 Views
1,036 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

AWS CodeBuild

CircleCI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

CircleCI and AWS CodeBuild compete in the CI/CD field. CircleCI has an advantage in pricing and support, while AWS CodeBuild is favored for its extensive features and value.

Features: CircleCI offers container-based builds, Bitbucket integration, and artifact storage. It allows encrypting environment variables and setting up SSH into the build environment. AWS CodeBuild provides integration with X-Ray and CloudWatch metrics, allowing seamless visibility into processes. It supports third-party repositories like GitLab and GitHub and offers automatic scaling of resources as needed.

Room for Improvement: CircleCI could enhance its scalability options and introduce more robust logging capabilities. It might also consider deeper integrations with additional cloud providers. AWS CodeBuild could improve its user interface for easier navigation and offer more detailed documentation. Pricing transparency and more flexible pricing tiers could provide better accessibility for smaller teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CircleCI's straightforward setup process and good support appeal to smaller teams and new adopters. AWS CodeBuild, with its complex infrastructure, is ideal for enterprises needing extensive customization and scalability, benefiting from AWS's established ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: CircleCI offers lower setup costs which are suitable for small teams and startups, focusing on fast ROI. AWS CodeBuild might be costlier upfront but offers significant long-term ROI through its extensive AWS ecosystem, providing scalability and integration benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeBuild vs. CircleCI Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild vs. CircleCI

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,390 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeBuild

Ranking in Build Automation

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CircleCI

Ranking in Build Automation

14th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeBuild is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CircleCI is 3.3%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Mahadev Metre

DevOps Engineer at Paydoh

Integration with diverse environments boosts productivity and automation

AWS CodeBuild's support for a wide range of programming languages and build environments benefits development teams significantly in terms of productivity and ease of use. There are extensive libraries of code structures available, making it a universal pipeline. All programming languages I have worked with are supported in AWS CodeBuild, eliminating the need for alternative deployment services. The service supports iOS builds, Kotlin, Java, NodeJS, and ReactJS. AWS has made it accessible to all languages, allowing developers to simply open the console and trigger builds. AWS manages all the background server operations for building or deploying code. For standard builds such as ReactJS or Java, a Linux or Ubuntu server suffices. AWS provides its own operating system for these purposes. For builds requiring physical servers, such as Apple macOS server, AWS rents Mac minis specifically for iOS and SwiftUI builds. While this incurs higher charges, it demonstrates AWS's commitment to providing comprehensive solutions for all use cases.

Read full review

reviewer0972521

Chief Technology Officer at Kyberlife

Unhelpful support, unclear billing, and has offers ability to track usage

We've had occasional connectivity issues with cloud resources and build failure due to its own internal system setup and environment. That costs us credits. Support engineers do not thoroughly read and understand issues when emailing them. They reply to me with a totally different context about the problem. Just yesterday, my web applications failed to 'yarn build' after I downgraded the resource class from extr-large to large. I contacted support and got no reply. Billing is a mess. There is duplicate information in the bill downloaded from their website and when I asked for a consolidated bill, they just answered that they didn't have it. There is no transparency on how many billed minutes and credits I spent each day both on their website and the monthly bill which makes it difficult to understand when the monthly bill contains many refill item charges. It is difficult or impossible to track usage and burndown of my subscription and to gain total outstanding refill amounts on a daily basis. Their website doesn't provide sufficient information on credits allocated/calculated for my extra-large resource class.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."

"The initial setup of CodeBuild is easy."

"The tool is used to build and test code. I find its biggest advantages are elasticity and reliability. We can easily assign as many computing resources as needed to build our code, which is much simpler than traditional methods that require server upgrades. It's a serverless tool, so it's very flexible and elastic."

"A valuable feature is the support for third-party repositories such as Bitbucket, GitLab, or GitHub."

"CodeBuild supports various platforms and coding."

"One of the main features I value in CodeBuild compared to previous experiences, like using Jenkins, is its ability to handle tasks automatically with AWS, requiring only proper setup of the check file."

"AWS CodeBuild reduces wait time and optimizes workflows."

"The most important thing is that it's self-contained in an AWS account, and it's all linked to the customer's AWS account."

More AWS CodeBuild pros

"Enables us to detect exactly which build failed and why, and to push multiple builds to our production environment at a very fast rate."

"The ability to automate the build process in a seamless way and run workflows effortlessly. It supports parallel builds so it can scale well. Also, it covers the basics of any build and integration tool, including email notifications (especially when tests are fixed), project insights, etc."

"The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery."

"It's a stable product."

"Some of the most valuable features include container-based builds, integration with Bit Bucket and being able to store artifacts."

"The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications."

Cons

"Notifications could be added, or SNS integration could be included so that notifications can be received on every build, whether the build fails or succeeds."

"Multiple clients have faced issues with pricing. After migrating from Azure to EC2, they were unexpectedly charged 100,000 rupees because the pricing details were not clearly visible."

"We had integration issues with a tool called Octopus Deploy while using CodeBuild. AWS support helped us resolve it, however, it could be better."

"They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild."

"For improvement, I'd suggest more build instance-type options. There's a big jump from 15 gigabytes of RAM to 150, and I'd like something in between as the larger option is too expensive for our needs."

"The deployment fails sometimes."

"One of the main challenges is that if the environment is not set up properly, it will result in issues such as image errors."

"There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds."

More AWS CodeBuild cons

"There needs to be some improvement in the user interface of CircleCI."

"The solution’s pricing could be better."

"Integration with Microsoft Azure is one area for improvement. Azure is growing in its user base, and supports various cloud infrastructure components such as Service Fabric, App Service, etc. Some of Azure’s deployment models (like Kudu) require a steep learning curve, but if CircleCI would come up with such features (deployment to App Service) out of the box, it would be amazing."

"Billing is a mess."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS CodeBuild is free. We only pay for our code's compute resources during the build process. For example, if our code takes ten minutes to build, we only pay for those ten minutes of computing time. CodeDeploy and CodePipeline are free because they're serverless and don't require computing resources. CodeCommit has minimal costs for storing code."

"We pay a monthly licensing fee."

"Despite the cost, it is worth the investment."

"The price of CircleCI could be less expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Media Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeBuild?

It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR).

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeBuild?

Issues with pricing have been mentioned, especially for new clients who might not realize the cost implications initially, such as leaving servers on for too long and incurring unexpectedly high bi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS CodeBuild?

There is room for improvement in making AWS CodeBuild available on Windows servers in the Mumbai region. Multiple clients have faced issues with pricing. After migrating from Azure ( /products/micr...

See all answers

What do you like most about CircleCI?

The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CircleCI?

Beware of skyrocketing bills as CircleCI does not provide transparency into how they charge refills. Their monthly billing statement is almost unreadable and their online dashboard doesn't provide ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CircleCI?

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 41% of the time

Jenkins vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 23% of the time

GitLab vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 22% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 15% of the time

More AWS CodeBuild Competitors

Tekton vs CircleCI

Compared 27% of the time

TeamCity vs CircleCI

Compared 20% of the time

GitLab vs CircleCI

Compared 17% of the time

GitHub Actions vs CircleCI

Compared 16% of the time

Harness vs CircleCI

Compared 12% of the time

More CircleCI Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild

July 2025

Download AWS CodeBuild product report

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

June 2025

Download CircleCI product report

Also Known As

CodeBuild

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers. CodeBuild scales continuously and processes multiple builds concurrently, so your builds are not left waiting in a queue. You can get started quickly by using prepackaged build environments, or you can create custom build environments that use your own build tools. With CodeBuild, you are charged by the minute for the compute resources you use.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

CircleCI is a leading platform for automating continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD), valued for its capability to manage software updates efficiently. With an easy-to-configure system using YAML files and robust Docker support, CircleCI streamlines backend updates, frontend developments, and mobile app testing across devices. Its parallelism feature and insightful dashboard reduce processing times and improve workflow visibility, respectively, enhancing team collaboration and productivity while maintaining high-quality outputs across development stages.

CircleCI

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Shopify, Zenefits, Concur Technologies, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild vs. CircleCI

July 2025

Free Report: AWS CodeBuild vs. CircleCI

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeBuild vs. CircleCI and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeBuild vs. CircleCI report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.