Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Loom Systems comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Auvik and ServiceNow are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Auvik is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while ServiceNow is ranked #67. Auvik holds a 1.2% mindshare in IM, compared to ServiceNow’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of ServiceNow users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 216 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

18,973 Views
8,728 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Loom Systems

Read 4 Loom Systems reviews

1,959 Views
1,724 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Loom Systems

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Loom Systems and Auvik Network Management are competing products in the IT management sector. ANM has the upper hand with its comprehensive feature set, whereas Loom Systems is favored for cost-effectiveness and support.

Features: Loom Systems is noted for its predictive analytics capabilities, proactive issue resolution features, and seamless integration potential. ANM distinguishes itself with robust network visibility, control features, and extensive monitoring tools, making it ideal for network management.

Room for Improvement: Loom Systems could benefit from expanding its monitoring toolset, enhancing network control features, and improving predictive accuracy in analytics. ANM should focus on reducing setup costs, improving cost efficiency for smaller businesses, and streamlining user interfaces for ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ANM supports a streamlined deployment process and has responsive customer service. Loom Systems integrates effortlessly with existing platforms and is known for its supportive customer service, catering to businesses seeking quick adaptation.

Pricing and ROI: Loom Systems is known for lower setup costs and offers good ROI for smaller businesses. ANM, despite higher initial costs, provides value through its extensive capabilities, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive network solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Loom Systems Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Loom Systems

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

216

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (5th), Network Troubleshooting (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

Loom Systems

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

67th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anomaly Detection Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Loom Systems is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	1.2%
Loom Systems	0.5%
Other	98.3%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

AmanThakkar

Software Engineer at Titanslab Inc.

Network automation has reduced troubleshooting time and supports faster issue resolution

The biggest and best feature I have experienced with Auvik Network Management (ANM) is automatic network discovery, along with features such as topology map, instant alerts, real-time monitoring, easy remote access, and simple dashboards. Among those features, I find automatic network discovery to be the most useful because it gives a clear picture of the entire network without having to create manual diagrams. It is very easy to use Auvik Network Management (ANM), so even a new team member can quickly understand the network because everything is displayed in a very clear way. Auvik Network Management (ANM) has positively impacted our organization by reducing troubleshooting time, improving network visibility, providing a very clear picture, and helping us support multiple client networks and environments very efficiently. We have noticed a 35 to 40% improvement in troubleshooting speed, less manual work in documenting any network system, faster responses to network issues, and better uptime with the client networks.

Read full review

Keerthi Kumar Sangaraju

Technology Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Stable, easy to set up, flexible, and has multiple functionalities, but needs to define priority levels for each incident

What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Auvik is easy to use. It took some time to set it up, and they were pretty good to us. They offered us around six sessions with a technician to help us set up the monitors we wanted. After we were trained properly, I had no issues using it."

"I love the ability to remote into network gear such as switches and firewalls directly from the Auvik dashboard. We do not have to get into a jump box or VPN to a client. We can get a nice, secure terminal session straight to any network that we are monitoring and managing through Auvik. I can access that directly from the Auvik dashboard."

"I would rate Auvik Network Management (ANM) a solid nine out of ten."

"I like the quick mapping. I can put a customer in, and I can put the Auvik monitor in, and then probably within about half an hour to an hour, I can see most of the map."

"Auvik's reporting is pretty useful. It helps us conduct traffic analysis. I like how you can integrate your firewall systems and incorporate devices in different parts of the country."

"Auvik is phenomenal for network monitoring as well as for other functionalities such as remote access or backups."

"Auvik's GUI is user-friendly and well-designed."

"Overall, I really love the tool as it has been super helpful for us in our environment."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"You can develop your own apps within Loom, and they can be configured very simply."

"The RFS portion of the solution is the product's most valuable feature."

"The solution is very scalable; a company wouldn't have any issues expanding it if they needed to, and we have a few thousand users on the solution."

"The solution is absolutely scalable. If an organization needs to expand it out they definitely can."

"What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring. I also like that it's a flexible solution."

"The solution is absolutely scalable."

"Bringing Loom in ensures that the incident process, request process, change, all of these processes are improved."

Cons

"The alerting capabilities can definitely use improvements. We use third-party for that at the moment, and then the way they look for performance on network equipment is really heavy on heavily used devices, such as firewalls."

"The dashboard needs to be more intuitive."

"Multiple maintenances and slow user visibility with very long response times are the downtime issues I do not appreciate."

"More capabilities in terms of default OIDs, so we can leverage more of the information from SNMP would be good to see. It's been a while since I messed with the OIDs, but the last time I was trying to get additional information from printers, such as the model number. I was able to find that information, but it took a good amount of research to figure out how. I want to see more default capability regarding what information gets spit out from SNMP."

"The menu bar and display could be more colorful."

"I require the monitoring of Linux devices and it doesn't support them. Although we've done a trial, we're not going to carry on with it. We've already gone with another product. Also, seeing the topology is quite useful, but it's not really suitable for a large enterprise."

"Another issue is that to use Auvik you have to have a dedicated machine, either a virtual or Windows machine."

"One is the alerting system. While it is very useful, the default alert settings can generate a lot of notifications."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"The reporting is a bit weak."

"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident."

"The discovery and mapping still takes a lot of human intervention, it's quite resource heavy, especially in the initial setup which can take six months of work, especially when you have a large estate that you're dealing with."

"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority."

"The change management within the solution needs to be improved. There needs to be more process automation."

"The reporting is a bit weak. They should work to improve this aspect of the product."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its licensing is very fair. The devices that stand to gain the most benefit from this product are the ones that are billed. In the case of routers, switches, and firewalls, I won't necessarily have the ability to put a management agent on them to gather errors and activity logs. This type of solution is a requirement for me to properly monitor and manage these devices. The devices that aren't being billed are workstation servers, etc. For those devices, I can put agents on them to monitor their health. It has a fair billing structure."

"The pricing is good, but I haven't looked at the pricing in a while. So, I don't know if it has changed or not. As far as I know, the pricing is still where it should be. I have no issues with it."

"For us, it has been good. I do not get too much into the pricing side. We are an MSP, so we have a number of clients, and we are utilizing Auvik as a way for us to be able to better manage and support our clients. The more clients we bring into Auvik, the better the pricing, so we have been happy with how it is."

"Auvik is significantly cheaper than what we were using before."

"I would love to be able to get into the tier with the sys logging and the NetFlow/sFlow. That tier is a little bit expensive for us. If that could come down a little bit in price, we would be using that everywhere."

"I'd say Auvik's price is reasonable. I don't know how much we paid for the old one, so I can't compare the two. But I think it's a good value, considering all the time saved and the information you can get from it."

"Auvik offers two publicly available pricing tiers, but there are also additional options that require contacting a sales representative."

"We have licenses per year. It is on a network device, so we pay for switches and firewalls. Everything else is included, e.g., computers, access points, and printers."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	156
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	25

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is average. The cost is typically higher for these kinds of tools, so it is moderate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

Auvik Network Management (ANM) can be improved with better reporting options. While there are options for reporting, having more clarity would be helpful, along with more advanced analytics and mor...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

Our main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is to monitor and manage the client networks, helping us to track the network devices and identify issues quickly to monitor the performance and...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Loom Systems

Compared 12% of the time

Moogsoft vs Loom Systems

Compared 10% of the time

BigPanda vs Loom Systems

Compared 6% of the time

OpsRamp vs Loom Systems

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Loom Systems

Compared 5% of the time

More Loom Systems Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

October 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

October 2026

Download Loom Systems product report

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

Loom Systems is recognized for its flexibility in RFS and infrastructure monitoring, catering to IT service management. It aids in app creation and configuration, particularly useful for incident management and service desk operations.

Offering user-friendly functionality throughout the software development lifecycle, Loom Systems is valued for its adaptable capabilities in creating tailored implementations. While features like change and configuration management can be challenging, Loom Systems still stands out for its ease of use. Its platform, though resource-intensive initially, integrates with other tools, supporting IT challenges like automation and root cause analysis.

What are the key features of Loom Systems?

RFS Flexibility: Provides adaptable RFS options tailored to varied monitoring needs.
Infrastructure Monitoring: Allows comprehensive monitoring of IT infrastructure.
App Creation Platform: Facilitates easy development of customized applications.
Change Management: Though challenging, its management capabilities are integral.
Integration Capabilities: Supports integration with existing tools for seamless operation.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Enhanced IT Service Management: Facilitates efficient management of incident requests and problem resolution.
Versatile Use Cases: Supports diverse functions from asset management to security and HR modules.
Automation and Ease of Use: Simplifies deployment and migration processes while enabling automation.
Adaptable Implementations: Offers flexibility for custom solutions catering to enterprise needs.
Scalability: Suitable for medium to large enterprises with support for expansion.

In specific industries, Loom Systems is deployed predominantly for IT service management, asset management, and incident management. Medium to large enterprises use it for tasks such as implementation and automation, with additional security and HR capabilities. While smaller enterprises might consider cost, its robust features make it a preferred choice for IT tasks.

ServiceNow

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Citrix, Amdocs, Sysaid, Hexaware, Effibar, Revtrak, Taptica

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Loom Systems

September 2026

Free Report: Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Loom Systems

Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Loom Systems and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Loom Systems report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.