Atera vs Dell CloudIQ comparison

Atera and Dell Technologies are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Atera is ranked #37 with an average rating of 9.8, while Dell Technologies is ranked #36 with an average rating of 8.3. Atera holds a 0.5% mindshare in IM, compared to Dell Technologies’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Atera users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Dell Technologies users who would recommend it.

Atera

Read 16 Atera reviews

6,288 Views
1,069 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Dell CloudIQ

Read 10 Dell CloudIQ reviews

2,579 Views
2,502 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Atera

Dell CloudIQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Atera and Dell CloudIQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Atera vs. Dell CloudIQ Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. Dell CloudIQ

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atera

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

37th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (11th), Network Monitoring Software (39th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (10th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (5th), Patch Management (11th), AIOps (22nd), Agentic Automation (8th)

Dell CloudIQ

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

36th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Atera is 0.5%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dell CloudIQ is 0.9%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Dell CloudIQ	0.9%
Atera	0.5%
Other	98.6%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Ning Chane

IT Manager at Telstra

Remote monitoring has streamlined endpoint management and consistently reduced ticket resolution time

The best features Atera offers include the per-technician pricing, which is honestly one of the biggest things. Unlimited endpoints for a flat monthly fee per tech is a model that makes sense for us, since we are not paying more every time we add a new endpoint. The AI Copilot feature has been a nice addition that helps our techs summarize tickets and suggest fixes faster, which has cut our resolution times noticeably. The AI Copilot feature has specifically helped my team because the automation handles a lot of the routine work, such as patch deployments, maintenance tasks, and monitoring alerts. Atera has positively impacted my organization by transforming how our team operates day-to-day, and the pricing model is hard to beat. The outcomes or metrics showing how Atera has made a positive impact include the 30% reduction in ticket resolution time I mentioned earlier.

Read full review

Haseeb Sheikh

Senior Manager Enterprise Solutions at a media company with 201-500 employees

Proactive monitoring has improved availability and capacity reporting for my infrastructure

The current features including availability, performance, and capacity are good enough, and I think more of better alerting along with improved thresholds of alerts should be implemented. It is helpful, but it should also include the capability to detect zero-day attacks if there are any. I think the remediation could have been better. For example, if I am upgrading my firmware or BIOS or firmware of the infrastructure, it should give me exact CVSS scores and remediation data provided against the CVSS scores. I think the Dell CloudIQ app could be more interactive. If there is a possibility that I can open tickets or SRs via the Dell CloudIQ app, that would be a good feature.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All corporations that have an IT department should look into and utilize this solution."

"Atera has helped me to provide more accurate solutions based on a given problem. For example, we base our solutions on event scenarios, like the alerts. We identify that there's a series of problems occurring in a particular area from the information provided by the alerts."

"It's very easy to use, not just for me, but even for people who have claimed, "I'm not very good at IT." Once you have it installed and you have it set up, it pretty much works by itself. It really helps you do what you need to do. It's easy to use for a beginner, compared to some of the other larger RMMs that are a little bit more complicated."

"Atera has helped me to provide more accurate solutions based on a given problem."

"It is reliable, and when it is working, it works without issues."

"Atera has saved us a lot of time."

"Moreover, I find that if it wasn't for Atera, I wouldn't be gaining the number of clients I have and growing my business as I do."

"Atera saves money. A trip to the customer costs between $20 to $30. Then, you need to charge the customer $20 to $30 for the travel. However, if you are doing this work remotely, then you are not driving. This makes the process easier and saves money for you and the customer. For example, if it is just one machine, then the savings comes out to $50 to $60. If we are talking about a huge client, who has hundreds of machines and is changing their infrastructure, that is a lot of money."

More Atera pros

"The mobile application is the most valuable feature for us; we can monitor all the storages on our phones, and it's really good."

"I rate CloudIQ a ten out of ten."

"Fewer vulnerabilities have been observed in the four years we have used the solution."

"Has really nice roll-up dashboards."

"The dashboard is clear and user-friendly."

"I use Dell CloudIQ for the availability and capacity reporting, which is very helpful in terms of capacity and availability reporting, and if there is any fault or faulty drive or faulty part, I am alerted on time with that, which is the main benefit that avoids any unplanned outage."

"We chose this solution because it is a free product offered from Dell which you can use to monitor, manage and optimize cybersecurity."

"It's convenient because you can access it from a mobile device without needing a laptop."

More Dell CloudIQ pros

Cons

"The mobility of Atera is also a feature which needs to be addressed so that it can be used on iPads, iPhones and things of this nature. I would also like to see an agent included on these devices so that I can monitor, maintain and manage them."

"The one thing that could do with improvement is the reporting. This is from someone who worked in an MSP, where I would want to run a report and be able to just present that to a client."

"It will be interesting if Atera can integrate all kinds of products."

"Having more freedom to perform identity access management would be great — it's one of the things that are necessary for a lot of companies they secured."

"I would like to see more mobile device management. iPad is a big one. I know they've been working on some of that. For me, it would be amazing if I could do tablet devices and even expand it to POS systems or the like. I know that a lot goes into that but I've seen it is an area they're looking at."

"It should improve its processes."

"The one thing that could do with improvement is the reporting."

"Reporting is probably the main frustration."

More Atera cons

"Supporting legacy systems is an area that can be improved."

"The reporting capabilities of this solution could be improved."

"It can improve the reporting facility to create custom reports or dashboards."

"If you have a heterogeneous environment, there might be some limitations in coverage since CloudIQ is primarily designed for Dell-based infrastructures."

"The main limitation of CloudIQ is that it is intended to be used exclusively with Dell hardware."

"I think the remediation could have been better."

"The process of upgrading could be streamlined."

"Getting through support has become a difficult thing. Dell's support has degraded since they took over EMC. It's a bit difficult to use."

More Dell CloudIQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"With Atera, the more you add, the cheaper the cost of the additional endpoints will be."

"We pay per user. I am the only user. It is $150 per user. If I need to add one, it is not as costly as expanding with other providers."

"Atera happened to have the best pricing model."

"The price is reasonable for what we require."

"As an internal IT, it's gold right there. It is money in the bank."

"In terms of cost, it's not very expensive. I’d rate it around three or four out of ten, considering its value for money."

"One of the biggest issues I face is the need to pay per technician. I've dealt with other platforms that you need to have 250-500 devices. Even though the cost declines as the number of devices a person has increases, they still require you to pay for 250 or 500, respectively. With Atera, the number doesn't matter as you always pay the same amount. I approximate that Atera saves me $100 per week."

"Our company is a startup. The initial reason I looked into Atera was the fact that you pay by the technician, not per-device. That means you are able to jump right in with a service without having a large overhead."

More Atera pricing and cost advice

"The solution is more expensive than NetApp which offers file systems in various price ranges."

"I believe it is a free product because we don't pay for it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atera?

The prices have increased over time. After expressing concerns about pricing to account managers, they offered a 30% discount option for annual commitments. The main benefit we see with this produc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atera?

Reporting is probably the main frustration. Some of the more advanced reports are locked behind higher pricing tiers, which feels restrictive. Atera can be improved in that the remote access can al...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Atera?

My main use case for Atera is remote monitoring and management across all our endpoints. We have devices spread across multiple sites, so having one platform where we can see everything, push patch...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Dell CloudIQ?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Dell CloudIQ?

I moved to a new organization where I am also using Dell CloudIQ. I use Dell CloudIQ to monitor PowerStore as well as Dell PowerEdge servers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Dell CloudIQ?

For performance analytics, I have my own NMS in-house that I use. I have deployed a VApp on-premises with all of the servers and storage integrated, and it sends telemetry data directly to Dell. My...

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Atera

Compared 8% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs Atera

Compared 7% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Atera

Compared 7% of the time

Sendbird vs Atera

Compared 6% of the time

KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs Atera

Compared 3% of the time

More Atera Competitors

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 26% of the time

HPE OneView vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 7% of the time

VirtualWisdom vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 7% of the time

eG Enterprise vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 5% of the time

More Dell CloudIQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atera

June 2026

Download Atera product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

June 2026

Download Dell CloudIQ product report

Overview

Atera provides advanced tools for remote monitoring, automation, and ticketing, offering an intuitive design and competitive pricing that supports managed service providers with monitoring, alerts, and system management.

Atera stands out with its automation, remote access, and smooth integration capabilities like PowerShell commands, TeamViewer, and Splashtop. Its monitoring and alert systems allow IT professionals to preemptively address issues, enhancing productivity with features such as a robust ticketing system, patch management, and scripting tools. Cross-platform compatibility and collaboration tools streamline IT operations. Despite its strengths, Atera requires enhancements in identity access management, chat features, mobile device management, third-party integrations, customizable reports, and more detailed role management for technicians. A renewed interface and improved network and cloud service monitoring are desired. Users also look for seamless management across diverse platforms, particularly under connectivity issues.

What are Atera's key features?

Automation: Streamlines processes with powerful automation capabilities.
Remote Access: Facilitates easy access to client machines for issue resolution.
Intuitive Interface: User-friendly design enhances efficiency.
Integration: Seamless TeamViewer and Splashtop integration.
Monitoring: Effective monitoring and alert systems preempt issues.
Ticketing System: Boosts productivity with efficient workflow management.
Patch Management: Ensures systems are always up-to-date.
Scripting: Powerful tools for automation and task execution.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Efficiency: Automation and scripting enhance task management.
Cost-effective: Combines robust features with competitive pricing.
Scalability: Cross-platform compatibility supports business growth.
Productivity: Monitoring and alerts optimize resource allocation.

Atera is widely used by managed service providers and IT support companies to enhance efficiency in industries such as manufacturing and construction. It provides remote monitoring, automation, and comprehensive IT management, ensuring seamless integration with different products and systems for broad site coverage. Businesses leverage Atera's RMM, PSA, ticketing, and IT automation features to improve operational efficiency and responsiveness.

Atera

Dell CloudIQ offers advanced health status alerts, AI-driven predictive capabilities, and centralized monitoring, enhancing storage management through comprehensive visibility and operational efficiency. Its user-friendly dashboards and mobile access create a seamless experience for IT professionals.

Dell CloudIQ empowers organizations with cutting-edge features designed to streamline storage management. Health status alerts utilize a traffic light indicator system, while AI predictive capabilities enhance operational efficiency. The tool provides capacity forecasting and a comprehensive view of storage devices, facilitating updates for compliance and optimization. Centralized monitoring delivers timely issue notifications, and its dashboards, accessible via mobile, provide user-friendly navigation. CloudIQ's availability and capacity reporting features help prevent unplanned outages, offering visibility of storage devices and alerts for faults.

What key features make Dell CloudIQ stand out?

Health Status Alerts: Use traffic light indicators for immediate visibility.
AI Predictive Capabilities: Increase operational efficiency with smart insights.
Capacity Forecasting: Plan effectively with long-term storage capacity insights.
Centralized Monitoring: Consolidates data for informed decision-making.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Simplify navigation with mobile access.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Efficient Monitoring: Real-time alerts and notifications reduce downtime.
Enhanced Performance: Improve storage management with actionable insights.
Predictive Maintenance: Prevent issues before they arise, saving time and resources.
Cost Management: Efficient resource allocation leads to cost reduction.
Comprehensive Integration: Monitor diverse environments with ease.

In industries like healthcare and finance, Dell CloudIQ plays a crucial role in managing complex storage environments. Teams leverage its forecasting capabilities and comprehensive dashboards to maintain high performance and security standards. By supporting virtual infrastructures, Dell CloudIQ assists in delivering optimal storage solutions while addressing critical needs.

Dell Technologies

Sample Customers

MSPs, IT consultants, and IT departments worldwide trust and use Atera.

North Carolina State University

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. Dell CloudIQ

June 2026

Free Report: Atera vs. Dell CloudIQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Atera vs. Dell CloudIQ and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atera vs. Dell CloudIQ report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.